Practical and effective diagnosis of animal anthrax in endemic low-resource settings

• Published in: PLoS neglected tropical diseases Vol. 14; no. 9; p. e0008655
• Main Authors: Aminu, Olubunmi R, Lembo, Tiziana, Zadoks, Ruth N, Biek, Roman, Lewis, Suzanna, Kiwelu, Ireen, Mmbaga, Blandina T, Mshanga, Deogratius, Shirima, Gabriel, Denwood, Matt, Forde, Taya L, Nascimento, Ana LTO, Beechler, Brianna R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: San Francisco Public Library of Science 01-09-2020; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Ambient temperature; Animal health; Anthrax; Bayesian analysis; Biodiversity; Biology and Life Sciences; Blood; Control; Customs; Deoxyribonucleic acid; Detection; Developing countries; Diagnosis; Diagnostic systems; DNA; Endemic species; Health aspects; Infrastructure; Laboratories; LDCs; Livelihoods; Livestock; Mandela, Nelson (1918-2013); Medicine; Medicine and Health Sciences; Methods; Methylene blue; Microscopy; Nucleotide sequence; PCR; Polymerase chain reaction; Probability theory; Research and Analysis Methods; Rural areas; Rural communities; Sensitivity analysis; Skin; Specificity; Stains & staining; Storage; Supervision; Surveillance; Tropical diseases; Zoonoses; Tanzania; United Kingdom > UK
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008655
• EISSN: 1935-2735
• ISSN: 1935-2735; 1935-2727

Anthrax threatens human and animal health, and people's livelihoods in many rural communities in Africa and Asia. In these areas, anthrax surveillance is challenged by a lack of tools for on-site detection. Furthermore, cultural practices and infrastructure may affect sample availability and quality. Practical yet accurate diagnostic solutions are greatly needed to quantify anthrax impacts. We validated microscopic and molecular methods for the detection of Bacillus anthracis in field-collected blood smears and identified alternative samples suitable for anthrax confirmation in the absence of blood smears. We investigated livestock mortalities suspected to be caused by anthrax in northern Tanzania. Field-prepared blood smears (n = 152) were tested by microscopy using four staining techniques as well as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by Bayesian latent class analysis. Median sensitivity (91%, CI .sub.95% [84-96%]) and specificity (99%, CI .sub.95% [96-100%]) of microscopy using azure B were comparable to those of the recommended standard, polychrome methylene blue, PMB (92%, CI .sub.95% [84-97%] and 98%, CI .sub.95% [95-100%], respectively), but azure B is more available and convenient. Other commonly-used stains performed poorly. Blood smears could be obtained for <50% of suspected anthrax cases due to local customs and conditions. However, PCR on DNA extracts from skin, which was almost always available, had high sensitivity and specificity (95%, CI .sub.95% [90-98%] and 95%, CI .sub.95% [87-99%], respectively), even after extended storage at ambient temperature. Azure B microscopy represents an accurate diagnostic test for animal anthrax that can be performed with basic laboratory infrastructure and in the field. When blood smears are unavailable, PCR using skin tissues provides a valuable alternative for confirmation. Our findings lead to a practical diagnostic approach for anthrax in low-resource settings that can support surveillance and control efforts for anthrax-endemic countries globally.