Assessing the readiness of digital data infrastructure for opioid use disorder research

• Published in: Addiction science & clinical practice Vol. 15; no. 1; pp. 24 - 7
• Main Authors: Venkatesh, Arjun, Malicki, Caitlin, Hawk, Kathryn, D'Onofrio, Gail, Kinsman, Jeremiah, Taylor, Andrew
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 10-07-2020; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Clinical standards; Common data elements; Data centers; Data collection; Data Collection - standards; Data dictionaries; Dictionaries; Drug abuse; Drug use; Drugs; Electronic health records; Electronic Health Records - standards; Electronic records; Emergency medicine; Epidemics; Epidemiology; Health information; Health Services Research; Heroin; Humans; Infrastructure; Leverage; Libraries; Literature reviews; Measurement; Medicaid; Medical care quality; Medical records; Medical research; Medicare; Mental health; Narcotics; Ontology; Opioid abuse; Opioid-related disorders; Opioid-Related Disorders - epidemiology; Opioids; Patient care; Quality of care; Quality of Health Care; Quality standards; Segmentation; Substance abuse; Substance use disorder; Surveillance; Systematic review; Electronic health records; Common data elements; Emergency medicine; Opioid-related disorders
• ISSN: 1940-0640; 1940-0632; 1940-0640
• DOI: 10.1186/s13722-020-00198-3

Gaps in electronic health record (EHR) data collection and the paucity of standardized clinical data elements (CDEs) captured from electronic and digital data sources have impeded research efforts aimed at understanding the epidemiology and quality of care for opioid use disorder (OUD). We identified existing CDEs and evaluated their validity and usability, which is required prior to infrastructure implementation within EHRs.
We conducted (a) a systematic literature review of publications in Medline, Embase and the Web of Science using a combination of at least one term related to OUD and EHR and (b) an environmental scan of publicly available data systems and dictionaries used in national informatics and quality measurement of policy initiatives. Opioid-related data elements identified within the environmental scan were compared with related data elements contained within nine common health data code systems and each element was graded for alignment with match results categorized as "exact", "partial", or "none."
The literature review identified 5186 articles for title search, of which 75 abstracts were included for review and 38 articles were selected for full-text review. Full-text articles yielded 237 CDEs, only 12 (5.06%) of which were opioid-specific. The environmental scan identified 379 potential data elements and value sets across 9 data systems and libraries, among which only 84 (22%) were opioid-specific. We found substantial variability in the types of clinical data elements with limited overlap and no single data system included CDEs across all major data element types such as substance use disorder, OUD, medication and mental health. Relative to common health data code systems, few data elements had an exact match (< 1%), while 61% had a partial match and 38% had no matches.
Despite the increasing ubiquity of EHR data standards and national attention placed on the opioid epidemic, we found substantial fragmentation in the design and construction of OUD related CDEs and little OUD specific CDEs in existing data dictionaries, systems and literature. Given the significant gaps in data collection and reporting, future work should leverage existing structured data elements to create standard workflow processes to improve OUD data capture in EHR systems.