Confirmatory factor analysis of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory
Background. The Approaches to Teaching Inventory (ATI) was developed to explore the relationship between students' approaches to learning, and teachers' approaches to teaching in the physical sciences in higher education. It is increasingly being used in other contexts. Aim. To analyse the...
Saved in:
Published in: | British journal of educational psychology Vol. 76; no. 2; pp. 405 - 419 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-06-2006
British Psychological Society |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background. The Approaches to Teaching Inventory (ATI) was developed to explore the relationship between students' approaches to learning, and teachers' approaches to teaching in the physical sciences in higher education. It is increasingly being used in other contexts. Aim. To analyse the factor structure of the ATI. Method. Confirmatory factor analysis. Sample. Inventory responses from over 1,000 university teachers, from four different countries and a wide range of disciplines, experience and teaching level (year of students' study) were used as the sample. Results. Cronbach's alpha values of the 2-scale inventory were acceptable for scale reliability, but not for the 4-scale structure. A good fit to the intended 2-factor structure was obtained by confirmatory factor analysis. Both information transmission/teacher-focused and conceptual change/student-focused scales had well identified intention and strategy subspaces. Conclusion. The ATI has been developed as a relational indicator of two dimensions of approaches to teaching. It is not intended for use in gathering a full, rich self-report of teaching, or in non-relational contexts. However, it has now been used in a number of different contexts, including different subject areas and cultures. There is evidence in this paper that in those contexts its factor structure is, in the main, consistent with the original design. This analysis also suggests ways that the ATI could be improved. [Author abstract, ed] |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:DAFF52DD90B68E2E64E2109523913E1DBF1E9018 ArticleID:BJEP254 ark:/67375/WNG-Z6MR553H-D Refereed article. Includes bibliographical references. British Journal of Educational Psychology; v.76 n.2 p.405-419; June 2006 4 Michael Prosser is now at the Higher Education Academy, UK. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0007-0998 2044-8279 |
DOI: | 10.1348/000709905X43571 |