The implicit power of positive thinking: The effect of positive episodic simulation on implicit future expectancies

Previous research demonstrating that positive episodic simulation enhances future expectancies has relied on explicit expectancy measures. The current study investigated the effects of episodic simulation on implicit expectancies. Using the Future Thinking Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (F...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one Vol. 19; no. 4; p. e0298817
Main Authors: Anderson, Rachel J, Clayton McClure, J Helgi, Bishop, Emma, Howe, David, Riggs, Kevin J, Dewhurst, Stephen A
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Public Library of Science 30-04-2024
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Previous research demonstrating that positive episodic simulation enhances future expectancies has relied on explicit expectancy measures. The current study investigated the effects of episodic simulation on implicit expectancies. Using the Future Thinking Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (FT-IRAP), participants made true/false decisions to indicate whether or not they expected positive/negative outcomes after adopting orientations consistent or inconsistent with an optimistic disposition. The outcome measure, DIRAP, was based on response time differences between consistent and inconsistent blocks. Participants then engaged in either positive simulation training, in which they imagined positive future events, or a neutral visualisation task before repeating the FT-IRAP twice following 10-minute intervals. Positive simulation training increased DIRAP scores for don't-expect-negative trials-boosting participants' readiness to affirm that negative events were unlikely to happen to them. Although findings did not generalise across all trial types, they show potential for positive simulation training to enhance implicit future expectancies.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Current address: School of Education, Language and Psychology, York St John University, York, United Kingdom
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Current address: Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0298817