A comparison of very old patients admitted to intensive care unit after acute versus elective surgery or intervention

We aimed to evaluate differences in outcome between patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) after elective versus acute surgery in a multinational cohort of very old patients (≥80 years; VIP). Predictors of mortality, with special emphasis on frailty, were assessed. In total, 5063 VIPs were i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of critical care Vol. 52; pp. 141 - 148
Main Authors: Jung, Christian, Wernly, Bernhard, Muessig, Johanna M., Kelm, Malte, Boumendil, Ariane, Morandi, Alessandro, Andersen, Finn H., Artigas, Antonio, Bertolini, Guido, Cecconi, Maurizio, Christensen, Steffen, Faraldi, Loredana, Fjølner, Jesper, Lichtenauer, Michael, Bruno, Raphael Romano, Marsh, Brian, Moreno, Rui, Oeyen, Sandra, Öhman, Christina Agvald, Pinto, Bernardo Bollen, Soliman, Ivo W., Szczeklik, Wojciech, Valentin, Andreas, Watson, Ximena, Zafeiridis, Tilemachos, De Lange, Dylan W., Guidet, Bertrand, Flaatten, Hans
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-08-2019
Elsevier Limited
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We aimed to evaluate differences in outcome between patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) after elective versus acute surgery in a multinational cohort of very old patients (≥80 years; VIP). Predictors of mortality, with special emphasis on frailty, were assessed. In total, 5063 VIPs were included in this analysis, 922 were admitted after elective surgery or intervention, 4141 acutely, with 402 after acute surgery. Differences were calculated using Mann-Whitney-U test and Wilcoxon test. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to assess associations with mortality. Compared patients admitted after acute surgery, patients admitted after elective surgery suffered less often from frailty as defined as CFS (28% vs 46%; p < 0.001), evidenced lower SOFA scores (4 ± 5 vs 7 ± 7; p < 0.001). Presence of frailty (CFS >4) was associated with significantly increased mortality both in elective surgery patients (7% vs 12%; p = 0.01), in acute surgery (7% vs 12%; p = 0.02). VIPs admitted to ICU after elective surgery evidenced favorable outcome over patients after acute surgery even after correction for relevant confounders. Frailty might be used to guide clinicians in risk stratification in both patients admitted after elective and acute surgery. Trial registration: NCT03134807. Registered 1st May 2017. •We evaluated differences in outcome between VIPs admitted to ICU after elective versus acute intervention•VIPs after elective intervention evidenced favorable outcome after correction for relevant confounders•Frailty might be used to guide clinicians in risk stratification in both patients admitted after elective and acute surgery.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0883-9441
1557-8615
1557-8615
DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.04.020