The contribution of environmental and dispersal filters on phylogenetic and taxonomic beta diversity patterns in Amazonian tree communities

• Published in: Oecologia Vol. 196; no. 4; pp. 1119 - 1137
• Main Authors: Guevara Andino, Juan Ernesto, Pitman, Nigel C. A., ter Steege, Hans, Peralvo, Manuel, Cerón, Carlos, Fine, Paul V. A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01-08-2021; Springer; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Analysis; Biodiversity; Biological diversity; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Climate; Climate prediction; Community Ecology–Original Research; Dispersal; Dispersion; Ecology; Environmental factors; Filters; Geology; Geomorphology; Hydrology/Water Resources; Life Sciences; Phylogenetics; Phylogeny; Plant Sciences; Soil; Soils; Spatial variations; Taxonomy; Biogeography; Lineages; Beta diversity; Amazon; Environmental filters
• DOI: 10.1007/s00442-021-04981-0
• EISSN: 1432-1939
• ISSN: 0029-8549; 1432-1939

Environmental and dispersal filters are key determinants of species distributions of Amazonian tree communities. However, a comprehensive analysis of the role of environmental and dispersal filters is needed to understand the ecological and evolutionary processes that drive phylogenetic and taxonomic turnover of Amazonian tree communities. We compare measures of taxonomic and phylogenetic beta diversity in 41 one-hectare plots to test the relative importance of climate, soils, geology, geomorphology, pure spatial variables and the spatial variation of environmental drivers of phylogenetic and taxonomic turnover in Ecuadorian Amazon tree communities. We found low phylogenetic and high taxonomic turnover with respect to environmental and dispersal filters. In addition, our results suggest that climate is a significantly better predictor of phylogenetic turnover and taxonomic turnover than geomorphology and soils at all spatial scales. The influence of climate as a predictor of phylogenetic turnover was stronger at broader spatial scales (50 km
2
) whereas geomorphology and soils appear to be better predictors of taxonomic turnover at mid (5 km
2
) and fine spatial scales (0.5 km
2
) but a weak predictor of phylogenetic turnover at broad spatial scales. We also found that the combined effect of geomorphology and soils was significantly higher for taxonomic turnover at all spatial scales but not for phylogenetic turnover at large spatial scales. Geographic distances as proxy of dispersal limitation was a better predictor of phylogenetic turnover at distances of 50 < 500 km. Our findings suggest that climatic variation at regional scales can better predict phylogenetic and taxonomic turnover than geomorphology and soils.