The Early Warning and Response System (EWARS-TDR) for dengue outbreaks: can it also be applied to chikungunya and Zika outbreak warning?

• Published in: BMC infectious diseases Vol. 22; no. 1; p. 235
• Main Authors: Cardenas, Rocio, Hussain-Alkhateeb, Laith, Benitez-Valladares, David, Sánchez-Tejeda, Gustavo, Kroeger, Axel
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 07-03-2022; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Aedes; Animals; Care and treatment; Casualties; Chikungunya; Chikungunya Fever - epidemiology; Colombia; Dengue; Dengue - epidemiology; Dengue outbreak; Diagnosis; Disease Outbreaks; Early warning; Epidemics; Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa, socialmedicin och epidemiologi; Humans; Infectious Diseases; Infectious Medicine; Infektionsmedicin; Mexico; Mosquito Vectors; Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology; Retrospective Studies; Risk factors; Zika; Zika Virus; Zika Virus Infection - epidemiology; Colombia; Chikungunya; Early warning; Colombia; Mexico; Dengue outbreak; Zika
• DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07197-6
• EISSN: 1471-2334

In the Americas, endemic countries for Aedes-borne diseases such as dengue, chikungunya, and Zika face great challenges particularly since the recent outbreaks of CHIKV and ZIKV, all transmitted by the same insect vectors Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus. The Special Program for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR-WHO) has developed together with partners an Early Warning and Response System (EWARS) for dengue outbreaks based on a variety of alarm signals with a high sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV). The question is if this tool can also be used for the prediction of Zika and chikungunya outbreaks.
We conducted in nine districts of Mexico and one large city in Colombia a retrospective analysis of epidemiological data (for the outbreak definition) and of climate and entomological data (as potential alarm indicators) produced by the national surveillance systems for dengue, chikungunya and Zika outbreak prediction covering the following outbreak years: for dengue 2012-2016, for Zika 2015-2017, for chikungunya 2014-2016. This period was divided into a "run in period" (to establish the "historical" pattern of the disease) and an "analysis period" (to identify sensitivity and PPV of outbreak prediction).
In Mexico, the sensitivity of alarm signals for correctly predicting an outbreak was 100% for dengue, and 97% for Zika (chikungunya data could not be obtained in Mexico); the PPV was 83% for dengue and 100% for Zika. The time period between alarm and start of the outbreak (i.e. the time available for early response activities) was for Zika 4-5 weeks. In Colombia the sensitivity of the outbreak prediction was 92% for dengue, 93% for chikungunya and 100% for Zika; the PPV was 68% for dengue, 92% for chikungunya and 54% for Zika; the prediction distance was for dengue 3-5 weeks, for chikungunya 10-13 weeks and for Zika 6-10 weeks.
EWARS demonstrated promising capability of timely disease outbreak prediction with an operational design likely to improve the coordination among stakeholders. However, the prediction validity varied substantially across different types of diseases and appeared less optimal in low endemic settings.