Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes by Attempted Mode of Operative Delivery From a Low Station in the Second Stage of Labor

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes by attempted mode of operative delivery from a low station in the second stage of labor. METHODS:Retrospective study of 2,518 women carrying singleton fetuses at 37 weeks of gestation or greater who underwent attempted forceps-assisted delivery, a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) Vol. 126; no. 6; pp. 1265 - 1272
Main Authors: Halscott, Torre L., Reddy, Uma M., Landy, Helain J., Ramsey, Patrick S., Iqbal, Sara N., Huang, Chun-Chih, Grantz, Katherine L.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved 01-12-2015
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract OBJECTIVE:To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes by attempted mode of operative delivery from a low station in the second stage of labor. METHODS:Retrospective study of 2,518 women carrying singleton fetuses at 37 weeks of gestation or greater who underwent attempted forceps-assisted delivery, attempted vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery, or cesarean delivery from a low station in the second stage of labor. Primary outcomes were stratified by parity and included a maternal adverse outcome composite (postpartum hemorrhage, transfusion, endometritis, peripartum hysterectomy, or intensive care unit admission) and a neonatal adverse outcome composite (5-minute Apgar score less than 4, respiratory morbidity, neonatal intensive care unit admission, shoulder dystocia, birth trauma, or sepsis). RESULTS:In nulliparous patients, the maternal adverse composite was not significantly different between women who underwent attempted forceps (12.1% compared with 10.8%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40–1.34) or vacuum (8.3% compared with 10.8%, adjusted OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.40–1.16) delivery compared with cesarean delivery. Among parous women, the maternal adverse composite was not significantly different with attempted forceps (10.7% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.09–1.71) or vacuum (11.3% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.11–1.72) compared with cesarean delivery. Compared with neonates delivered by cesarean, the neonatal adverse composite was significantly lower among neonates born to nulliparous women who underwent attempted forceps (9.4% compared with 16.7%, adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27–0.72) but not among those who underwent vacuum delivery (11.9% compared with 16.7%, adjusted OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.44–1.04). Among parous women, the neonatal adverse composite was not significantly different after attempted forceps (4.1% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.06–1.35) or vacuum (12.5% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.28–3.87) compared with cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION:A trial of forceps delivery from a low station compared with cesarean delivery was associated with decreased neonatal morbidity among neonates born to nulliparous women. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:II
AbstractList To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes by attempted mode of operative delivery from a low station in the second stage of labor. Retrospective study of 2,518 women carrying singleton fetuses at 37 weeks of gestation or greater who underwent attempted forceps-assisted delivery, attempted vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery, or cesarean delivery from a low station in the second stage of labor. Primary outcomes were stratified by parity and included a maternal adverse outcome composite (postpartum hemorrhage, transfusion, endometritis, peripartum hysterectomy, or intensive care unit admission) and a neonatal adverse outcome composite (5-minute Apgar score less than 4, respiratory morbidity, neonatal intensive care unit admission, shoulder dystocia, birth trauma, or sepsis). In nulliparous patients, the maternal adverse composite was not significantly different between women who underwent attempted forceps (12.1% compared with 10.8%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40-1.34) or vacuum (8.3% compared with 10.8%, adjusted OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.40-1.16) delivery compared with cesarean delivery. Among parous women, the maternal adverse composite was not significantly different with attempted forceps (10.7% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.09-1.71) or vacuum (11.3% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.11-1.72) compared with cesarean delivery. Compared with neonates delivered by cesarean, the neonatal adverse composite was significantly lower among neonates born to nulliparous women who underwent attempted forceps (9.4% compared with 16.7%, adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27-0.72) but not among those who underwent vacuum delivery (11.9% compared with 16.7%, adjusted OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.44-1.04). Among parous women, the neonatal adverse composite was not significantly different after attempted forceps (4.1% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.06-1.35) or vacuum (12.5% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.28-3.87) compared with cesarean delivery. A trial of forceps delivery from a low station compared with cesarean delivery was associated with decreased neonatal morbidity among neonates born to nulliparous women. II.
OBJECTIVETo evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes by attempted mode of operative delivery from a low station in the second stage of labor.METHODSRetrospective study of 2,518 women carrying singleton fetuses at 37 weeks of gestation or greater who underwent attempted forceps-assisted delivery, attempted vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery, or cesarean delivery from a low station in the second stage of labor. Primary outcomes were stratified by parity and included a maternal adverse outcome composite (postpartum hemorrhage, transfusion, endometritis, peripartum hysterectomy, or intensive care unit admission) and a neonatal adverse outcome composite (5-minute Apgar score less than 4, respiratory morbidity, neonatal intensive care unit admission, shoulder dystocia, birth trauma, or sepsis).RESULTSIn nulliparous patients, the maternal adverse composite was not significantly different between women who underwent attempted forceps (12.1% compared with 10.8%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40-1.34) or vacuum (8.3% compared with 10.8%, adjusted OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.40-1.16) delivery compared with cesarean delivery. Among parous women, the maternal adverse composite was not significantly different with attempted forceps (10.7% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.09-1.71) or vacuum (11.3% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.11-1.72) compared with cesarean delivery. Compared with neonates delivered by cesarean, the neonatal adverse composite was significantly lower among neonates born to nulliparous women who underwent attempted forceps (9.4% compared with 16.7%, adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27-0.72) but not among those who underwent vacuum delivery (11.9% compared with 16.7%, adjusted OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.44-1.04). Among parous women, the neonatal adverse composite was not significantly different after attempted forceps (4.1% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.06-1.35) or vacuum (12.5% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.28-3.87) compared with cesarean delivery.CONCLUSIONA trial of forceps delivery from a low station compared with cesarean delivery was associated with decreased neonatal morbidity among neonates born to nulliparous women.LEVEL OF EVIDENCEII.
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes by attempted mode of operative delivery from a low station in the second stage of labor. METHODS:Retrospective study of 2,518 women carrying singleton fetuses at 37 weeks of gestation or greater who underwent attempted forceps-assisted delivery, attempted vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery, or cesarean delivery from a low station in the second stage of labor. Primary outcomes were stratified by parity and included a maternal adverse outcome composite (postpartum hemorrhage, transfusion, endometritis, peripartum hysterectomy, or intensive care unit admission) and a neonatal adverse outcome composite (5-minute Apgar score less than 4, respiratory morbidity, neonatal intensive care unit admission, shoulder dystocia, birth trauma, or sepsis). RESULTS:In nulliparous patients, the maternal adverse composite was not significantly different between women who underwent attempted forceps (12.1% compared with 10.8%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40–1.34) or vacuum (8.3% compared with 10.8%, adjusted OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.40–1.16) delivery compared with cesarean delivery. Among parous women, the maternal adverse composite was not significantly different with attempted forceps (10.7% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.09–1.71) or vacuum (11.3% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.11–1.72) compared with cesarean delivery. Compared with neonates delivered by cesarean, the neonatal adverse composite was significantly lower among neonates born to nulliparous women who underwent attempted forceps (9.4% compared with 16.7%, adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27–0.72) but not among those who underwent vacuum delivery (11.9% compared with 16.7%, adjusted OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.44–1.04). Among parous women, the neonatal adverse composite was not significantly different after attempted forceps (4.1% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.06–1.35) or vacuum (12.5% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.28–3.87) compared with cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION:A trial of forceps delivery from a low station compared with cesarean delivery was associated with decreased neonatal morbidity among neonates born to nulliparous women. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:II
Author Reddy, Uma M.
Ramsey, Patrick S.
Huang, Chun-Chih
Grantz, Katherine L.
Iqbal, Sara N.
Halscott, Torre L.
Landy, Helain J.
AuthorAffiliation Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center and MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, and the University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas; and the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, Maryland
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center and MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, and the University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas; and the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, Maryland
– name: 4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
– name: 3 Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, MD, United States
– name: 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
– name: 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, United States
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Torre
  surname: Halscott
  middlename: L.
  fullname: Halscott, Torre L.
  organization: Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center and MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, and the University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas; and the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, Maryland
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Uma
  surname: Reddy
  middlename: M.
  fullname: Reddy, Uma M.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Helain
  surname: Landy
  middlename: J.
  fullname: Landy, Helain J.
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Patrick
  surname: Ramsey
  middlename: S.
  fullname: Ramsey, Patrick S.
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Sara
  surname: Iqbal
  middlename: N.
  fullname: Iqbal, Sara N.
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Chun-Chih
  surname: Huang
  fullname: Huang, Chun-Chih
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Katherine
  surname: Grantz
  middlename: L.
  fullname: Grantz, Katherine L.
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26551186$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFUk1vEzEUtFBRm378A4R85LJl7fXXXpCiQgtSSg4tEjfLu37bLOzawfYmyr_HIaUqHMCSNXrvzYwtj0_RkfMOEHpFyktS1vLtfHlzWT5bhHDxAs2IklVBq-rrEZqVJa0LqRg7QacxftuTRF0doxMqOCdEiRna3JoEwZkBG2fxZ_DOpFwsp9T6ESJudnieEozrBBbfegvYd3i5hmBSvwH8HoYMYYevgx-xwQu_xXcpz7zDvcNpBfgOWp-tc_fhl3hhGh_O0cvODBEuHvEMfbn-cH_1sVgsbz5dzRdFy4USBWukYNQAqWpOeSk6ABCllIq30gqjOLNUCNOCbayhpLPKMttSI63KCLY6Q-8OvuupGSG3XApm0OvQjybstDe9_nPi-pV-8BvNhKoIV9ngzaNB8D8miEmPfWxhGIwDP0VNZCUY4bUUmcoO1Db4GAN0T8eQUu8j0zky_XdkWfb6-RWfRL8zygR1IGz9kLOK34dpC0GvwAxp9T9v9g_pnibysxa0JJzQXBV557_zE98PtfQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2018_1490720
crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_0528_17394
crossref_primary_10_26416_ObsGin_69_3_2021_5558
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2017_01_013
crossref_primary_10_1097_AOG_0000000000004876
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogc_2018_06_018
crossref_primary_10_1891_J_PE_D_19_00014
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2022_12_305
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajogmf_2020_100221
crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2016_1267846
crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_0528_14820
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_020_03351_7
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00404_020_05519_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anpedi_2018_11_016
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1904_6025
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmj_2022_073991
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjpo_2023_002048
crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2016_1228058
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00404_017_4339_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogoh_2021_102136
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_xagr_2023_100196
crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2021_1940131
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2017_020578
crossref_primary_10_1097_AOG_0000000000004225
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anpede_2019_03_001
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_020_02995_9
crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2017_1315666
crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2019_1631792
crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2020_1852208
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gofs_2017_01_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogc_2024_102425
crossref_primary_10_37737_ace_23015
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogc_2023_102325
crossref_primary_10_1097_ALN_0000000000003589
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_xagr_2024_100312
Cites_doi 10.2105/AJPH.77.8.955
10.1016/S0002-9378(97)80036-1
10.1093/aje/153.2.103
10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06341-3
10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bbf3be
10.1097/01.AOG.0000182616.39503.b2
10.1097/01.AOG.0000114985.22844.6d
10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.01463.x
10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823835d3
10.1136/bmj.329.7456.24
10.1055/s-0030-1247605
10.1097/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d
10.1056/NEJM199912023412301
10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182749ac9
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
2015 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
– notice: 2015 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001156
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: ECM
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1873-233X
EndPage 1272
ExternalDocumentID 10_1097_AOG_0000000000001156
26551186
10.1097/AOG.0000000000001156
00006250-201512000-00023
Genre Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NICHD NIH HHS
  grantid: HHSN267200603425C
– fundername: NCATS NIH HHS
  grantid: UL1TR000101
– fundername: NCATS NIH HHS
  grantid: UL1 TR001409
– fundername: NCRR NIH HHS
  grantid: UL1RR031975
– fundername: Intramural NIH HHS
  grantid: ZIA HD008794-07
– fundername: NCRR NIH HHS
  grantid: UL1 RR031975
– fundername: NCATS NIH HHS
  grantid: UL1 TR000101
– fundername: PHS HHS
  grantid: HHSN267200603425C
GroupedDBID ---
.XZ
.Z2
01R
0R~
123
1J1
2CO
354
40H
4Q1
4Q2
4Q3
53G
5RE
5VS
77Y
7O~
85S
AAAAV
AAAXR
AACTN
AAGIX
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AAJCS
AAMOA
AAMTA
AAQKA
AARTV
AASCR
AASOK
AASXQ
AAUEB
AAWTL
AAXQO
ABASU
ABBUW
ABDIG
ABDPE
ABJNI
ABVCZ
ABXVJ
ABZAD
ACCJW
ACDDN
ACEWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACILI
ACLDA
ACOAL
ACWDW
ACWRI
ACXJB
ACXNZ
ADBBV
ADGGA
ADHPY
AE3
AEBDS
AEETU
AENEX
AFDTB
AFEXH
AFFNX
AFSOK
AFTJW
AFUWQ
AGINI
AHOMT
AHQNM
AHVBC
AIJEX
AINUH
AJIOK
AJNWD
AJZMW
AKRWK
AKULP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALMTX
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AOHHW
AWKKM
BAWUL
BOYCO
BQLVK
BYPQX
C45
CS3
DIWNM
DU5
E.X
EBS
EEVPB
EJD
ERAAH
EX3
F2K
F2L
F2M
F2N
F5P
FCALG
FD6
FDB
FL-
FW0
GNXGY
GQDEL
H0~
HLJTE
HZ~
IKREB
IKYAY
IN~
JF9
JG8
JK3
JK8
K-A
K-F
K8S
KD2
KMI
L-C
L7B
MZP
N9A
NEJ
N~7
N~B
O9-
OAG
OAH
OBH
ODA
ODMTH
OHH
OHYEH
OJAPA
OL1
OLB
OLG
OLH
OLU
OLV
OLW
OLY
OLZ
OPUJH
OVD
OVDNE
OVIDH
OVLEI
OVOZU
OWBYB
OWU
OWV
OWX
OWY
OWZ
OXXIT
P2P
RLZ
S4R
S4S
TEORI
TSPGW
TWZ
UHB
V2I
VVN
W3M
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X3V
X3W
XXN
XYM
ZB8
ZZMQN
~S-
-
08R
0R
1B1
1~5
29N
3O-
4.4
4G.
55
7-5
7O
AAEDT
AAPBV
AAQFI
AAQQT
ABFLS
ABMAC
ABPTK
ACIUM
ADFPA
ADNKB
AFRUD
AGNAY
AHULI
AJNYG
AJYGW
AQIPR
ASCII
DUNZO
FEDTE
FGOYB
G8K
GJ
H0
HVGLF
HZ
IHE
IN
K
M41
NQ-
N~M
OCUKA
OHASI
OHM
OHT
ORVUJ
OUVQU
P-K
R2-
R58
RIG
ROL
RPZ
RSW
S-
SSZ
STF
UNR
X7M
XPP
XZ
YQJ
Z2
ZA5
ZGI
ZXP
--K
.3C
.55
.GJ
1CY
AALRI
AAQXK
AAXUO
ADMUD
AHRYX
BS7
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
IPNFZ
M18
N4W
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c5686-4b7642ae13952506feee607785c7d6a854d266acedbda21fd8d4dc2a7d84dced3
ISSN 0029-7844
IngestDate Tue Sep 17 21:10:17 EDT 2024
Fri Oct 25 09:06:42 EDT 2024
Thu Nov 21 20:57:01 EST 2024
Wed Oct 16 00:45:22 EDT 2024
Thu Aug 13 19:54:53 EDT 2020
Thu Nov 14 18:58:42 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5686-4b7642ae13952506feee607785c7d6a854d266acedbda21fd8d4dc2a7d84dced3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc4683158?pdf=render
PMID 26551186
PQID 1736415976
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4683158
proquest_miscellaneous_1736415976
crossref_primary_10_1097_AOG_0000000000001156
pubmed_primary_26551186
wolterskluwer_health_10_1097_AOG_0000000000001156
wolterskluwer_health_00006250-201512000-00023
ProviderPackageCode OVOZU
L-C
C45
7O~
AARTV
ADFPA
OLH
ASCII
BYPQX
OLG
AAMOA
ODA
OHH
ABZAD
ABBUW
JK3
ADNKB
JK8
H0~
1J1
OLV
OLU
JG8
OLW
OLZ
OLY
F2K
F2M
F2L
F2N
OHASI
AHVBC
AJNYG
FL-
KMI
K8S
OVLEI
AJIOK
OPUJH
V2I
.XZ
S4R
S4S
4Q1
DUNZO
OAG
4Q2
OVDNE
4Q3
AMJPA
OAH
OVD
AHULI
ACEWG
.Z2
N~7
IKYAY
OVIDH
AWKKM
40H
N~B
OBH
OUVQU
ORVUJ
X3V
X3W
ACDDN
ACWRI
BOYCO
AIJEX
AAXQO
AAMTA
AAAXR
OWU
E.X
OCUKA
OWV
OWY
01R
ACXNZ
OWX
OWZ
OL1
ABXVJ
IN~
KD2
OXXIT
77Y
ACWDW
JF9
FW0
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015-December-01
2015-December
2015-Dec
2015-12-00
20151201
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2015
  text: 2015-December-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)
PublicationTitleAlternate Obstet Gynecol
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved
Publisher_xml – name: by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved
References Murphy (R12-23-20211114) 2001; 358
Caughey (R10-23-20211114) 2005; 106
Demissie (R9-23-20211114) 2004; 329
Alexander (R16-23-20211114) 2009; 114
Contag (R15-23-20211114) 2010; 27
Walsh (R13-23-20211114) 2013; 121
Taffel (R1-23-20211114) 1987; 77
Williams (R6-23-20211114) 1991; 78
Wen (R11-23-20211114) 2001; 153
Towner (R8-23-20211114) 1999; 341
Revah (R17-23-20211114) 1997; 176
Martin (R2-23-20211114) 2015; 64
(R3-23-20211114) 2014; 123
Murphy (R18-23-20211114) 2003; 110
Johnson (R7-23-20211114) 2004; 103
Werner (R14-23-20211114) 2011; 118
References_xml – volume: 77
  start-page: 955
  year: 1987
  ident: R1-23-20211114
  article-title: Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980-85 rise.
  publication-title: Am J Public Health
  doi: 10.2105/AJPH.77.8.955
  contributor:
    fullname: Taffel
– volume: 176
  start-page: 200
  year: 1997
  ident: R17-23-20211114
  article-title: Failed trial of vacuum or forcepsmaternal and fetal outcome.
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)80036-1
  contributor:
    fullname: Revah
– volume: 64
  start-page: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: R2-23-20211114
  article-title: Births: final data for 2013.
  publication-title: Natl Vital Stat Rep
  contributor:
    fullname: Martin
– volume: 153
  start-page: 103
  year: 2001
  ident: R11-23-20211114
  article-title: . Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes between vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries.
  publication-title: Am J Epidemiol
  doi: 10.1093/aje/153.2.103
  contributor:
    fullname: Wen
– volume: 358
  start-page: 1203
  year: 2001
  ident: R12-23-20211114
  article-title: Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study.
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06341-3
  contributor:
    fullname: Murphy
– volume: 114
  start-page: 1017
  year: 2009
  ident: R16-23-20211114
  article-title: . Failed operative vaginal delivery.
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bbf3be
  contributor:
    fullname: Alexander
– volume: 106
  start-page: 908
  year: 2005
  ident: R10-23-20211114
  article-title: Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity.
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000182616.39503.b2
  contributor:
    fullname: Caughey
– volume: 103
  start-page: 513
  year: 2004
  ident: R7-23-20211114
  article-title: Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries.
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000114985.22844.6d
  contributor:
    fullname: Johnson
– volume: 110
  start-page: 610
  year: 2003
  ident: R18-23-20211114
  article-title: Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric care.
  publication-title: BJOG
  doi: 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.01463.x
  contributor:
    fullname: Murphy
– volume: 118
  start-page: 1239
  year: 2011
  ident: R14-23-20211114
  article-title: Mode of delivery in nulliparous women and neonatal intracranial injury.
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823835d3
  contributor:
    fullname: Werner
– volume: 329
  start-page: 24
  year: 2004
  ident: R9-23-20211114
  article-title: . Operative vaginal delivery and neonatal and infant adverse outcomes: population based retrospective analysis.
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7456.24
  contributor:
    fullname: Demissie
– volume: 27
  start-page: 493
  year: 2010
  ident: R15-23-20211114
  article-title: . Neonatal outcomes and operative vaginal delivery versus cesarean delivery.
  publication-title: Am J Perinatol
  doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1247605
  contributor:
    fullname: Contag
– volume: 123
  start-page: 693
  year: 2014
  ident: R3-23-20211114
  article-title: Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstetric Care Consensus No. 1.
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d
– volume: 78
  start-page: 789
  year: 1991
  ident: R6-23-20211114
  article-title: A randomized comparison of assisted vaginal delivery by obstetric forceps and polyethylene vacuum cup.
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  contributor:
    fullname: Williams
– volume: 341
  start-page: 1709
  year: 1999
  ident: R8-23-20211114
  article-title: Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury.
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJM199912023412301
  contributor:
    fullname: Towner
– volume: 121
  start-page: 122
  year: 2013
  ident: R13-23-20211114
  article-title: Mode of delivery at term and adverse neonatal outcomes.
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182749ac9
  contributor:
    fullname: Walsh
SSID ssj0001693
Score 2.393562
Snippet OBJECTIVE:To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes by attempted mode of operative delivery from a low station in the second stage of labor....
To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes by attempted mode of operative delivery from a low station in the second stage of labor. Retrospective study of...
OBJECTIVETo evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes by attempted mode of operative delivery from a low station in the second stage of...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
crossref
pubmed
wolterskluwer
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 1265
SubjectTerms Adult
Cesarean Section - adverse effects
Extraction, Obstetrical - adverse effects
Extraction, Obstetrical - methods
Female
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Newborn, Diseases - epidemiology
Infant, Newborn, Diseases - etiology
Labor Stage, Second
Logistic Models
Obstetric Labor Complications - epidemiology
Obstetric Labor Complications - etiology
Odds Ratio
Pregnancy
Retrospective Studies
Title Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes by Attempted Mode of Operative Delivery From a Low Station in the Second Stage of Labor
URI http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=00006250-201512000-00023
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26551186
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1736415976
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4683158
Volume 126
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9owELdoK02TpmnfY1_ypL2hbM2XbR5RS9dKKZFakPoWObHZqo6kGrCK_353sR3CQFP3MB4CJME4uV_Od-fz7wj5pApwO5iIvEL6oRf1tfL6Ycy8giG1iy9giKxDF5d8dCWOh9Gw03Glxdb7_qukYR_IGlfO_oO0m0ZhB3wGmcMWpA7be8n9XBpa53pWYKQxOA5f0uUC_kzP0docLJCPCi1NLISG1mJ6qy0B-LH-gYkaKzBoq1lP9pLqrrZHWxmRl-hC11aqiTckCKO2jZvmgBwk_jf0z99WpS4M01Or8s_nHs6steIQp3BnCps9MsaSIb0mLH2hlRkKJjO5jt4m0PjKjpwS-tYEvC_kzM6GmfoDNza8a2MbftzKE9FGHwseekFYlwxeK2yzxt4is61-4UjcGsr9wJQF2homDP3wIP1q6CvtC8C5g5V7lGYnkyTJxsOr8R45CEChgT49GBydJWfNmI-UNm5hZp9_2dXypuGz5c1sJ-U-uqswYWJ-U6-XaFk94yfksXVX6MDg7Cnp6PIZeXBuEzKek18ObhSkQR3cqIMbzVe0gRtFuNFqShu4UQc3inCjkgLcqIUbvS4pwI0auNEabvjjGm4vyORkOD469WwpD68ATcC8KOfg6EoN_gbOo7Op1podci7igismRRwpsBRloVWuZOBPlVCRKgLJlYB3rcKXZL-sSv2aUBmoQ5mLKO9jtfQgkL7kecgl-OXRFOzlLvHcfc5uDWNL5jItQC7Zn3Lpko9OGBmoVpwvk6WulvPM5yED-xYM9i55ZYTTtAhAQ98cjvANsTUnIG375pHy-ntN3x4xEfqxgH5uCDgzC5_r_jG4Rx4-EL5jfgjCLvF3nv-3a3tzj2t7Sx6uH713ZH_xc6nfk725Wn6wKP8NOuzQDg
link.rule.ids 230,315,782,786,887,27933,27934,64550,64570,65345,65365
linkProvider Ovid
linkToHtml http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwvV1bb9MwFLZYJwHSxB3WcTMSylugSRzbfehD6GUD2hQpRYOnyIkdmGBJtbSb9u85J5eKMkDihbzk4tyscxJ_x-fzZ0Je6hTCDi6ZnSrHs1nfaLvv-dxOOUq7OBKayKrrIhLhJzkao0xOy1XFwWfl8hWuqt80buB0OBgXLgbvIiscH0eD3BpGw8Fn60NwOK66qZEkYY0GxXm2soKwol8Bru-BC2CD1gyedr0dsst9j_sdshtMRos3m182KpK0XBAhGWvH2PXF62B-WGscNgvUgG-3YVeA6VV-5d5Fgbnv8ltFff-pAZvc_k9Vv0NuNQiXBrVL3iXXTH6PXJ81Ofz75HymauFpqnJNQ4Pd97AzX6_gfUxJk0sarFAxC7AwxanaaJHR-dLUEuV0ZL4jleSSTs6KU6rotLigUc0noCc5BTxLIwzyNR79Ul08RUd_QD5Oxovhkd3M_mCn4DzcZomA2EgZgKiYeuWZMYb3hJB-KjRX0mcawIVKjU60cp1MS8106iqhJayN9h6STl7kZp9Q5eqeSiRL-jjBtusqR4nEEwpCOZYBxOoSu7VnvKxFPuI2OQ_2j3-1f5e8aI0ew9eIKRaVm2Jdxo7wOEAiwHhd8qh2gs0dXe5jOAclYss9Nieg0vd2SX7ytVL8Zlx6ji_hPbccKa7HysZ_MnqXOL89_291O_jHZzwnN44Ws2k8fRu-f0xuYmnN9nlCOquztXlKdkq9ftZ8cT8A7q0vjw
linkToPdf http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwvV1Jj9MwFLaYjjRCQuxLWY2Ecgs0iWO7hxyiLkOhk46UQTCnyIkdGAFJNWln1H_Pe1kqygASF3LJ4uz-En_P773PhLzSGZgdXDI7U45ns6HR9tDzuZ1xlHZxJDSRdddFLKJPcjxBmZzOg4_JZ9XyNc7q3zQu4HA4aBeeBO9iaxSPglMrmnyMg8g6Dg8ndTc1BklYx-NpsLHGQXmRr6wwqoOwgN0PAAjYrLUp1K63R_Y55vL2yH44ms1n2x836pJ0ESFCMtZl2g3Fm3Bx2CgdthM8B99tya7Q06tRljcuS_SAV1_rAPifmrHprf_6Am6Tmy3bpWEDzzvkminukoOj1p9_j1wcqUaEmqpC08hgVz6sLNYruCtT0XRDwxWqZwEvpjhsGy1zuliaRq6cjs03DCvZ0Ol5-Z0qOi8vadzEFtCzggK3pTEa_Bq3fq4PniPo75MP08nJ6K3djgRhZwAkbrNUgJ2kDNBVdMPy3BjDB0JIPxOaK-kzDURDZUanWrlOrqVmOnOV0BLmRnsPSK8oC_OIUOXqgUolS4c42LbrKkeJ1BMKzDqWA93qE7ur1WTZCH4knaMeUJD8ioI-edlVfQJfJrpbVGHKdZU4wuNAj4Dv9cnDBgrbM7rcR9MOSsQOSLY7oOr3bklx9qVW_2Zceo4v4T534JQ0ebPJnyq9T5zf7v-3Z3v8j9d4QQ4Ag8l8Fr1_Qq5jYRP485T0Vudr84zsVXr9vP3sfgAJ3jJo
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maternal+and+Neonatal+Outcomes+by+Attempted+Mode+of+Operative+Delivery+From+a+Low+Station+in+the+Second+Stage+of+Labor&rft.jtitle=Obstetrics+and+gynecology+%28New+York.+1953%29&rft.au=Halscott%2C+Torre+L&rft.au=Reddy%2C+Uma+M&rft.au=Landy%2C+Helain+J&rft.au=Ramsey%2C+Patrick+S&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.eissn=1873-233X&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1265&rft.epage=1272&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FAOG.0000000000001156&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0029-7844&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0029-7844&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0029-7844&client=summon