Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes by Attempted Mode of Operative Delivery From a Low Station in the Second Stage of Labor
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes by attempted mode of operative delivery from a low station in the second stage of labor. METHODS:Retrospective study of 2,518 women carrying singleton fetuses at 37 weeks of gestation or greater who underwent attempted forceps-assisted delivery, a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) Vol. 126; no. 6; pp. 1265 - 1272 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved
01-12-2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | OBJECTIVE:To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes by attempted mode of operative delivery from a low station in the second stage of labor.
METHODS:Retrospective study of 2,518 women carrying singleton fetuses at 37 weeks of gestation or greater who underwent attempted forceps-assisted delivery, attempted vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery, or cesarean delivery from a low station in the second stage of labor. Primary outcomes were stratified by parity and included a maternal adverse outcome composite (postpartum hemorrhage, transfusion, endometritis, peripartum hysterectomy, or intensive care unit admission) and a neonatal adverse outcome composite (5-minute Apgar score less than 4, respiratory morbidity, neonatal intensive care unit admission, shoulder dystocia, birth trauma, or sepsis).
RESULTS:In nulliparous patients, the maternal adverse composite was not significantly different between women who underwent attempted forceps (12.1% compared with 10.8%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40–1.34) or vacuum (8.3% compared with 10.8%, adjusted OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.40–1.16) delivery compared with cesarean delivery. Among parous women, the maternal adverse composite was not significantly different with attempted forceps (10.7% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.09–1.71) or vacuum (11.3% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.11–1.72) compared with cesarean delivery. Compared with neonates delivered by cesarean, the neonatal adverse composite was significantly lower among neonates born to nulliparous women who underwent attempted forceps (9.4% compared with 16.7%, adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27–0.72) but not among those who underwent vacuum delivery (11.9% compared with 16.7%, adjusted OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.44–1.04). Among parous women, the neonatal adverse composite was not significantly different after attempted forceps (4.1% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.06–1.35) or vacuum (12.5% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.28–3.87) compared with cesarean delivery.
CONCLUSION:A trial of forceps delivery from a low station compared with cesarean delivery was associated with decreased neonatal morbidity among neonates born to nulliparous women.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:II |
---|---|
AbstractList | To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes by attempted mode of operative delivery from a low station in the second stage of labor.
Retrospective study of 2,518 women carrying singleton fetuses at 37 weeks of gestation or greater who underwent attempted forceps-assisted delivery, attempted vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery, or cesarean delivery from a low station in the second stage of labor. Primary outcomes were stratified by parity and included a maternal adverse outcome composite (postpartum hemorrhage, transfusion, endometritis, peripartum hysterectomy, or intensive care unit admission) and a neonatal adverse outcome composite (5-minute Apgar score less than 4, respiratory morbidity, neonatal intensive care unit admission, shoulder dystocia, birth trauma, or sepsis).
In nulliparous patients, the maternal adverse composite was not significantly different between women who underwent attempted forceps (12.1% compared with 10.8%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40-1.34) or vacuum (8.3% compared with 10.8%, adjusted OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.40-1.16) delivery compared with cesarean delivery. Among parous women, the maternal adverse composite was not significantly different with attempted forceps (10.7% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.09-1.71) or vacuum (11.3% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.11-1.72) compared with cesarean delivery. Compared with neonates delivered by cesarean, the neonatal adverse composite was significantly lower among neonates born to nulliparous women who underwent attempted forceps (9.4% compared with 16.7%, adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27-0.72) but not among those who underwent vacuum delivery (11.9% compared with 16.7%, adjusted OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.44-1.04). Among parous women, the neonatal adverse composite was not significantly different after attempted forceps (4.1% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.06-1.35) or vacuum (12.5% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.28-3.87) compared with cesarean delivery.
A trial of forceps delivery from a low station compared with cesarean delivery was associated with decreased neonatal morbidity among neonates born to nulliparous women.
II. OBJECTIVETo evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes by attempted mode of operative delivery from a low station in the second stage of labor.METHODSRetrospective study of 2,518 women carrying singleton fetuses at 37 weeks of gestation or greater who underwent attempted forceps-assisted delivery, attempted vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery, or cesarean delivery from a low station in the second stage of labor. Primary outcomes were stratified by parity and included a maternal adverse outcome composite (postpartum hemorrhage, transfusion, endometritis, peripartum hysterectomy, or intensive care unit admission) and a neonatal adverse outcome composite (5-minute Apgar score less than 4, respiratory morbidity, neonatal intensive care unit admission, shoulder dystocia, birth trauma, or sepsis).RESULTSIn nulliparous patients, the maternal adverse composite was not significantly different between women who underwent attempted forceps (12.1% compared with 10.8%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40-1.34) or vacuum (8.3% compared with 10.8%, adjusted OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.40-1.16) delivery compared with cesarean delivery. Among parous women, the maternal adverse composite was not significantly different with attempted forceps (10.7% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.09-1.71) or vacuum (11.3% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.11-1.72) compared with cesarean delivery. Compared with neonates delivered by cesarean, the neonatal adverse composite was significantly lower among neonates born to nulliparous women who underwent attempted forceps (9.4% compared with 16.7%, adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27-0.72) but not among those who underwent vacuum delivery (11.9% compared with 16.7%, adjusted OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.44-1.04). Among parous women, the neonatal adverse composite was not significantly different after attempted forceps (4.1% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.06-1.35) or vacuum (12.5% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.28-3.87) compared with cesarean delivery.CONCLUSIONA trial of forceps delivery from a low station compared with cesarean delivery was associated with decreased neonatal morbidity among neonates born to nulliparous women.LEVEL OF EVIDENCEII. OBJECTIVE:To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes by attempted mode of operative delivery from a low station in the second stage of labor. METHODS:Retrospective study of 2,518 women carrying singleton fetuses at 37 weeks of gestation or greater who underwent attempted forceps-assisted delivery, attempted vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery, or cesarean delivery from a low station in the second stage of labor. Primary outcomes were stratified by parity and included a maternal adverse outcome composite (postpartum hemorrhage, transfusion, endometritis, peripartum hysterectomy, or intensive care unit admission) and a neonatal adverse outcome composite (5-minute Apgar score less than 4, respiratory morbidity, neonatal intensive care unit admission, shoulder dystocia, birth trauma, or sepsis). RESULTS:In nulliparous patients, the maternal adverse composite was not significantly different between women who underwent attempted forceps (12.1% compared with 10.8%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40–1.34) or vacuum (8.3% compared with 10.8%, adjusted OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.40–1.16) delivery compared with cesarean delivery. Among parous women, the maternal adverse composite was not significantly different with attempted forceps (10.7% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.09–1.71) or vacuum (11.3% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.11–1.72) compared with cesarean delivery. Compared with neonates delivered by cesarean, the neonatal adverse composite was significantly lower among neonates born to nulliparous women who underwent attempted forceps (9.4% compared with 16.7%, adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27–0.72) but not among those who underwent vacuum delivery (11.9% compared with 16.7%, adjusted OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.44–1.04). Among parous women, the neonatal adverse composite was not significantly different after attempted forceps (4.1% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.06–1.35) or vacuum (12.5% compared with 12.5%, adjusted OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.28–3.87) compared with cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION:A trial of forceps delivery from a low station compared with cesarean delivery was associated with decreased neonatal morbidity among neonates born to nulliparous women. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:II |
Author | Reddy, Uma M. Ramsey, Patrick S. Huang, Chun-Chih Grantz, Katherine L. Iqbal, Sara N. Halscott, Torre L. Landy, Helain J. |
AuthorAffiliation | Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center and MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, and the University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas; and the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, Maryland |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center and MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, and the University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas; and the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, Maryland – name: 4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States – name: 3 Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, MD, United States – name: 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States – name: 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, United States |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Torre surname: Halscott middlename: L. fullname: Halscott, Torre L. organization: Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center and MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, and the University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas; and the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, Maryland – sequence: 2 givenname: Uma surname: Reddy middlename: M. fullname: Reddy, Uma M. – sequence: 3 givenname: Helain surname: Landy middlename: J. fullname: Landy, Helain J. – sequence: 4 givenname: Patrick surname: Ramsey middlename: S. fullname: Ramsey, Patrick S. – sequence: 5 givenname: Sara surname: Iqbal middlename: N. fullname: Iqbal, Sara N. – sequence: 6 givenname: Chun-Chih surname: Huang fullname: Huang, Chun-Chih – sequence: 7 givenname: Katherine surname: Grantz middlename: L. fullname: Grantz, Katherine L. |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26551186$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFUk1vEzEUtFBRm378A4R85LJl7fXXXpCiQgtSSg4tEjfLu37bLOzawfYmyr_HIaUqHMCSNXrvzYwtj0_RkfMOEHpFyktS1vLtfHlzWT5bhHDxAs2IklVBq-rrEZqVJa0LqRg7QacxftuTRF0doxMqOCdEiRna3JoEwZkBG2fxZ_DOpFwsp9T6ESJudnieEozrBBbfegvYd3i5hmBSvwH8HoYMYYevgx-xwQu_xXcpz7zDvcNpBfgOWp-tc_fhl3hhGh_O0cvODBEuHvEMfbn-cH_1sVgsbz5dzRdFy4USBWukYNQAqWpOeSk6ABCllIq30gqjOLNUCNOCbayhpLPKMttSI63KCLY6Q-8OvuupGSG3XApm0OvQjybstDe9_nPi-pV-8BvNhKoIV9ngzaNB8D8miEmPfWxhGIwDP0VNZCUY4bUUmcoO1Db4GAN0T8eQUu8j0zky_XdkWfb6-RWfRL8zygR1IGz9kLOK34dpC0GvwAxp9T9v9g_pnibysxa0JJzQXBV557_zE98PtfQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2018_1490720 crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_0528_17394 crossref_primary_10_26416_ObsGin_69_3_2021_5558 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2017_01_013 crossref_primary_10_1097_AOG_0000000000004876 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogc_2018_06_018 crossref_primary_10_1891_J_PE_D_19_00014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2022_12_305 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajogmf_2020_100221 crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2016_1267846 crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_0528_14820 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_020_03351_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00404_020_05519_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anpedi_2018_11_016 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1904_6025 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmj_2022_073991 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjpo_2023_002048 crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2016_1228058 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00404_017_4339_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogoh_2021_102136 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_xagr_2023_100196 crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2021_1940131 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2017_020578 crossref_primary_10_1097_AOG_0000000000004225 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anpede_2019_03_001 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_020_02995_9 crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2017_1315666 crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2019_1631792 crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2020_1852208 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gofs_2017_01_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogc_2024_102425 crossref_primary_10_37737_ace_23015 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogc_2023_102325 crossref_primary_10_1097_ALN_0000000000003589 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_xagr_2024_100312 |
Cites_doi | 10.2105/AJPH.77.8.955 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)80036-1 10.1093/aje/153.2.103 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06341-3 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bbf3be 10.1097/01.AOG.0000182616.39503.b2 10.1097/01.AOG.0000114985.22844.6d 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.01463.x 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823835d3 10.1136/bmj.329.7456.24 10.1055/s-0030-1247605 10.1097/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d 10.1056/NEJM199912023412301 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182749ac9 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. 2015 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. – notice: 2015 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001156 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: ECM name: MEDLINE url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1873-233X |
EndPage | 1272 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1097_AOG_0000000000001156 26551186 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001156 00006250-201512000-00023 |
Genre | Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural Evaluation Study Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NICHD NIH HHS grantid: HHSN267200603425C – fundername: NCATS NIH HHS grantid: UL1TR000101 – fundername: NCATS NIH HHS grantid: UL1 TR001409 – fundername: NCRR NIH HHS grantid: UL1RR031975 – fundername: Intramural NIH HHS grantid: ZIA HD008794-07 – fundername: NCRR NIH HHS grantid: UL1 RR031975 – fundername: NCATS NIH HHS grantid: UL1 TR000101 – fundername: PHS HHS grantid: HHSN267200603425C |
GroupedDBID | --- .XZ .Z2 01R 0R~ 123 1J1 2CO 354 40H 4Q1 4Q2 4Q3 53G 5RE 5VS 77Y 7O~ 85S AAAAV AAAXR AACTN AAGIX AAHPQ AAIQE AAJCS AAMOA AAMTA AAQKA AARTV AASCR AASOK AASXQ AAUEB AAWTL AAXQO ABASU ABBUW ABDIG ABDPE ABJNI ABVCZ ABXVJ ABZAD ACCJW ACDDN ACEWG ACGFO ACGFS ACILI ACLDA ACOAL ACWDW ACWRI ACXJB ACXNZ ADBBV ADGGA ADHPY AE3 AEBDS AEETU AENEX AFDTB AFEXH AFFNX AFSOK AFTJW AFUWQ AGINI AHOMT AHQNM AHVBC AIJEX AINUH AJIOK AJNWD AJZMW AKRWK AKULP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALMTX AMJPA AMKUR AMNEI AOHHW AWKKM BAWUL BOYCO BQLVK BYPQX C45 CS3 DIWNM DU5 E.X EBS EEVPB EJD ERAAH EX3 F2K F2L F2M F2N F5P FCALG FD6 FDB FL- FW0 GNXGY GQDEL H0~ HLJTE HZ~ IKREB IKYAY IN~ JF9 JG8 JK3 JK8 K-A K-F K8S KD2 KMI L-C L7B MZP N9A NEJ N~7 N~B O9- OAG OAH OBH ODA ODMTH OHH OHYEH OJAPA OL1 OLB OLG OLH OLU OLV OLW OLY OLZ OPUJH OVD OVDNE OVIDH OVLEI OVOZU OWBYB OWU OWV OWX OWY OWZ OXXIT P2P RLZ S4R S4S TEORI TSPGW TWZ UHB V2I VVN W3M WH7 WOQ WOW X3V X3W XXN XYM ZB8 ZZMQN ~S- - 08R 0R 1B1 1~5 29N 3O- 4.4 4G. 55 7-5 7O AAEDT AAPBV AAQFI AAQQT ABFLS ABMAC ABPTK ACIUM ADFPA ADNKB AFRUD AGNAY AHULI AJNYG AJYGW AQIPR ASCII DUNZO FEDTE FGOYB G8K GJ H0 HVGLF HZ IHE IN K M41 NQ- N~M OCUKA OHASI OHM OHT ORVUJ OUVQU P-K R2- R58 RIG ROL RPZ RSW S- SSZ STF UNR X7M XPP XZ YQJ Z2 ZA5 ZGI ZXP --K .3C .55 .GJ 1CY AALRI AAQXK AAXUO ADMUD AHRYX BS7 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF IPNFZ M18 N4W NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5686-4b7642ae13952506feee607785c7d6a854d266acedbda21fd8d4dc2a7d84dced3 |
ISSN | 0029-7844 |
IngestDate | Tue Sep 17 21:10:17 EDT 2024 Fri Oct 25 09:06:42 EDT 2024 Thu Nov 21 20:57:01 EST 2024 Wed Oct 16 00:45:22 EDT 2024 Thu Aug 13 19:54:53 EDT 2020 Thu Nov 14 18:58:42 EST 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 6 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5686-4b7642ae13952506feee607785c7d6a854d266acedbda21fd8d4dc2a7d84dced3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc4683158?pdf=render |
PMID | 26551186 |
PQID | 1736415976 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4683158 proquest_miscellaneous_1736415976 crossref_primary_10_1097_AOG_0000000000001156 pubmed_primary_26551186 wolterskluwer_health_10_1097_AOG_0000000000001156 wolterskluwer_health_00006250-201512000-00023 |
ProviderPackageCode | OVOZU L-C C45 7O~ AARTV ADFPA OLH ASCII BYPQX OLG AAMOA ODA OHH ABZAD ABBUW JK3 ADNKB JK8 H0~ 1J1 OLV OLU JG8 OLW OLZ OLY F2K F2M F2L F2N OHASI AHVBC AJNYG FL- KMI K8S OVLEI AJIOK OPUJH V2I .XZ S4R S4S 4Q1 DUNZO OAG 4Q2 OVDNE 4Q3 AMJPA OAH OVD AHULI ACEWG .Z2 N~7 IKYAY OVIDH AWKKM 40H N~B OBH OUVQU ORVUJ X3V X3W ACDDN ACWRI BOYCO AIJEX AAXQO AAMTA AAAXR OWU E.X OCUKA OWV OWY 01R ACXNZ OWX OWZ OL1 ABXVJ IN~ KD2 OXXIT 77Y ACWDW JF9 FW0 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2015-December-01 2015-December 2015-Dec 2015-12-00 20151201 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-12-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2015 text: 2015-December-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Obstet Gynecol |
PublicationYear | 2015 |
Publisher | by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved |
Publisher_xml | – name: by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved |
References | Murphy (R12-23-20211114) 2001; 358 Caughey (R10-23-20211114) 2005; 106 Demissie (R9-23-20211114) 2004; 329 Alexander (R16-23-20211114) 2009; 114 Contag (R15-23-20211114) 2010; 27 Walsh (R13-23-20211114) 2013; 121 Taffel (R1-23-20211114) 1987; 77 Williams (R6-23-20211114) 1991; 78 Wen (R11-23-20211114) 2001; 153 Towner (R8-23-20211114) 1999; 341 Revah (R17-23-20211114) 1997; 176 Martin (R2-23-20211114) 2015; 64 (R3-23-20211114) 2014; 123 Murphy (R18-23-20211114) 2003; 110 Johnson (R7-23-20211114) 2004; 103 Werner (R14-23-20211114) 2011; 118 |
References_xml | – volume: 77 start-page: 955 year: 1987 ident: R1-23-20211114 article-title: Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980-85 rise. publication-title: Am J Public Health doi: 10.2105/AJPH.77.8.955 contributor: fullname: Taffel – volume: 176 start-page: 200 year: 1997 ident: R17-23-20211114 article-title: Failed trial of vacuum or forcepsmaternal and fetal outcome. publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)80036-1 contributor: fullname: Revah – volume: 64 start-page: 1 year: 2015 ident: R2-23-20211114 article-title: Births: final data for 2013. publication-title: Natl Vital Stat Rep contributor: fullname: Martin – volume: 153 start-page: 103 year: 2001 ident: R11-23-20211114 article-title: . Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes between vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries. publication-title: Am J Epidemiol doi: 10.1093/aje/153.2.103 contributor: fullname: Wen – volume: 358 start-page: 1203 year: 2001 ident: R12-23-20211114 article-title: Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study. publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06341-3 contributor: fullname: Murphy – volume: 114 start-page: 1017 year: 2009 ident: R16-23-20211114 article-title: . Failed operative vaginal delivery. publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181bbf3be contributor: fullname: Alexander – volume: 106 start-page: 908 year: 2005 ident: R10-23-20211114 article-title: Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity. publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000182616.39503.b2 contributor: fullname: Caughey – volume: 103 start-page: 513 year: 2004 ident: R7-23-20211114 article-title: Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries. publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000114985.22844.6d contributor: fullname: Johnson – volume: 110 start-page: 610 year: 2003 ident: R18-23-20211114 article-title: Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric care. publication-title: BJOG doi: 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.01463.x contributor: fullname: Murphy – volume: 118 start-page: 1239 year: 2011 ident: R14-23-20211114 article-title: Mode of delivery in nulliparous women and neonatal intracranial injury. publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823835d3 contributor: fullname: Werner – volume: 329 start-page: 24 year: 2004 ident: R9-23-20211114 article-title: . Operative vaginal delivery and neonatal and infant adverse outcomes: population based retrospective analysis. publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7456.24 contributor: fullname: Demissie – volume: 27 start-page: 493 year: 2010 ident: R15-23-20211114 article-title: . Neonatal outcomes and operative vaginal delivery versus cesarean delivery. publication-title: Am J Perinatol doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1247605 contributor: fullname: Contag – volume: 123 start-page: 693 year: 2014 ident: R3-23-20211114 article-title: Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstetric Care Consensus No. 1. publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d – volume: 78 start-page: 789 year: 1991 ident: R6-23-20211114 article-title: A randomized comparison of assisted vaginal delivery by obstetric forceps and polyethylene vacuum cup. publication-title: Obstet Gynecol contributor: fullname: Williams – volume: 341 start-page: 1709 year: 1999 ident: R8-23-20211114 article-title: Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury. publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJM199912023412301 contributor: fullname: Towner – volume: 121 start-page: 122 year: 2013 ident: R13-23-20211114 article-title: Mode of delivery at term and adverse neonatal outcomes. publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182749ac9 contributor: fullname: Walsh |
SSID | ssj0001693 |
Score | 2.393562 |
Snippet | OBJECTIVE:To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes by attempted mode of operative delivery from a low station in the second stage of labor.... To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes by attempted mode of operative delivery from a low station in the second stage of labor. Retrospective study of... OBJECTIVETo evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes by attempted mode of operative delivery from a low station in the second stage of... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest crossref pubmed wolterskluwer |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 1265 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Cesarean Section - adverse effects Extraction, Obstetrical - adverse effects Extraction, Obstetrical - methods Female Humans Infant, Newborn Infant, Newborn, Diseases - epidemiology Infant, Newborn, Diseases - etiology Labor Stage, Second Logistic Models Obstetric Labor Complications - epidemiology Obstetric Labor Complications - etiology Odds Ratio Pregnancy Retrospective Studies |
Title | Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes by Attempted Mode of Operative Delivery From a Low Station in the Second Stage of Labor |
URI | http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=00006250-201512000-00023 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26551186 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1736415976 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4683158 |
Volume | 126 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9owELdoK02TpmnfY1_ypL2hbM2XbR5RS9dKKZFakPoWObHZqo6kGrCK_353sR3CQFP3MB4CJME4uV_Od-fz7wj5pApwO5iIvEL6oRf1tfL6Ycy8giG1iy9giKxDF5d8dCWOh9Gw03Glxdb7_qukYR_IGlfO_oO0m0ZhB3wGmcMWpA7be8n9XBpa53pWYKQxOA5f0uUC_kzP0docLJCPCi1NLISG1mJ6qy0B-LH-gYkaKzBoq1lP9pLqrrZHWxmRl-hC11aqiTckCKO2jZvmgBwk_jf0z99WpS4M01Or8s_nHs6steIQp3BnCps9MsaSIb0mLH2hlRkKJjO5jt4m0PjKjpwS-tYEvC_kzM6GmfoDNza8a2MbftzKE9FGHwseekFYlwxeK2yzxt4is61-4UjcGsr9wJQF2homDP3wIP1q6CvtC8C5g5V7lGYnkyTJxsOr8R45CEChgT49GBydJWfNmI-UNm5hZp9_2dXypuGz5c1sJ-U-uqswYWJ-U6-XaFk94yfksXVX6MDg7Cnp6PIZeXBuEzKek18ObhSkQR3cqIMbzVe0gRtFuNFqShu4UQc3inCjkgLcqIUbvS4pwI0auNEabvjjGm4vyORkOD469WwpD68ATcC8KOfg6EoN_gbOo7Op1podci7igismRRwpsBRloVWuZOBPlVCRKgLJlYB3rcKXZL-sSv2aUBmoQ5mLKO9jtfQgkL7kecgl-OXRFOzlLvHcfc5uDWNL5jItQC7Zn3Lpko9OGBmoVpwvk6WulvPM5yED-xYM9i55ZYTTtAhAQ98cjvANsTUnIG375pHy-ntN3x4xEfqxgH5uCDgzC5_r_jG4Rx4-EL5jfgjCLvF3nv-3a3tzj2t7Sx6uH713ZH_xc6nfk725Wn6wKP8NOuzQDg |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,782,786,887,27933,27934,64550,64570,65345,65365 |
linkProvider | Ovid |
linkToHtml | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwvV1bb9MwFLZYJwHSxB3WcTMSylugSRzbfehD6GUD2hQpRYOnyIkdmGBJtbSb9u85J5eKMkDihbzk4tyscxJ_x-fzZ0Je6hTCDi6ZnSrHs1nfaLvv-dxOOUq7OBKayKrrIhLhJzkao0xOy1XFwWfl8hWuqt80buB0OBgXLgbvIiscH0eD3BpGw8Fn60NwOK66qZEkYY0GxXm2soKwol8Bru-BC2CD1gyedr0dsst9j_sdshtMRos3m182KpK0XBAhGWvH2PXF62B-WGscNgvUgG-3YVeA6VV-5d5Fgbnv8ltFff-pAZvc_k9Vv0NuNQiXBrVL3iXXTH6PXJ81Ofz75HymauFpqnJNQ4Pd97AzX6_gfUxJk0sarFAxC7AwxanaaJHR-dLUEuV0ZL4jleSSTs6KU6rotLigUc0noCc5BTxLIwzyNR79Ul08RUd_QD5Oxovhkd3M_mCn4DzcZomA2EgZgKiYeuWZMYb3hJB-KjRX0mcawIVKjU60cp1MS8106iqhJayN9h6STl7kZp9Q5eqeSiRL-jjBtusqR4nEEwpCOZYBxOoSu7VnvKxFPuI2OQ_2j3-1f5e8aI0ew9eIKRaVm2Jdxo7wOEAiwHhd8qh2gs0dXe5jOAclYss9Nieg0vd2SX7ytVL8Zlx6ji_hPbccKa7HysZ_MnqXOL89_291O_jHZzwnN44Ws2k8fRu-f0xuYmnN9nlCOquztXlKdkq9ftZ8cT8A7q0vjw |
linkToPdf | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwvV1Jj9MwFLaYjjRCQuxLWY2Ecgs0iWO7hxyiLkOhk46UQTCnyIkdGAFJNWln1H_Pe1kqygASF3LJ4uz-En_P773PhLzSGZgdXDI7U45ns6HR9tDzuZ1xlHZxJDSRdddFLKJPcjxBmZzOg4_JZ9XyNc7q3zQu4HA4aBeeBO9iaxSPglMrmnyMg8g6Dg8ndTc1BklYx-NpsLHGQXmRr6wwqoOwgN0PAAjYrLUp1K63R_Y55vL2yH44ms1n2x836pJ0ESFCMtZl2g3Fm3Bx2CgdthM8B99tya7Q06tRljcuS_SAV1_rAPifmrHprf_6Am6Tmy3bpWEDzzvkminukoOj1p9_j1wcqUaEmqpC08hgVz6sLNYruCtT0XRDwxWqZwEvpjhsGy1zuliaRq6cjs03DCvZ0Ol5-Z0qOi8vadzEFtCzggK3pTEa_Bq3fq4PniPo75MP08nJ6K3djgRhZwAkbrNUgJ2kDNBVdMPy3BjDB0JIPxOaK-kzDURDZUanWrlOrqVmOnOV0BLmRnsPSK8oC_OIUOXqgUolS4c42LbrKkeJ1BMKzDqWA93qE7ur1WTZCH4knaMeUJD8ioI-edlVfQJfJrpbVGHKdZU4wuNAj4Dv9cnDBgrbM7rcR9MOSsQOSLY7oOr3bklx9qVW_2Zceo4v4T534JQ0ebPJnyq9T5zf7v-3Z3v8j9d4QQ4Ag8l8Fr1_Qq5jYRP485T0Vudr84zsVXr9vP3sfgAJ3jJo |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maternal+and+Neonatal+Outcomes+by+Attempted+Mode+of+Operative+Delivery+From+a+Low+Station+in+the+Second+Stage+of+Labor&rft.jtitle=Obstetrics+and+gynecology+%28New+York.+1953%29&rft.au=Halscott%2C+Torre+L&rft.au=Reddy%2C+Uma+M&rft.au=Landy%2C+Helain+J&rft.au=Ramsey%2C+Patrick+S&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.eissn=1873-233X&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1265&rft.epage=1272&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FAOG.0000000000001156&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0029-7844&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0029-7844&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0029-7844&client=summon |