CONSTRAINED EFFICIENCY IN THE NEOCLASSICAL GROWTH MODEL WITH UNINSURABLE IDIOSYNCRATIC SHOCKS

We investigate the welfare properties of the one-sector neoclassical growth model with uninsurable idiosyncratic shocks. We focus on the notion of constrained efficiency used in the general equilibrium literature. Our characterization of constrained efficiency uses the first-order condition of a con...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Econometrica Vol. 80; no. 6; pp. 2431 - 2467
Main Authors: Dávila, Julio, Hong, Jay H., Krusell, Per, Ríos-Rull, José-Víctor
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Econometric Society 01-11-2012
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We investigate the welfare properties of the one-sector neoclassical growth model with uninsurable idiosyncratic shocks. We focus on the notion of constrained efficiency used in the general equilibrium literature. Our characterization of constrained efficiency uses the first-order condition of a constrained planner's problem. This condition highlights the margins of relevance for whether capital is too high or too low: the factor composition of income of the (consumption-)poor. Using three calibrations commonly considered in the literature, we illustrate that there can be either over- or underaccumulation of capital in steady state and that the constrained optimum may or may not be consistent with a nondegenerate long-run distribution of wealth. For the calibration that roughly matches the income and wealth distribution, the constrained inefficiency of the market outcome is rather striking: it has much too low a steady-state capital stock.
Bibliography:We thank Tim Kehoe, Michael Magill, Iván Werning, and Martine Quinzii, as well as the editor and three anonymous referees, for very helpful comments. Krusell thanks the National Science Foundation. Ríos‐Rull thanks the National Science Foundation and the University of Pennsylvania Research Foundation for support. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis or the Federal Reserve System.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0012-9682
1468-0262
1468-0262
DOI:10.3982/ECTA5989