How do genetic correlations affect species range shifts in a changing environment?

• Published in: Ecology letters Vol. 15; no. 3; pp. 251 - 259
• Main Authors: Duputié, Anne, Massol, François, Chuine, Isabelle, Kirkpatrick, Mark, Ronce, Ophélie
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-03-2012; Blackwell
• Subjects: Adaptation; Adaptation, Physiological - genetics; Animal and plant ecology; Animal migration; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Biological and medical sciences; climate change; Climatology. Bioclimatology. Climate change; Earth, ocean, space; Exact sciences and technology; External geophysics; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Gene Flow; General aspects; genetic constraints; Genetic Variation; Genetics, Population; Genotype & phenotype; Meteorology; Models, Biological; multivariate evolution; Phenotype; Population Density; Population genetics; range shift; Selection, Genetic; spatial heterogeneity; genetic constraints; Dynamical climatology; Climate change; Heterogeneity; Gene flow; Geographic distribution; multivariate evolution; Environment; Genetics; spatial heterogeneity; range shift; Distribution range; Adaptation
• ISSN: 1461-023X; 1461-0248
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01734.x

Ecology Letters (2012)
Species may be able to respond to changing environments by a combination of adaptation and migration. We study how adaptation affects range shifts when it involves multiple quantitative traits evolving in response to local selection pressures and gene flow. All traits develop clines shifting in space, some of which may be in a direction opposite to univariate predictions, and the species tracks its environmental optimum with a constant lag. We provide analytical expressions for the local density and average trait values. A species can sustain faster environmental shifts, develop a wider range and greater local adaptation when spatial environmental variation is low (generating low migration load) and multitrait adaptive potential is high. These conditions are favoured when nonlinear (stabilising) selection is weak in the phenotypic direction of the change in optimum, and genetic variation is high in the phenotypic direction of the selection gradient.