Examining respect, autonomy, and mistreatment in childbirth in the US: do provider type and place of birth matter?

• Published in: Reproductive health Vol. 20; no. 1; p. 67
• Main Authors: Niles, P Mimi, Baumont, Monique, Malhotra, Nisha, Stoll, Kathrin, Strauss, Nan, Lyndon, Audrey, Vedam, Saraswathi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 01-05-2023; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Analysis; Attended births; Autonomy; Autonomy (Philosophy); Birth center; Birthing centers; Childbirth; Childbirth & labor; Cross-Sectional Studies; Decision making; Delivery, Obstetric; Female; Gender identity; Home births; Homebirth; Humans; Maternal child nursing; Maternal Health Services; Medical care; Midwifery; Midwives; Minority & ethnic groups; Negligence; Parturition; Patient outcomes; Patient safety; Patients rights; Physicians; Practice; Pregnancy; Prenatal care; Quality management; Quality of care; Reproductive health; Respectful maternity care; United States; Womens health; United States; United States > US; Mistreatment; Respectful maternity care; Birth center; Homebirth; Midwifery; Autonomy; Childbirth
• ISSN: 1742-4755; 1742-4755
• DOI: 10.1186/s12978-023-01584-1

Analyses of factors that determine quality of perinatal care consistently rely on clinical markers, while failing to assess experiential outcomes. Understanding how model of care and birth setting influence experiences of respect, autonomy, and decision making, is essential for comprehensive assessment of quality.
We examined responses (n = 1771) to an online cross-sectional national survey capturing experiences of perinatal care in the United States. We used validated patient-oriented measures and scales to assess four domains of experience: (1) decision-making, (2) respect, (3) mistreatment, and (4) time spent during visits. We categorized the provider type and birth setting into three groups: midwife at community birth, midwife at hospital-birth, and physician at hospital-birth. For each group, we used multivariate logistic regression, adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics, to estimate the odds of experiential outcomes in all the four domains.
Compared to those cared for by physicians in hospitals, individuals cared for by midwives in community settings had more than five times the odds of experiencing higher autonomy (aOR: 5.22, 95% CI: 3.65-7.45), higher respect (aOR: 5.39, 95% CI: 3.72-7.82) and lower odds of mistreatment (aOR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.10-0.26). We found significant differences across birth settings: participants cared for by midwives in the community settings had significantly better experiential outcomes than those in the hospital settings: high- autonomy (aOR: 2.97, 95% CI: 2.66-4.27), respect (aOR: 4.15, 95% CI: 2.81-6.14), mistreatment (aOR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.11-0.34), time spent (aOR: 8.06, 95% CI: 4.26-15.28).
Participants reported better experiential outcomes when cared for by midwives than by physicians. And for those receiving midwifery care, the quality of experiential outcomes was significantly higher in community settings than in hospital settings. Care settings matter and structures of hospital-based care may impair implementation of the person-centered midwifery care model.