A prospective cohort study of the accuracy and safety of robot-assisted minimally invasive spinal surgery

• Published in: BMC surgery Vol. 22; no. 1; p. 47
• Main Authors: Fan, Mingxing, Fang, Yanming, Zhang, Qi, Zhao, Jingwei, Liu, Bo, Tian, Wei
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 11-02-2022; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Accuracy; Analysis; Back surgery; Blood; Body mass index; Bone surgery; Cohort analysis; Comorbidity; Disease; Female; Fractures; Gender; Hospitals; Humans; Insertion; Internal fixation in fractures; Intervertebral discs; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery; Male; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods; Normal distribution; Operating systems; Orthopedics; Patients; Pedicle Screws; Prospective Studies; Quality of life; Rank tests; Rankings; Robotic surgery; Robotics; Robots; Safety; Safety and security measures; Screws; Software; Spinal cord; Spinal Fusion - adverse effects; Spinal Fusion - methods; Spine (lumbar); Spondylolisthesis; Statistical analysis; Statistical tests; Subgroups; Thoracic Vertebrae - surgery; Transplants & implants; Treatment Outcome; Variance analysis
• ISSN: 1471-2482; 1471-2482
• DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01503-4

Robot-assisted open surgery (RA-OS) is now commonly used in traditional open-exposure spinal screw placement surgery. With the help of robots, robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (RA-MIS) can achieve less bleeding and less tissue damage in percutaneous screw insertion. While the research comparing the safety and accuracy of screw placement between RA-MIS and RA-OS is insufficient. This study aims to compare the effects of RA-MIS and RA-OS in thoracic and lumbar spine.
This was a prospective cohort study evaluating 208 patients undergoing robot-assisted screw insertions from July 2020 to September 2021. Age, BMI, gender, screws accuracy, screws Gertzbein-Robbins grade, small joint invasion and perioperative outcomes (operation time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, comorbidity) were collected. A subgroup analysis was also performed according to disease, namely fracture, spondylolisthesis, and disc herniation. Data were analyzed using Stata/MP 14.0. Wilcoxon's signed rank test, Kruskal-Wallis test and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical tests and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
A total of 1030 screws were inserted; 368 minimally invasive screws and 662 open screws. The acceptability of screw insertion in the RA-MIS and RA-OS was 97.3% and 95.6% respectively. There was no statistical difference between the RA-MIS group and RA-OS group in age (p = 0.106), gender (p = 0.074), BMI (p = 0.181) and comorbidity (p = 0.203). Compared with RA-OS, RA-MIS had less blood loss (p < 0.001) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (p = 0.008). In the minimally invasive surgery group, the fracture subgroup had smaller screw deviation, less blood loss, and shorter operation time compared with the other subgroups (p < 0.01). Specifically, RA-MIS significantly reduced the postoperative hospital stay of patients with spondylolisthesis compared with RA-OS (p < 0.01).
RA-OS and RA-MIS had equal accuracy and safety. Compared with open surgery, minimally invasive surgery reduced blood loss in each subgroup and shortened the postoperative hospital stay in the spondylolisthesis subgroup. Compared with the other subgroups under minimally invasive surgery, the fracture subgroup had less blood loss and shorter operation time.
NCT04040868. Registered 1 March 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04040868?cond=Accuracy+Study+of+Robot-assisted+Screw+Insertion+in+Spinal+Surgery&draw=2&rank=1 .