Ex vivo preliminary investigation of radiographic quantitative assessment of cranial tibial displacement at varying degrees of canine stifle flexion with or without an intact cranial cruciate ligament

• Published in: BMC veterinary research Vol. 14; no. 1; p. 270
• Main Authors: Castaneda, Katrina A, Hudson, Caleb C, Beale, Brian S
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 03-09-2018; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Analysis; Animals; Anterior Cruciate Ligament - diagnostic imaging; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; Arthritis; Arthrography - veterinary; Canine stifle; Change detection; Compression; Correlation coefficients; Cranial cruciate ligament injury; Cranial Tibial subluxation; Cruciate ligaments; Diagnosis; Dogs; Femur; Health aspects; Investigations; Joint diseases; Joint Instability - veterinary; Knee; Ligaments; Measurement techniques; Methodology; Radiography; Range of Motion, Articular; Skull; Stifle - diagnostic imaging; Tibia; Radiography; Canine stifle; Cranial cruciate ligament injury; Cranial Tibial subluxation
• ISSN: 1746-6148; 1746-6148
• DOI: 10.1186/s12917-018-1599-5

The presence of cranial tibial subluxation can aid in the detection of joint instability as a result of CrCL injury. Detection of cranial tibial subluxation has been described using the tibial compression test (TCT) and cranial drawer test (CDT); however, diagnosis of CrCL insufficiency by assessing cranial subluxation motion of the tibia is subjective and difficult to quantify accurately. The aim of this study was to investigate a measurement technique to assess the degree of cranial tibial displacement relative to the femoral condyles on mediolateral projection stifle radiographs at varying degrees of stifle flexion (90°, 110°, and 135°) in CrCL intact, partially, and completely transected conditions. Radiographic measurements included: CrCL length and intercondylar distance (ICD), defined as the distance between the tibial mechanical axis (TMA) and the femoral condylar axis (FCA). The influence of CrCL status, stifle flexion angle, and measurement type on measured distance was evaluated. The relationship between CrCL length and ICD measurement was also assessed.
Complete transection of the CrCL resulted in significant cranial tibial displacement. Stifle flexion angle affected ICD, but not CrCL length. Normalized measured CrCL length and ICD were significantly different; however, no differences existed between the change in distance detected by CrCL length and ICD measurements as CrCL transection status changed. Correlation coefficients detected a significant positive correlation between measured CrCL and ICD.
The ICD measurement technique was able to quantify tibial displacement at various stifle flexion angles in the intact and completely transected CrCL conditions. The ICD measurement was more affected by stifle flexion angle than was the CrCL length.