Inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation for evaluating selection bias in the estimation of childhood obesity prevalence using data from electronic health records

• Published in: BMC medical informatics and decision making Vol. 20; no. 1; p. 9
• Main Authors: Sayon-Orea, Carmen, Moreno-Iribas, Conchi, Delfrade, Josu, Sanchez-Echenique, Manuela, Amiano, Pilar, Ardanaz, Eva, Gorricho, Javier, Basterra, Garbiñe, Nuin, Marian, Guevara, Marcela
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 20-01-2020; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Age; Age groups; Bias; Body height; Body mass index; Child health; Childhood; Childhood obesity; Children; Children & youth; Childrens health; Demographic aspects; E-health; Electronic health records; Electronic medical records; Electronic records; Families & family life; Family; Family income; Forecasts and trends; Health services; Health surveillance; Inverse-probability weighting; Mathematical analysis; Medical records; Missing data; Multiple imputation; Nutrition; Obesity; Pediatrics; Population; Prejudice; Prevalence; Primary care; Public health; Variables; Weight status; Weighting; Spain; Childhood obesity; Inverse-probability weighting; Prevalence; Weight status; Multiple imputation; Electronic health records
• ISSN: 1472-6947; 1472-6947
• DOI: 10.1186/s12911-020-1020-8

Height and weight data from electronic health records are increasingly being used to estimate the prevalence of childhood obesity. Here, we aim to assess the selection bias due to missing weight and height data from electronic health records in children older than five.
Cohort study of 10,811 children born in Navarra (Spain) between 2002 and 2003, who were still living in this region by December 2016. We examined the differences between measured and non-measured children older than 5 years considering weight-associated variables (sex, rural or urban residence, family income and weight status at 2-5 yrs). These variables were used to calculate stabilized weights for inverse-probability weighting and to conduct multiple imputation for the missing data. We calculated complete data prevalence and adjusted prevalence considering the missing data using inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation for ages 6 to 14 and group ages 6 to 9 and 10 to 14.
For 6-9 years, complete data, inverse-probability weighting and multiple imputation obesity age-adjusted prevalence were 13.18% (95% CI: 12.54-13.85), 13.22% (95% CI: 12.57-13.89) and 13.02% (95% CI: 12.38-13.66) and for 10-14 years 8.61% (95% CI: 8.06-9.18), 8.62% (95% CI: 8.06-9.20) and 8.24% (95% CI: 7.70-8.78), respectively.
Ages at which well-child visits are scheduled and for the 6 to 9 and 10 to 14 age groups, weight status estimations are similar using complete data, multiple imputation and inverse-probability weighting. Readily available electronic health record data may be a tool to monitor the weight status in children.