Liver morphometrics and metabolic blood profile across divergent phenotypes for feed efficiency in the bovine

• Published in: Acta veterinaria scandinavica Vol. 59; no. 1; p. 24
• Main Authors: Montanholi, Yuri Regis, Haas, Livia Sadocco, Swanson, Kendall Carl, Coomber, Brenda Lynn, Yamashiro, Shigeto, Miller, Stephen Paul
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 26-04-2017; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Albumin; Alkaline phosphatase; Analysis; Animal Feed; Animals; Beef; Beef cattle; Blood plasma; Body Composition; Carbon dioxide; Carbon Dioxide - blood; Cattle; Cattle - blood; Cattle - physiology; Cholesterol; Cholesterol - blood; Cholesterol - metabolism; Circadian Rhythm; Creatine; Creatinine; Creatinine - blood; Eating - physiology; Efficiency; Energy metabolism; Feeds; Food and nutrition; Gene expression; Genetic aspects; Growth; Hepatocyte dimensions; Indicator organisms; Lipase; Liver; Liver - anatomy & histology; Liver - physiology; Male; Metabolism; Muscles; Organ Size; Performance evaluation; Physiological aspects; Physiology; Population; Serum Albumin - metabolism; Serum Albumin, Human; Ultrasonic imaging; Veins; Weaning; Weight Gain - physiology; Workloads; Canada; United States; Creatinine; Metabolic rate; Energy metabolism; Residual feed intake; Carbon dioxide; Albumin; Hepatocyte dimensions; Liver size; Histomorphometry; Cholesterol
• ISSN: 1751-0147; 0044-605X; 1751-0147
• DOI: 10.1186/s13028-017-0292-1

Feed costs are a major expense in the production of beef cattle. Individual variation in the efficiency of feed utilization may be evident through feed efficiency-related phenotypes such as those related to major energetic sinks. Our objectives were to assess the relationships between feed efficiency with liver morphometry and metabolic blood profile in feedlot beef cattle.
Two populations (A = 112 and B = 45) of steers were tested for feed efficiency. Blood from the 12 most (efficient) and 12 least feed inefficient (inefficient) steers from population A was sampled hourly over the circadian period. Blood plasma samples were submitted for analysis on albumin, aspartate aminotransferase, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase urea, cholesterol, creatinine, alkaline phosphatase, creatine kinase, lipase, carbon dioxide, β-hydroxybutyrate, acetate and bile acids. Liver tissue was also harvested from 24 steers that were blood sampled from population A and the 10 steers with divergent feed efficiency in each tail of population B was sampled for microscopy at slaughter. Photomicroscopy images were taken using the portal triad and central vein as landmarks. Histological quantifications included cross-sectional hepatocyte perimeter and area, hepatocyte nuclear area and nuclei area as proportion of the hepatocyte area. The least square means comparison between efficient and inefficient steers for productive performance and liver morphometry and for blood analytes data were analyzed using general linear model and mixed model procedures of SAS, respectively.
No differences were observed for liver weight; however, efficient steers had larger hepatocyte (i.e. hepatocyte area at the porta triad 323.31 vs. 286.37 µm
) and nuclei dimensions at portal triad and central vein regions, compared with inefficient steers. The metabolic profile indicated efficient steers had lower albumin (36.18 vs. 37.65 g/l) and cholesterol (2.62 vs. 3.05 mmol/l) and higher creatinine (118.59 vs. 110.50 mmol/l) and carbon dioxide (24.36 vs. 23.65 mmol/l) than inefficient steers.
Improved feed efficiency is associated with increased metabolism by the liver (enlarged hepatocytes and no difference on organ size), muscle (higher creatinine) and whole body (higher carbon dioxide); additionally, efficient steers had reduced bloodstream pools of albumin and cholesterol. These metabolic discrepancies between feed efficient and inefficient cattle may be determinants of productive performance.