Perceptions of hospitalized patients and their surrogate decision makers on dialysis initiation: a pilot study

• Published in: BMC nephrology Vol. 19; no. 1; p. 197
• Main Authors: Bansal, Amar D, O'Connor, Nina R, Casarett, David J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 08-08-2018; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Acute kidney injury; Analysis; Care and treatment; Continuous renal replacement therapy; Decision making; Decisional capacity; Decisional satisfaction; Dialysis; Health aspects; Hospital patients; Hospitalization; Hospitals; Illnesses; Kidney diseases; Medical records; Medicine; Mortality; Nephrology; Palliative care; Patient satisfaction; Peritoneal dialysis; Questionnaires; Renal replacement therapy; Shared decision-making; Studies; Systematic review; Dialysis; Decisional capacity; Decisional satisfaction; Acute kidney injury; Continuous renal replacement therapy; Shared decision-making
• ISSN: 1471-2369; 1471-2369
• DOI: 10.1186/s12882-018-0987-1

Dialysis is often initiated in the hospital during episodes of acute kidney injury and critical illness. Little is known about how patients or their surrogate decision makers feel about dialysis initiation in the inpatient setting.
We conducted a prospective cohort study at a large academic center in the United States. All patients who initiated dialysis during a 30-day period in 2016 were approached for enrollment. Study participants were defined as individuals who provided consent for dialysis initiation - either the patient or a surrogate decision-maker. Decisional satisfaction and the degree of shared decision-making were assessed using the decisional attitude scale and the control preferences scale, respectively. These scales were incorporated into a study questionnaire along with an exploratory structured interview.
A total of 31 potential participants were eligible and 21 agreed to participate in the study. Continuous renal replacement therapy was used in 14 out of 21 cases (67%) and there was 33% in-hospital mortality in the study cohort. A majority (62%) of patients were unable to participate in the consent process for dialysis initiation and had to rely on a surrogate decision-maker. The mean score for the decisional attitude scale was 4.1 (95% CI 3.8-4.3) with a score of 5 corresponding to high decisional satisfaction. Most of the decisions were classified as shared and incorporated input from clinicians as well as patients or surrogates. Although 90% of participants agreed that they had a choice in making the decision, 81% were unable to mention any alternatives to dialysis initiation.
Dialysis initiation was associated with high decisional satisfaction and most participants felt that the decision incorporated input from patients and providers. However, inpatient dialysis initiation was commonly associated with loss of decisional capacity and reliance on a surrogate decision-maker. This finding is likely driven by critical illness. Survivors of critical illness who remain dialysis dependent may need to revisit conversations about the rationale, risks, and benefits of dialysis.