Pre-treatment MRI minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value is a potential prognostic imaging biomarker in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation
Diffusion Weighted (DW) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has been studed in several cancers including cervical cancer. This study was designed to investigate the association of DW-MRI parameters with baseline clinical features and clinical outcomes (local regional control (LRC), disease free surviva...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC cancer Vol. 16; no. 1; p. 556 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
28-07-2016
BioMed Central |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | Diffusion Weighted (DW) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has been studed in several cancers including cervical cancer. This study was designed to investigate the association of DW-MRI parameters with baseline clinical features and clinical outcomes (local regional control (LRC), disease free survival (DFS) and disease specific survival (DSS)) in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation.
This was a retrospective study approved by an institutional review board that included 66 women with cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation who underwent pre-treatment MRI at our institution between 2012 and 2013. A region of interest (ROI) was manually drawn by one of three radiologists with experience in pelvic imaging on a single axial CT slice encompassing the widest diameter of the cervical tumor while excluding areas of necrosis. The following apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values (×10(-3) mm(2)/s) were extracted for each ROI: Minimum - ADCmin, Maximum - ADCmax, Mean - ADCmean, and Standard Deviation of the ADC - ADCdev. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were built to choose the most accurate cut off value for each ADC value. Correlation between imaging metrics and baseline clinical features were evaluated using the Mann Whitney test. Confirmatory multi-variate Cox modeling was used to test associations with LRC (adjusted by gross tumor volume - GTV), DFS and DSS (both adjusted by FIGO stage). Kaplan Meyer curves were built for DFS and DSS. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Women median age was 52 years (range 23-90). 67 % had FIGO stage I-II disease while 33 % had FIGO stage III-IV disease. Eighty-two percent had squamous cell cancer. Eighty-eight percent received concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy with radiation. Median EQD2 of external beam and brachytherapy was 82.2 Gy (range 74-84).
Women with disease staged III-IV (FIGO) had significantly higher mean ADCmax values compared with those with stage I-II (1.806 (0.4) vs 1.485 (0.4), p = 0.01). Patients with imaging defined positive nodes also had significantly higher mean (±SD) ADCmax values compared with lymph node negative patients (1.995 (0.3) vs 1.551 (0.5), p = 0.03). With a median follow-up of 32 months (range 5-43) 11 patients (17 %) have developed recurrent disease and 8 (12 %) have died because of cervical cancer. ROC curves based on DSS showed optimal cutoffs for ADCmin (0.488 × 10(-3)), ADCmean (0.827 × 10(-3)), ADCmax (1.838 × 10(-3)) and ADCdev (0.148 × 10(-3)). ADCmin higher than the cutoff was significantly associated with worse DFS (HR = 3.632-95 % CI: 1.094-12.054; p = 0.035) and DSS (HR = 4.401-95 % CI: 1.048-18.483; p = 0.043).
Pre-treatment ADCmax measured in the primary tumor may be associated with FIGO stage and lymph node status. Pre-treatment ADCmin may be a prognostic factor associated with disease-free survival and disease-specific survival in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation. Prospective validation of these findings is currently ongoing. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background Diffusion Weighted (DW) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has been studed in several cancers including cervical cancer. This study was designed to investigate the association of DW-MRI parameters with baseline clinical features and clinical outcomes (local regional control (LRC), disease free survival (DFS) and disease specific survival (DSS)) in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation. Methods This was a retrospective study approved by an institutional review board that included 66 women with cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation who underwent pre-treatment MRI at our institution between 2012 and 2013. A region of interest (ROI) was manually drawn by one of three radiologists with experience in pelvic imaging on a single axial CT slice encompassing the widest diameter of the cervical tumor while excluding areas of necrosis. The following apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values (×10-3 mm2/s) were extracted for each ROI: Minimum - ADCmin, Maximum - ADCmax, Mean - ADCmean, and Standard Deviation of the ADC - ADCdev. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were built to choose the most accurate cut off value for each ADC value. Correlation between imaging metrics and baseline clinical features were evaluated using the Mann Whitney test. Confirmatory multi-variate Cox modeling was used to test associations with LRC (adjusted by gross tumor volume - GTV), DFS and DSS (both adjusted by FIGO stage). Kaplan Meyer curves were built for DFS and DSS. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Women median age was 52 years (range 23-90). 67 % had FIGO stage I-II disease while 33 % had FIGO stage III-IV disease. Eighty-two percent had squamous cell cancer. Eighty-eight percent received concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy with radiation. Median EQD2 of external beam and brachytherapy was 82.2 Gy (range 74-84). Results Women with disease staged III-IV (FIGO) had significantly higher mean ADCmax values compared with those with stage I-II (1.806 (0.4) vs 1.485 (0.4), p = 0.01). Patients with imaging defined positive nodes also had significantly higher mean (±SD) ADCmax values compared with lymph node negative patients (1.995 (0.3) vs 1.551 (0.5), p = 0.03). With a median follow-up of 32 months (range 5-43) 11 patients (17 %) have developed recurrent disease and 8 (12 %) have died because of cervical cancer. ROC curves based on DSS showed optimal cutoffs for ADCmin (0.488 × 10-3), ADCmean (0.827 × 10-3), ADCmax (1.838 × 10-3) and ADCdev (0.148 × 10-3). ADCmin higher than the cutoff was significantly associated with worse DFS (HR = 3.632-95 % CI: 1.094-12.054; p = 0.035) and DSS (HR = 4.401-95 % CI: 1.048-18.483; p = 0.043). Conclusion Pre-treatment ADCmax measured in the primary tumor may be associated with FIGO stage and lymph node status. Pre-treatment ADCmin may be a prognostic factor associated with disease-free survival and disease-specific survival in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation. Prospective validation of these findings is currently ongoing. BACKGROUNDDiffusion Weighted (DW) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has been studed in several cancers including cervical cancer. This study was designed to investigate the association of DW-MRI parameters with baseline clinical features and clinical outcomes (local regional control (LRC), disease free survival (DFS) and disease specific survival (DSS)) in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation.METHODSThis was a retrospective study approved by an institutional review board that included 66 women with cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation who underwent pre-treatment MRI at our institution between 2012 and 2013. A region of interest (ROI) was manually drawn by one of three radiologists with experience in pelvic imaging on a single axial CT slice encompassing the widest diameter of the cervical tumor while excluding areas of necrosis. The following apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values (×10(-3) mm(2)/s) were extracted for each ROI: Minimum - ADCmin, Maximum - ADCmax, Mean - ADCmean, and Standard Deviation of the ADC - ADCdev. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were built to choose the most accurate cut off value for each ADC value. Correlation between imaging metrics and baseline clinical features were evaluated using the Mann Whitney test. Confirmatory multi-variate Cox modeling was used to test associations with LRC (adjusted by gross tumor volume - GTV), DFS and DSS (both adjusted by FIGO stage). Kaplan Meyer curves were built for DFS and DSS. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Women median age was 52 years (range 23-90). 67 % had FIGO stage I-II disease while 33 % had FIGO stage III-IV disease. Eighty-two percent had squamous cell cancer. Eighty-eight percent received concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy with radiation. Median EQD2 of external beam and brachytherapy was 82.2 Gy (range 74-84).RESULTSWomen with disease staged III-IV (FIGO) had significantly higher mean ADCmax values compared with those with stage I-II (1.806 (0.4) vs 1.485 (0.4), p = 0.01). Patients with imaging defined positive nodes also had significantly higher mean (±SD) ADCmax values compared with lymph node negative patients (1.995 (0.3) vs 1.551 (0.5), p = 0.03). With a median follow-up of 32 months (range 5-43) 11 patients (17 %) have developed recurrent disease and 8 (12 %) have died because of cervical cancer. ROC curves based on DSS showed optimal cutoffs for ADCmin (0.488 × 10(-3)), ADCmean (0.827 × 10(-3)), ADCmax (1.838 × 10(-3)) and ADCdev (0.148 × 10(-3)). ADCmin higher than the cutoff was significantly associated with worse DFS (HR = 3.632-95 % CI: 1.094-12.054; p = 0.035) and DSS (HR = 4.401-95 % CI: 1.048-18.483; p = 0.043).CONCLUSIONPre-treatment ADCmax measured in the primary tumor may be associated with FIGO stage and lymph node status. Pre-treatment ADCmin may be a prognostic factor associated with disease-free survival and disease-specific survival in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation. Prospective validation of these findings is currently ongoing. Background Diffusion Weighted (DW) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has been studed in several cancers including cervical cancer. This study was designed to investigate the association of DW-MRI parameters with baseline clinical features and clinical outcomes (local regional control (LRC), disease free survival (DFS) and disease specific survival (DSS)) in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation. Methods This was a retrospective study approved by an institutional review board that included 66 women with cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation who underwent pre-treatment MRI at our institution between 2012 and 2013. A region of interest (ROI) was manually drawn by one of three radiologists with experience in pelvic imaging on a single axial CT slice encompassing the widest diameter of the cervical tumor while excluding areas of necrosis. The following apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values (x10.sup.-3 mm.sup.2/s) were extracted for each ROI: Minimum - ADC.sub.min, Maximum - ADC.sub.max, Mean - ADC.sub.mean, and Standard Deviation of the ADC - ADC.sub.dev. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were built to choose the most accurate cut off value for each ADC value. Correlation between imaging metrics and baseline clinical features were evaluated using the Mann Whitney test. Confirmatory multi-variate Cox modeling was used to test associations with LRC (adjusted by gross tumor volume - GTV), DFS and DSS (both adjusted by FIGO stage). Kaplan Meyer curves were built for DFS and DSS. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Women median age was 52 years (range 23-90). 67 % had FIGO stage I-II disease while 33 % had FIGO stage III-IV disease. Eighty-two percent had squamous cell cancer. Eighty-eight percent received concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy with radiation. Median EQD2 of external beam and brachytherapy was 82.2 Gy (range 74-84). Results Women with disease staged III-IV (FIGO) had significantly higher mean ADC.sub.max values compared with those with stage I-II (1.806 (0.4) vs 1.485 (0.4), p = 0.01). Patients with imaging defined positive nodes also had significantly higher mean ([+ or -]SD) ADC.sub.max values compared with lymph node negative patients (1.995 (0.3) vs 1.551 (0.5), p = 0.03). With a median follow-up of 32 months (range 5-43) 11 patients (17 %) have developed recurrent disease and 8 (12 %) have died because of cervical cancer. ROC curves based on DSS showed optimal cutoffs for ADC.sub.min (0.488 x 10.sup.-3), ADC.sub.mean (0.827 x 10.sup.-3), ADC.sub.max (1.838 x 10.sup.-3) and ADC.sub.dev (0.148 x 10.sup.-3). ADC.sub.min higher than the cutoff was significantly associated with worse DFS (HR = 3.632-95 % CI: 1.094-12.054; p = 0.035) and DSS (HR = 4.401-95 % CI: 1.048-18.483; p = 0.043). Conclusion Pre-treatment ADC.sub.max measured in the primary tumor may be associated with FIGO stage and lymph node status. Pre-treatment ADC.sub.min may be a prognostic factor associated with disease-free survival and disease-specific survival in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation. Prospective validation of these findings is currently ongoing. Keywords: Cervical cancer, Diffusion weighted imaging, Chemoradiation, MRI Diffusion Weighted (DW) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has been studed in several cancers including cervical cancer. This study was designed to investigate the association of DW-MRI parameters with baseline clinical features and clinical outcomes (local regional control (LRC), disease free survival (DFS) and disease specific survival (DSS)) in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation. This was a retrospective study approved by an institutional review board that included 66 women with cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation who underwent pre-treatment MRI at our institution between 2012 and 2013. A region of interest (ROI) was manually drawn by one of three radiologists with experience in pelvic imaging on a single axial CT slice encompassing the widest diameter of the cervical tumor while excluding areas of necrosis. The following apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values (x10.sup.-3 mm.sup.2/s) were extracted for each ROI: Minimum - ADC.sub.min, Maximum - ADC.sub.max, Mean - ADC.sub.mean, and Standard Deviation of the ADC - ADC.sub.dev. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were built to choose the most accurate cut off value for each ADC value. Correlation between imaging metrics and baseline clinical features were evaluated using the Mann Whitney test. Confirmatory multi-variate Cox modeling was used to test associations with LRC (adjusted by gross tumor volume - GTV), DFS and DSS (both adjusted by FIGO stage). Kaplan Meyer curves were built for DFS and DSS. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Women with disease staged III-IV (FIGO) had significantly higher mean ADC.sub.max values compared with those with stage I-II (1.806 (0.4) vs 1.485 (0.4), p = 0.01). Patients with imaging defined positive nodes also had significantly higher mean ([+ or -]SD) ADC.sub.max values compared with lymph node negative patients (1.995 (0.3) vs 1.551 (0.5), p = 0.03). Pre-treatment ADC.sub.max measured in the primary tumor may be associated with FIGO stage and lymph node status. Pre-treatment ADC.sub.min may be a prognostic factor associated with disease-free survival and disease-specific survival in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation. Prospective validation of these findings is currently ongoing. Diffusion Weighted (DW) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has been studed in several cancers including cervical cancer. This study was designed to investigate the association of DW-MRI parameters with baseline clinical features and clinical outcomes (local regional control (LRC), disease free survival (DFS) and disease specific survival (DSS)) in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation. This was a retrospective study approved by an institutional review board that included 66 women with cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation who underwent pre-treatment MRI at our institution between 2012 and 2013. A region of interest (ROI) was manually drawn by one of three radiologists with experience in pelvic imaging on a single axial CT slice encompassing the widest diameter of the cervical tumor while excluding areas of necrosis. The following apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values (×10(-3) mm(2)/s) were extracted for each ROI: Minimum - ADCmin, Maximum - ADCmax, Mean - ADCmean, and Standard Deviation of the ADC - ADCdev. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were built to choose the most accurate cut off value for each ADC value. Correlation between imaging metrics and baseline clinical features were evaluated using the Mann Whitney test. Confirmatory multi-variate Cox modeling was used to test associations with LRC (adjusted by gross tumor volume - GTV), DFS and DSS (both adjusted by FIGO stage). Kaplan Meyer curves were built for DFS and DSS. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Women median age was 52 years (range 23-90). 67 % had FIGO stage I-II disease while 33 % had FIGO stage III-IV disease. Eighty-two percent had squamous cell cancer. Eighty-eight percent received concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy with radiation. Median EQD2 of external beam and brachytherapy was 82.2 Gy (range 74-84). Women with disease staged III-IV (FIGO) had significantly higher mean ADCmax values compared with those with stage I-II (1.806 (0.4) vs 1.485 (0.4), p = 0.01). Patients with imaging defined positive nodes also had significantly higher mean (±SD) ADCmax values compared with lymph node negative patients (1.995 (0.3) vs 1.551 (0.5), p = 0.03). With a median follow-up of 32 months (range 5-43) 11 patients (17 %) have developed recurrent disease and 8 (12 %) have died because of cervical cancer. ROC curves based on DSS showed optimal cutoffs for ADCmin (0.488 × 10(-3)), ADCmean (0.827 × 10(-3)), ADCmax (1.838 × 10(-3)) and ADCdev (0.148 × 10(-3)). ADCmin higher than the cutoff was significantly associated with worse DFS (HR = 3.632-95 % CI: 1.094-12.054; p = 0.035) and DSS (HR = 4.401-95 % CI: 1.048-18.483; p = 0.043). Pre-treatment ADCmax measured in the primary tumor may be associated with FIGO stage and lymph node status. Pre-treatment ADCmin may be a prognostic factor associated with disease-free survival and disease-specific survival in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation. Prospective validation of these findings is currently ongoing. |
ArticleNumber | 556 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Lucchesi, Fabiano Rubião Marconi, Daniel Grossi Fregnani, Jose Humberto Tavares Guerreiro Tsunoda, Audrey Tieko Netto, Ana Karina Borges Junqueira Kamrava, Mitchell Rossini, Rodrigo Ribeiro |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Daniel Grossi surname: Marconi fullname: Marconi, Daniel Grossi email: dgmarconi@gmail.com organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Antenor Duarte Villela, 1331, Barretos, Sao Paulo, 14784-400, Brazil. dgmarconi@gmail.com – sequence: 2 givenname: Jose Humberto Tavares Guerreiro surname: Fregnani fullname: Fregnani, Jose Humberto Tavares Guerreiro organization: Department of Gynecology Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Sao Paulo, Brazil – sequence: 3 givenname: Rodrigo Ribeiro surname: Rossini fullname: Rossini, Rodrigo Ribeiro organization: Department of Radiology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Sao Paulo, Brazil – sequence: 4 givenname: Ana Karina Borges Junqueira surname: Netto fullname: Netto, Ana Karina Borges Junqueira organization: Department of Radiology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Sao Paulo, Brazil – sequence: 5 givenname: Fabiano Rubião surname: Lucchesi fullname: Lucchesi, Fabiano Rubião organization: Department of Radiology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Sao Paulo, Brazil – sequence: 6 givenname: Audrey Tieko surname: Tsunoda fullname: Tsunoda, Audrey Tieko organization: Department of Gynecology Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Sao Paulo, Brazil – sequence: 7 givenname: Mitchell surname: Kamrava fullname: Kamrava, Mitchell organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27469349$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNptkttu1DAQhiNURNuFB-AGWUJCcJFi5-wbpKrisFIRqMC15Tjj7JTETm1ngYfiHXHYUnYR9oWt8Tf_jO3_NDky1kCSPGb0jLGmeulZ1jRlSlmVZhXjKb2XnLCiZmlW0Ppob3-cnHp_TSmrG9o8SI6zuqh4XvCT5OdHB2lwIMMIJpD3V2syosFxHomcJumWYIdazx6tIcqC1qhwiW7lMANBTySZbIgRlAOZnO2N9QEVwVH2aHrSoh2l-wqOYBQAt0UVQSVN3JNJhkXMk98tQEe-YdiQDnTsIeAWiNrAaJ3sMILWPEzuazl4eHS7rpIvb15_vniXXn54u744v0xVWfKQtgUvM9nQvANQqq255k1eaAVVXpWNVHG0jNI27-qsLVlWqU5VNZRVUQNvtM5Xyaud7jS3I3QqtujkICYXL-V-CCtRHJ4Y3IjebkXBY4FYbJU8vxVw9mYGH8SIXsEwSAN29oI1tOaU5rSK6NN_0Gs7OxOvt6OyktP6L9XLAQQabWNdtYiK8_iXGcuKmkfq7D9UnB2MqKJ5NMb4QcKLg4TIBPgeejl7L9afrg7ZZ3vsBuQQNt4O8_Ix_hBkO1A5670DffdwjIrFuGJnXBGNKxbjChpznuy_-F3GH6fmvwC6Yu35 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ctro_2018_09_002 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0294976 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40944_022_00614_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rpor_2020_08_008 crossref_primary_10_1177_0284185118786062 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_018_4606_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brachy_2017_05_010 crossref_primary_10_1177_0284185120926897 crossref_primary_10_37549_AR2484 crossref_primary_10_1136_ijgc_2021_002806 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2021_109787 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radonc_2022_09_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radonc_2020_09_059 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_semradonc_2019_09_001 crossref_primary_10_1097_CCO_0000000000000385 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13244_022_01269_6 crossref_primary_10_1186_s41747_017_0014_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_017_4873_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2023_111181 crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_24905 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_3409487 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13244_017_0567_0 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_019_6344_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brachy_2020_07_014 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 10.1007/s00330-004-2529-4 10.1016/j.mri.2014.05.009 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.05.001 10.1002/jmri.22236 10.1007/s00259-013-2668-4 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09520-X 10.1007/s00259-015-3112-8 10.1007/s11547-011-0650-4 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.07.123 10.1148/radiol.2483071407 10.1593/neo.81328 10.1002/cncr.21527 10.1007/s00330-007-0843-3 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.03.024 10.1002/cncr.22974 10.1093/aje/kwk052 10.1259/bjr/29739265 10.3322/caac.21262 10.1056/NEJMoa1309748 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.02.004 10.1007/s00330-005-0133-x 10.1016/j.neurad.2007.04.002 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00208-6 10.1007/s00259-011-1978-7 10.1002/jmri.23830 10.1002/jmri.22838 10.1148/radiol.2015150400 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31819e93af 10.1002/cncr.24972 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2016 BioMed Central Ltd. Copyright BioMed Central 2016 The Author(s). 2016 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2016 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: Copyright BioMed Central 2016 – notice: The Author(s). 2016 |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION ISR 3V. 7TO 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH H94 K9. M0S M1P PIMPY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1186/s12885-016-2619-0 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef Science In Context ProQuest Central (Corporate) Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) PML(ProQuest Medical Library) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: ECM name: MEDLINE url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1471-2407 |
EndPage | 556 |
ExternalDocumentID | 4134081251 A469212479 10_1186_s12885_016_2619_0 27469349 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | Brazil |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Brazil |
GroupedDBID | --- -A0 0R~ 23N 2WC 3V. 4.4 53G 5VS 6J9 6PF 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AAWTL ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACMJI ACPRK ACRMQ ADBBV ADINQ ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHSBF AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C24 C6C CCPQU CGR CS3 CUY CVF DIK DU5 E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS ECM EIF EJD EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 H13 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR IHW INH INR ISR ITC KQ8 M1P M48 M~E NPM O5R O5S OK1 P2P PGMZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SBL SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS U2A UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB AAYXX CITATION AFGXO 7TO 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO H94 K9. PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c559t-b4952a803deeccb79f9834fce63658accccb100b3d72b5126cdc67e5647e98ff3 |
IEDL.DBID | RPM |
ISSN | 1471-2407 |
IngestDate | Tue Sep 17 21:09:14 EDT 2024 Sat Oct 26 01:13:49 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 18:24:24 EDT 2024 Tue Nov 19 21:31:13 EST 2024 Tue Nov 12 23:34:21 EST 2024 Sat Sep 28 21:18:15 EDT 2024 Tue Aug 13 02:41:14 EDT 2024 Thu Sep 12 17:47:37 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 28 07:59:04 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | MRI Diffusion weighted imaging Chemoradiation Cervical cancer |
Language | English |
License | Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c559t-b4952a803deeccb79f9834fce63658accccb100b3d72b5126cdc67e5647e98ff3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4965898/ |
PMID | 27469349 |
PQID | 1807925907 |
PQPubID | 44074 |
PageCount | 1 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4965898 proquest_miscellaneous_1807900306 proquest_journals_1807925907 gale_infotracmisc_A469212479 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A469212479 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A469212479 gale_healthsolutions_A469212479 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_016_2619_0 pubmed_primary_27469349 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2016-07-28 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-07-28 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2016 text: 2016-07-28 day: 28 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | BMC cancer |
PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Cancer |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central |
References | 24970025 - Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Oct;32(8):993-1000 24463908 - Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 May;41(5):898-905 22892362 - Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Dec;127(3):478-83 21424319 - Radiol Med. 2011 Aug;116(5):766-80 12147376 - Lancet. 2002 Jul 27;360(9329):307-8 24517875 - Gynecol Oncol. 2014 May;133(2):256-62 12829130 - Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Jul 15;56(4):958-65 25998804 - Radiother Oncol. 2015 Jun;115(3):379-85 18710982 - Radiology. 2008 Sep;248(3):894-900 15538578 - Eur Radiol. 2005 Jan;15(1):71-8 16557366 - Eur Radiol. 2006 Jul;16(7):1468-77 26173619 - Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Nov;42(12):1825-32 22072286 - Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012 Feb;39(2):283-90 23023940 - J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Feb;37(2):431-4 19186405 - Neoplasia. 2009 Feb;11(2):102-25 17182981 - Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Mar 15;165(6):710-8 16270319 - Cancer. 2005 Dec 1;104(11):2484-91 18193428 - Eur Radiol. 2008 May;18(5):1058-64 24767630 - Eur J Radiol. 2014 Jul;83(7):1169-76 20108309 - Cancer. 2010 Mar 15;116(6):1469-75 24552320 - N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 20;370(8):734-43 25651787 - CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108 17568674 - J Neuroradiol. 2007 Jul;34(3):183-9 10383089 - MAGMA. 1999 Mar;8(1):20-6 17786947 - Cancer. 2007 Oct 15;110(8):1738-44 22434697 - J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Apr;35(4):745-63 26505922 - Radiology. 2016 Apr;279(1):158-66 20677265 - J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Aug;32(2):376-82 19940650 - J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009 Nov-Dec;33(6):858-62 16793851 - Br J Radiol. 2006 Aug;79(944):633-5 19097774 - Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47 MP Schmid (2619_CR2) 2014; 133 AF DeVries (2619_CR26) 2003; 56 JJ Park (2619_CR32) 2014; 32 S Siva (2619_CR7) 2015; 42 S Rizzo (2619_CR13) 2011; 116 KV Lund (2619_CR17) 2015; 115 JP Hoogendam (2619_CR30) 2010; 32 A Gladwish (2619_CR16) 2016; 279 KS Tewari (2619_CR3) 2014; 370 E Vittinghoff (2619_CR31) 2007; 165 EA Kidd (2619_CR5) 2010; 116 Y Liu (2619_CR14) 2009; 33 PZ McVeigh (2619_CR12) 2008; 18 Y Cui (2619_CR27) 2008; 248 S Naganawa (2619_CR20) 2005; 15 H Sun (2619_CR11) 2014; 41 SP Li (2619_CR28) 2012; 35 EA Kidd (2619_CR6) 2007; 110 DM Koh (2619_CR23) 2006; 79 K Nakamura (2619_CR29) 2012; 39 EA Eisenhauer (2619_CR19) 2009; 45 JD Wright (2619_CR22) 2005; 104 2619_CR4 AA Abdel Razek (2619_CR10) 2006; 16 L Frederick (2619_CR21) 2002 LA Torre (2619_CR1) 2015; 65 N Matsushima (2619_CR9) 2007; 34 AR Padhani (2619_CR18) 2009; 11 K Nakamura (2619_CR33) 2012; 127 L Lemaire (2619_CR24) 1999; 8 M Miccò (2619_CR15) 2014; 83 A Dzik-Jurasz (2619_CR25) 2002; 360 JR Olsen (2619_CR8) 2013; 37 |
References_xml | – volume: 45 start-page: 228 issue: 2 year: 2009 ident: 2619_CR19 publication-title: Eur J Cancer doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 contributor: fullname: EA Eisenhauer – volume-title: AJCC cancer staging manual year: 2002 ident: 2619_CR21 contributor: fullname: L Frederick – volume: 15 start-page: 71 year: 2005 ident: 2619_CR20 publication-title: Eur Radiol doi: 10.1007/s00330-004-2529-4 contributor: fullname: S Naganawa – volume: 8 start-page: 20 year: 1999 ident: 2619_CR24 publication-title: Magma contributor: fullname: L Lemaire – volume: 32 start-page: 993 year: 2014 ident: 2619_CR32 publication-title: Magn Reson Imaging doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.05.009 contributor: fullname: JJ Park – volume: 115 start-page: 379 issue: 3 year: 2015 ident: 2619_CR17 publication-title: Radiother Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.05.001 contributor: fullname: KV Lund – volume: 32 start-page: 376 year: 2010 ident: 2619_CR30 publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging doi: 10.1002/jmri.22236 contributor: fullname: JP Hoogendam – volume: 41 start-page: 898 issue: 5 year: 2014 ident: 2619_CR11 publication-title: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2668-4 contributor: fullname: H Sun – volume: 360 start-page: 307 year: 2002 ident: 2619_CR25 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09520-X contributor: fullname: A Dzik-Jurasz – volume: 42 start-page: 1825 issue: 12 year: 2015 ident: 2619_CR7 publication-title: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3112-8 contributor: fullname: S Siva – volume: 116 start-page: 766 year: 2011 ident: 2619_CR13 publication-title: Radiol Med doi: 10.1007/s11547-011-0650-4 contributor: fullname: S Rizzo – volume: 127 start-page: 478 year: 2012 ident: 2619_CR33 publication-title: Gynecol Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.07.123 contributor: fullname: K Nakamura – volume: 248 start-page: 894 year: 2008 ident: 2619_CR27 publication-title: Radiology doi: 10.1148/radiol.2483071407 contributor: fullname: Y Cui – volume: 11 start-page: 102 year: 2009 ident: 2619_CR18 publication-title: Neoplasia doi: 10.1593/neo.81328 contributor: fullname: AR Padhani – volume: 104 start-page: 2484 year: 2005 ident: 2619_CR22 publication-title: Cancer doi: 10.1002/cncr.21527 contributor: fullname: JD Wright – ident: 2619_CR4 – volume: 18 start-page: 1058 year: 2008 ident: 2619_CR12 publication-title: Eur Radiol doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0843-3 contributor: fullname: PZ McVeigh – volume: 83 start-page: 1169 year: 2014 ident: 2619_CR15 publication-title: Eur J Radiol doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.03.024 contributor: fullname: M Miccò – volume: 110 start-page: 1738 issue: 8 year: 2007 ident: 2619_CR6 publication-title: Cancer doi: 10.1002/cncr.22974 contributor: fullname: EA Kidd – volume: 165 start-page: 710 issue: 6 year: 2007 ident: 2619_CR31 publication-title: Am J Epidemiol doi: 10.1093/aje/kwk052 contributor: fullname: E Vittinghoff – volume: 79 start-page: 633 year: 2006 ident: 2619_CR23 publication-title: Br J Radiol doi: 10.1259/bjr/29739265 contributor: fullname: DM Koh – volume: 65 start-page: 87 issue: 2 year: 2015 ident: 2619_CR1 publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin doi: 10.3322/caac.21262 contributor: fullname: LA Torre – volume: 370 start-page: 734 issue: 8 year: 2014 ident: 2619_CR3 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1309748 contributor: fullname: KS Tewari – volume: 133 start-page: 256 issue: 2 year: 2014 ident: 2619_CR2 publication-title: Gynecol Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.02.004 contributor: fullname: MP Schmid – volume: 16 start-page: 1468 year: 2006 ident: 2619_CR10 publication-title: Eur Radiol doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-0133-x contributor: fullname: AA Abdel Razek – volume: 34 start-page: 183 year: 2007 ident: 2619_CR9 publication-title: J Neuroradiol doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2007.04.002 contributor: fullname: N Matsushima – volume: 56 start-page: 958 year: 2003 ident: 2619_CR26 publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00208-6 contributor: fullname: AF DeVries – volume: 39 start-page: 283 year: 2012 ident: 2619_CR29 publication-title: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1978-7 contributor: fullname: K Nakamura – volume: 37 start-page: 431 issue: 2 year: 2013 ident: 2619_CR8 publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging doi: 10.1002/jmri.23830 contributor: fullname: JR Olsen – volume: 35 start-page: 745 issue: 4 year: 2012 ident: 2619_CR28 publication-title: J Magn Reson Imaging doi: 10.1002/jmri.22838 contributor: fullname: SP Li – volume: 279 start-page: 158 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: 2619_CR16 publication-title: Radiology doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015150400 contributor: fullname: A Gladwish – volume: 33 start-page: 858 year: 2009 ident: 2619_CR14 publication-title: J Comput Assist Tomogr doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31819e93af contributor: fullname: Y Liu – volume: 116 start-page: 1469 issue: 6 year: 2010 ident: 2619_CR5 publication-title: Cancer doi: 10.1002/cncr.24972 contributor: fullname: EA Kidd |
SSID | ssj0017808 |
Score | 2.3682487 |
Snippet | Diffusion Weighted (DW) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has been studed in several cancers including cervical cancer. This study was designed to investigate... Background Diffusion Weighted (DW) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has been studed in several cancers including cervical cancer. This study was designed to... BACKGROUNDDiffusion Weighted (DW) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has been studed in several cancers including cervical cancer. This study was designed to... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest gale crossref pubmed |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 556 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Area Under Curve Cancer Care and treatment Cervical cancer Chemoradiotherapy Chemotherapy Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Disease-Free Survival Female Humans Kaplan-Meier Estimate Magnetic resonance imaging Middle Aged Patient outcomes Prognosis Proportional Hazards Models Radioisotope brachytherapy Retrospective Studies Risk factors ROC Curve Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - mortality Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - therapy Young Adult |
Title | Pre-treatment MRI minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value is a potential prognostic imaging biomarker in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiation |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27469349 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1807925907 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1807900306 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4965898 |
Volume | 16 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELbYHhAXxJtAKQYhISG5m4cTO8eqtKKHRVULEjcrsR2IRJLVZvOz-h874zjRhiN7jCe7Xs2Mx2N_8w0hn6JCaittxSCccMatLliR5jEzCVZ15m7bj0cXt-L7L_n1Amly0qkWxoH2dVmftn-b07b-47CV20avJ5zY-npzjhznMpfrFVnB3nBK0f3VgZCh9NeXkczWPSzAEvFpGcNkgWHrN8jEsjxB-syDWPTvinwQkpZwyYP4c_mEPPYbR3o2TvApeWDbZ-Thxl-NPyd31zvLZtg43dxcUaQNaYaGFluEmcND7IYy4PEY1Z113BH4FPm-La17WtBtt0f0EPwO4rbaDkmcad24TkYUK_URzLOjNXyBW2NAUKPZ7KjnZ-2pm4I1FA94qbFVPaKTKBhHA-ZmRlN4QX5eXvw4_8Z8LwamIefYsxISqbiQYWIsKL0UeZXLhFfaZgnootDwKaMwLBMj4hI2EZk2OhM2zbiwuayq5CU5arvWviYUmyPpONImLhNeijRPNI-5KYzgPE21DciXSStqO1JuKJeqyEyN2lQIS0NtqjAg71Fvaqwand1VnYGGISpzkQfko5NAsosW0TS_i6Hv1dXtzULosxeqOtCxLnxxAswY-bEWkscLSfBGvRyeDEj51aBXkQxFDnlmKALyYR7GNxHh1tpu8DIugwvIq9He5n8_2WtAxMISZwHkCF-OgOs4rnDvKm_--8235FGMzhMKFstjcrTfDfYdWfVmOHHnFyfO--4BbRM3nA |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,729,782,786,866,887,27933,27934,53800,53802 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
linkToHtml | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3bbtQwELVokYAX7pdAoQYhISG5m7udx6q06opuVbVF4s1KbAcikWS12XwW_8iM40QbHruP8WTX2ZyxPfaZM4R8DnKhjDAlg-kkZrFROcuTLGQ6wqzOzC77cevihl_-FN9OUSYnGXNhLGlfFdVR86c-aqrfllu5rtVi5IktrlYnqHEuMrHYI_fBX31_DNLd4QEXvnAHmIFIFx0MwQIZainDcIFh8TeIxdIsQgHNndno_zF5Z1KaEyZ3ZqCzJ3fs-1Py2C056fHQ_IzcM81z8mDlDtVfkL9XG8MmwjldXS8pCo7UfU3zNRLU4SLWUelxY42q1ljVCbyKSuGGVh3N6brdIu8IfgcZX02L8s-0qm0NJIo5_kgD2tAKvsCOTmCoEHAb6pRdO2q7YDTFrWGqTVkNvCYKsKoBqHoA0Uvy4-z09uScuSoOTEG0smUFhGBhLvxIG4BLwbMyE1FcKpNG8E_kCj5F4PtFpHlYwPIjVVql3CRpzE0myjJ6RfabtjFvCMWySioMlA6LKC54kkUqDmOdax7HSaKMR76Ob1OuB7EOaYMckcoBBRIJbYgC6XvkEN-3HPJNJ0eXx4AMmM9jnnnkk7VAmYwGeTi_8r7r5PLmemb0xRmVLWBD5S6tAXqMylozy4OZJfixmjePwJNuHOlkIHyeQYTqc498nJrxTuTGNabtnY2N_TzyesDp9PQjzj3CZwieDFBdfN4CwLUq4w6ob-985yF5eH67upAXy8vv78ijEB3Q5ywUB2R_u-nNe7LX6f6D9d1_cyFMQA |
linkToPdf | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1bb9MwFLbYkCZexp0FBjMICQnJa5qbncdpW0UFnaoNJN6sxHYgErmoaX4W_5FzHDdqeIQ-xiet03zHx8f-_B1C3s8zoYwwBYNwErHIqIxlcRowHeKpztRO-3Hp4o7ffBdX1yiTM5b6sqR9lZfn9a_qvC5_Wm5lW6nZjic2W68uUeNcpGLW6mJ2QO6Dz_rBLlF3Gwhc-MJtYs5FMutgGBbIUksYpgwMC8BBPpakIYpo7kWkv8flvcA0JU3uRaHFw__o_yNy7Kae9GIweUzumfoJOVq5zfWn5Pd6Y9hIPKer2yVF4ZGqr2jWIlEdLmI9lR4X2KhqjFWfwKuoGG5o2dGMts0W-UfwO8j8qhuUgaZlZWshUTzrj3SgDS3hC-woBYYKgbehTuG1o7YLRlNcIqbaFOXAb6IArwoAqwcwPSPfFtdfLz8xV82BKchatiyHVCzIhB9qA7DJeVqkIowKZZIQ_o1MwSef-34eah7kMA1JlFYJN3EScZOKogifk8O6qc0JoVheSQVzpYM8jHIep6GKgkhnmkdRHCvjkY-7NyrbQbRD2mRHJHJAgkRiGyJB-h45w3cuh3Ono8PLC0AHxPWIpx55Zy1QLqNGPs6PrO86uby7nRh9cEZFA_hQmTveAD1Gha2J5enEEvxZTZt34JNuPOnkXPg8hUzV5x55OzbjnciRq03TOxubA3rkxYDV8el3WPcIn6B4NECV8WkLgNeqjTuwvvznO8_I0fpqIb8sbz6_Ig8C9EGfs0CcksPtpjevyUGn-zfWff8AqDFOwA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pre-treatment+MRI+minimum+apparent+diffusion+coefficient+value+is+a+potential+prognostic+imaging+biomarker+in+cervical+cancer+patients+treated+with+definitive+chemoradiation&rft.jtitle=BMC+cancer&rft.au=Daniel+Grossi+Marconi&rft.au=Jose+Humberto+Tavares+Guerreiro+Fregnani&rft.au=Rodrigo+Ribeiro+Rossini&rft.au=Ana+Karina+Borges+Junqueira+Netto&rft.date=2016-07-28&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1471-2407&rft.volume=16&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12885-016-2619-0&rft.externalDocID=4134081251 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2407&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2407&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2407&client=summon |