Use of Integrative, Complementary, and Alternative Medicine in Children with Epilepsy: A Global Scoping Review

(1) Background: Epilepsy is one of the most common chronic neurological disorders in childhood. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use is highly prevalent in patients with epilepsy. Despite CAM's widespread and increasing popularity, its prevalence, forms, perceived benefits, and pote...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Children (Basel) Vol. 10; no. 4; p. 713
Main Authors: Zhu, Zahra, Dluzynski, Daniela, Hammad, Nouran, Pugalenthi, Deepika, Walser, Sarah A, Mittal, Rea, Samanta, Debopam, Brown, Melanie L, Asadi-Pooya, Ali A, Kakooza-Mwesige, Angelina, Spalice, Alberto, Capponi, Martina, Lekoubou, Alain, Kumar, Ashutosh, Paudel, Sita, Carney, Paul R, Mainali, Gayatra, Naik, Sunil
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 01-04-2023
MDPI
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:(1) Background: Epilepsy is one of the most common chronic neurological disorders in childhood. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use is highly prevalent in patients with epilepsy. Despite CAM's widespread and increasing popularity, its prevalence, forms, perceived benefits, and potential risks in pediatric epilepsy are rarely explored. (2) Methods: We performed a scoping review of the available literature on the use of CAM in pediatric epilepsy. (3) Results: Overall, global cross-sectional studies showed a variable degree of CAM usage among children with epilepsy, ranging from 13 to 44% in prevalence. Popular types of CAMs reported were supplements, cannabis products, aromatherapy, herbal remedies, dietary therapy, massage therapy, and prayer. Families often report that CAM is effective, although there are limited objective measures of this. Potential risks lie in the use of CAM, such as herbal remedies, and/or unregulated, contaminated, or unpurified products. Studies also underscored inadequate patient-physician discussions regarding CAM. (4) Conclusions: A better understanding of this topic would aid clinicians in guiding patients/families on the use of CAM. Further studies on the efficacy of the different types of CAM used, as well as potential side effects and drug interactions are needed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:2227-9067
2227-9067
DOI:10.3390/children10040713