A Decision Analysis of Streptokinase plus Heparin as Compared with Heparin Alone for Deep-Vein Thrombosis

It is uncertain whether patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis are better treated with streptokinase plus intravenous heparin or with heparin alone 1 – 10 . One review article 4 citing no increased risk of major bleeding and one meta-analysis 6 citing uncertain benefits and a relative risk of 2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The New England journal of medicine Vol. 330; no. 26; pp. 1864 - 1869
Main Authors: O'Meara, James J, McNutt, Robert A, Evans, Arthur T, Moore, Stacy W, Downs, Stephen M
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Boston, MA Massachusetts Medical Society 30-06-1994
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:It is uncertain whether patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis are better treated with streptokinase plus intravenous heparin or with heparin alone 1 – 10 . One review article 4 citing no increased risk of major bleeding and one meta-analysis 6 citing uncertain benefits and a relative risk of 2.9 for major bleeding have drawn opposite conclusions about the value of streptokinase. The National Institutes of Health issued a consensus statement supporting the use of streptokinase plus heparin 7 . A more recent review article suggested that the decision to use streptokinase must be made on an individual basis, but it did not define the types . . .
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJM199406303302605