A Decision Analysis of Streptokinase plus Heparin as Compared with Heparin Alone for Deep-Vein Thrombosis
It is uncertain whether patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis are better treated with streptokinase plus intravenous heparin or with heparin alone 1 – 10 . One review article 4 citing no increased risk of major bleeding and one meta-analysis 6 citing uncertain benefits and a relative risk of 2...
Saved in:
Published in: | The New England journal of medicine Vol. 330; no. 26; pp. 1864 - 1869 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Boston, MA
Massachusetts Medical Society
30-06-1994
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | It is uncertain whether patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis are better treated with streptokinase plus intravenous heparin or with heparin alone
1
–
10
. One review article
4
citing no increased risk of major bleeding and one meta-analysis
6
citing uncertain benefits and a relative risk of 2.9 for major bleeding have drawn opposite conclusions about the value of streptokinase. The National Institutes of Health issued a consensus statement supporting the use of streptokinase plus heparin
7
. A more recent review article suggested that the decision to use streptokinase must be made on an individual basis, but it did not define the types . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJM199406303302605 |