Sampling precautions for the measurement of nitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in ambient air

• Published in: Atmospheric environment (1994) Vol. 41; no. 23; pp. 4988 - 4994
• Main Authors: Albinet, A., Leoz-Garziandia, E., Budzinski, H., ViIlenave, E.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01-07-2007; Elsevier Science
• Subjects: Analysis methods; Applied sciences; Atmospheric pollution; Exact sciences and technology; Nitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Oxygenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Pollution; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Sampling artefacts; Sampling artefacts; Oxygenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Nitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Hydrocarbon; Cascade impactor; Artefact; Urban area; Polycyclic aromatic compound; Oxygen heterocycle; Mutagen; Operating conditions; Case study; Concentration measurement; Carcinogen; Sampler; Sample conservation; Air pollution; Poison; Measurement accuracy; Sampling; Comparative study; Oxygen nitrogen heterocycle
• ISSN: 1352-2310; 1873-2844
• DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.01.061

Because of the toxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and of their oxidation products, such as nitrated and oxygenated PAHs (NPAHs and OPAHs), the determination of their concentrations is of great interest in terms of atmospheric pollution control. Then, normalisation of sampling procedures appears essential. In this context, this paper presents a comparison of particulate PAH, OPAH and NPAH concentrations determined with two different samplers (cascade impactor and conventional high volume sampler) installed in parallel during several field sampling campaigns carried out under different environmental conditions. For winter and summer periods, the PAH and OPAH concentrations determined with both sampling systems were considered as equivalent. In the summer period, NPAH concentrations quantified with both sampling devices were similar whereas in the winter period, the conventional high volume sampler underestimated their concentrations by a factor of 3–4. This underestimation was observed in the same proportion for all the 17 quantified NPAHs. Analytical error, NPAH formation during the sampling and NPAH degradation by reaction with gaseous oxidants associated to sampling methodology were unable to explain such differences between both samplers used in parallel. A probable hypothesis is that the heating of the
PM
10
head of the high volume sampler in the winter period generates an increase of the internal sampler temperature that could intensify the chemical degradation of the NPAHs inducing the underestimation of their concentrations in the atmosphere. Further investigations will be necessary to confirm the importance of the temperature on the chemical degradation of these compounds and to understand the different behaviour of PAHs and OPAHs. Consequently, we suggest using oxidant scrubber to prevent chemical degradation of PAHs and derivatives during their sampling. Moreover, we advise against the heating of the sampling head which could induce an increase of these reactions of degradation especially for NPAHs.