Studying auditory verbal hallucinations using the RDoC framework
In this paper, I explain why I adopted a Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) approach to study the neurobiology of auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH), or voices. I explain that the RDoC construct of “agency” fits well with AVH phenomenology. To the extent that voices sound nonself, voice hearers lack...
Saved in:
Published in: | Psychophysiology Vol. 53; no. 3; pp. 298 - 304 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-03-2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In this paper, I explain why I adopted a Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) approach to study the neurobiology of auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH), or voices. I explain that the RDoC construct of “agency” fits well with AVH phenomenology. To the extent that voices sound nonself, voice hearers lack a sense of agency over the voices. Using a vocalization paradigm like those used with nonhuman primates to study mechanisms subserving the sense of agency, we find that the auditory N1 ERP is suppressed during vocalization, that EEG synchrony preceding speech onset is related to N1 suppression, and that both are reduced in patients with schizophrenia. Reduced cortical suppression is also seen across multiple psychotic disorders and in clinically high‐risk youth, but it is not related to AVH. The motor activity preceding talking and connectivity between frontal and temporal lobes during talking have both proved sensitive to AVH, suggesting neural activity and connectivity associated with intentions to act may be a better way to study agency and predictions based on agency. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:PSYP12457 National Institute of Mental Health - No. MH-58262 ark:/67375/WNG-1XL7MF5M-H Department of Veterans Affairs - No. I01CX000497 istex:8AD3ED7734ED243AC6F9A95A25247CC36DA34565 This work was supported by grants to JMF from Department of Veterans Affairs (I01CX000497) and National Institute of Mental Health (MH‐58262). I would like to thank all of my coauthors of the work discussed in this paper. Special thanks go to Daniel H. Mathalon for on‐going inspiration and intellectual guidance, Brian J. Roach for making it all happen and his inspired data analysis, John Sweeney and his team for collecting data with our paradigm at his BSNIP site at the University of Illinois in Chicago, James Reilly for the heritability analysis of the BSNIP data, Jun Wang for his MRI‐guided source analysis of the BSNIP data, Chi‐Ming Chen for his analysis of the intracranial data, Veronica Perez for her analysis of the data from the clinical high‐risk sample, Theda Heinks for her work on the pitch perturbation paradigm, Kevin Sitek for his work on the naturalistic formant variation analysis, Vanessa Palzes for her work on the button press paradigms, and to all the patients and their families for participating in this research. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0048-5772 1469-8986 1540-5958 |
DOI: | 10.1111/psyp.12457 |