How climate, migration ability and habitat fragmentation affect the projected future distribution of European beech
Recent efforts to incorporate migration processes into species distribution models (SDMs) are allowing assessments of whether species are likely to be able to track their future climate optimum and the possible causes of failing to do so. Here, we projected the range shift of European beech over the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Global change biology Vol. 21; no. 2; pp. 897 - 910 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
England
Blackwell Science
01-02-2015
Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Recent efforts to incorporate migration processes into species distribution models (SDMs) are allowing assessments of whether species are likely to be able to track their future climate optimum and the possible causes of failing to do so. Here, we projected the range shift of European beech over the 21st century using a process‐based SDM coupled to a phenomenological migration model accounting for population dynamics, according to two climate change scenarios and one land use change scenario. Our model predicts that the climatically suitable habitat for European beech will shift north‐eastward and upward mainly because (i) higher temperature and precipitation, at the northern range margins, will increase survival and fruit maturation success, while (ii) lower precipitations and higher winter temperature, at the southern range margins, will increase drought mortality and prevent bud dormancy breaking. Beech colonization rate of newly climatically suitable habitats in 2100 is projected to be very low (1–2% of the newly suitable habitats colonised). Unexpectedly, the projected realized contraction rate was higher than the projected potential contraction rate. As a result, the realized distribution of beech is projected to strongly contract by 2100 (by 36–61%) mainly due to a substantial increase in climate variability after 2050, which generates local extinctions, even at the core of the distribution, the frequency of which prevents beech recolonization during more favourable years. Although European beech will be able to persist in some parts of the trailing edge of its distribution, the combined effects of climate and land use changes, limited migration ability, and a slow life‐history are likely to increase its threat status in the near future. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12771 ArticleID:GCB12771 French Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ANR project - No. 2009 PEXT 001105 SCION Section S1. Parameterization of PHENOFIT in this study. Section S2. Coupling PHENOFIT and the Gibbs-based model. Section S3. The Gibbs' interaction potential function (IPF). Section S4. Simulated cohorts' age pattern. Section S5. The variation partitioning analysis. Section S6. Migration rates. Section S7. Biological processes limiting fitness. Section S8. Variations of annual temperature in Europe. Section S9. Future land cover changes under A1Fi-Gras scenario. ANR EVORANGE - No. ANR-09-PEXT-01102 istex:216AE1277982169C1DEA60B630523CF3D09137A2 ark:/67375/WNG-FJJGF010-C ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1354-1013 1365-2486 |
DOI: | 10.1111/gcb.12771 |