Comparing definitions of outpatient surgery: Implications for quality measurement

Abstract Background Adverse event (AE) rates in outpatient surgery are inconsistently reported, partly because of the lack of a standard definition of outpatient surgery. We compared the types and rates of surgical procedures defined by two national healthcare agencies: Health Care Cost Institute (H...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of surgery Vol. 214; no. 2; pp. 186 - 192
Main Authors: Mull, Hillary J, Rivard, Peter E, Legler, Aaron, Pizer, Steven D, Hawn, Mary T, Itani, Kamal M.F, Rosen, Amy K
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-08-2017
Elsevier Limited
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Adverse event (AE) rates in outpatient surgery are inconsistently reported, partly because of the lack of a standard definition of outpatient surgery. We compared the types and rates of surgical procedures defined by two national healthcare agencies: Health Care Cost Institute (HCCI) and the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) and considered implications for quality measurement. Methods We used HCCI and HCUP definitions to identify FY2012-14 VA outpatient surgeries. Results There were six times as many HCCI surgeries as HCUP (6,575,830 versus 1,086,640). Ninety-nine percent of HCUP-defined surgeries were also identified by HCCI. More HCUP surgeries had higher average Medicare Relative Value Units then HCCI surgeries [5.3 (SD = 4.4) versus 1.6 (SD = 2.3) RVUs]. Conclusions Rates and types of procedures vary widely between definitions. Quality measurement using HCCI versus HCUP may produce significantly lower AE rates because many of the surgeries included reflect low complexity and potentially low risk of AEs.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.01.021