A Noncooperative View of Consistent Bankruptcy Rules

We introduce a game form that captures a noncooperative dimension of the consistency property of bankruptcy rules. Any consistent and monotone rule is fully characterized by a bilateral principle and consistency. Like the consistency axiom, our game form, together with a bilateral principle, yields...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Games and economic behavior Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 55 - 72
Main Authors: Dagan, Nir, Serrano, Roberto, Volij, Oscar
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Inc 01-01-1997
Elsevier
Series:Games and Economic Behavior
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We introduce a game form that captures a noncooperative dimension of the consistency property of bankruptcy rules. Any consistent and monotone rule is fully characterized by a bilateral principle and consistency. Like the consistency axiom, our game form, together with a bilateral principle, yields the corresponding consistent bankruptcy rule as a result of a unique outcome of Nash equilibria. The result holds for a large class of consistent and monotone rules, including the Constrained Equal Award, the Propositional Rule, and many other well known rules. Moreover, all of the subgame perefect equilibria are coalition-proof in the associated game in strategic form.Journal of Economic LiteratureClassification Numbers: C72 and D63.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0899-8256
1090-2473
DOI:10.1006/game.1997.0526