A Noncooperative View of Consistent Bankruptcy Rules
We introduce a game form that captures a noncooperative dimension of the consistency property of bankruptcy rules. Any consistent and monotone rule is fully characterized by a bilateral principle and consistency. Like the consistency axiom, our game form, together with a bilateral principle, yields...
Saved in:
Published in: | Games and economic behavior Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 55 - 72 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier Inc
01-01-1997
Elsevier |
Series: | Games and Economic Behavior |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We introduce a game form that captures a noncooperative dimension of the consistency property of bankruptcy rules. Any consistent and monotone rule is fully characterized by a bilateral principle and consistency. Like the consistency axiom, our game form, together with a bilateral principle, yields the corresponding consistent bankruptcy rule as a result of a unique outcome of Nash equilibria. The result holds for a large class of consistent and monotone rules, including the Constrained Equal Award, the Propositional Rule, and many other well known rules. Moreover, all of the subgame perefect equilibria are coalition-proof in the associated game in strategic form.Journal of Economic LiteratureClassification Numbers: C72 and D63. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0899-8256 1090-2473 |
DOI: | 10.1006/game.1997.0526 |