Practicing prospection promotes patience: Repeated episodic future thinking cumulatively reduces delay discounting

•Impulsive discounting rates, an addiction marker, improve with episodic prospection.•Repeated episodic prospection cumulatively improved discounting rates in drinkers.•Another manipulation, hypothetical scarcity, did not show cumulative effects.•Episodic prospection targeting discounting shows tran...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Drug and alcohol dependence Vol. 204; p. 107507
Main Authors: Mellis, Alexandra M., Snider, Sarah E., Deshpande, Harshawardhan U., LaConte, Stephen M., Bickel, Warren K.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Lausanne Elsevier B.V 01-11-2019
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Impulsive discounting rates, an addiction marker, improve with episodic prospection.•Repeated episodic prospection cumulatively improved discounting rates in drinkers.•Another manipulation, hypothetical scarcity, did not show cumulative effects.•Episodic prospection targeting discounting shows translational potential. Delay discounting, or the preference for smaller, sooner over larger, later rewards, has been associated with alcohol use disorder and problem drinking. Episodic future thinking has been suggested as an intervention to address steep delay discounting. In the present study, we examined the effect of up to six consecutive sessions of episodic future thinking. Repeated, within-subject data were collected from current and recent problem drinkers (n = 50) over six sessions. Linear mixed-effect models were used to estimate effects of repeated sessions and manipulations. Participants completed episodic future thinking interviews at up to six sessions, in which they generated personalized future events. Participants also engaged with cues of scarcity. At each session, participants completed three delay discounting tasks under: a no-cue baseline condition, a future cue condition, and a scarcity cue condition. Delay discounting in the no cue condition did not change over time. Discounting rates were reduced in the future cue condition, and these effects grew larger with repeated sessions. In the scarcity condition, discounting rates were slightly higher, with no effect of repeated sessions. Episodic future thinking reduced delay discounting rate while future cues were presented, and these effects grew larger with repeated sessions. This suggests that repeated episodic future thinking may cumulatively potentiate repair of excessive preference for immediate reward.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
These two authors have contributed equally to the present work.
Contributors
AMM was contributed to manipulation design, data analysis, and manuscript preparation. SES contributed to experimental design, data collection, and manuscript preparation. HUD contributed to manuscript preparation. SML contributed to experimental design and manuscript preparation. WKB contributed to experimental design and manuscript preparation. All authors have approved of submission of this manuscript.
ISSN:0376-8716
1879-0046
DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.06.010