The Trade and Welfare Impacts of Australian Quarantine Policies: The Case of Pigmeat

We analyse the trade and welfare impact of quarantine measures imposed by Australia on imports of pigmeat. In particular, we account for changes to Australia’s pigmeat quarantine policy over time including those changes related to the recent resolution of a WTO dispute between Australia and the Euro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World economy Vol. 35; no. 8; pp. 1006 - 1021
Main Authors: Beghin, John, Melatos, Mark
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-08-2012
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We analyse the trade and welfare impact of quarantine measures imposed by Australia on imports of pigmeat. In particular, we account for changes to Australia’s pigmeat quarantine policy over time including those changes related to the recent resolution of a WTO dispute between Australia and the European Union. Using a random utility model, and applying it to corner solutions in import decisions, tariff equivalents (by major trading partner) are estimated for the different pigmeat quarantine regimes implemented by Australia during the period 1988–2009. The welfare impact on consumers, producers and foreign exporters is computed using a partial equilibrium model calibrated on the econometric estimates. The quarantine regimes had a strong effect on trade and welfare with a tariff equivalent above 113 per cent of average real‐world prices over the period analysed.
Bibliography:istex:114BC3AAAFA36644523C5D0D38D9E2DDC05A9E17
ark:/67375/WNG-8FC1VKWH-D
ArticleID:TWEC1459
The authors thank Chengyan Yue for help with R programming, guest editor, David Orden and an anonymous referee for comments and suggestions, and NTM‐IMPACT project participants for their discussions and comments on previous drafts and presentations. Beghin acknowledges support of the Marlin Cole Fund at Iowa State University.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0378-5920
1467-9701
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2012.01459.x