Effect of ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on pain during patient positioning for central nervous blockade in hip surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Background Most patients with hip fractures are elderly patients with comorbidities, and well-managed pain management is associated with positive postoperative outcomes. In recent years, new indications for regional anesthesia techniques have been defined, and they have found more place in clinical...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC anesthesiology Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 1 - 316
Main Authors: Aygun, Hakan, Tulgar, Serkan, Yigit, Yavuz, Tasdemir, Ayşe, Kurt, Cengizhan, Genc, Caner, Bilgin, Sezgin, Senoğlu, Nimet, Koksal, Ersin
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London BioMed Central Ltd 15-09-2023
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Background Most patients with hip fractures are elderly patients with comorbidities, and well-managed pain management is associated with positive postoperative outcomes. In recent years, new indications for regional anesthesia techniques have been defined, and they have found more place in clinical practice. Herein we investigate the effect of US-guided PENG block on positioning pain and compare that effect to intravenous opioid in patients undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia for hip fractures. Additionally, we sought to investigate the effect of PENG block on pain scores, opioid intake, time to first analgesic requirement, and quality of recovery within the first 24 h following surgery. Methods In this study, patients were divided into the PENG (n = 42) and control group (n = 42) one hour prior to surgery. A team who was blinded to the assigned groups, collected and evaluated all data such as spinal anesthesia positioning pain, postoperative pain, opioid requirement. Results Patients that underwent PENG had statistically significantly lower NRS scores after interventions, immediately before positioning, at positioning and at end of spinal anesthesia. Pain scores during positioning for spinal anesthesia were statistically significantly lower in the PENG group than in the control group (p < 0.001). Total morphine use over the first 24 h was extremely statistically significantly lower in the PENG group (p < 0.001). Conclusions Positive outcomes of PENG block in patient positioning pain before spinal anesthesia, postoperative pain scores, and morphine consumption are consistent with similar studies. High patient satisfaction in patients who underwent PENG block contributes to the literature. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04871061 Keywords: Hip fractures, Patient positioning, Regional anesthesia, Pain management, Quality of recovery, Orthopedic anesthesia
AbstractList Most patients with hip fractures are elderly patients with comorbidities, and well-managed pain management is associated with positive postoperative outcomes. In recent years, new indications for regional anesthesia techniques have been defined, and they have found more place in clinical practice. Herein we investigate the effect of US-guided PENG block on positioning pain and compare that effect to intravenous opioid in patients undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia for hip fractures. Additionally, we sought to investigate the effect of PENG block on pain scores, opioid intake, time to first analgesic requirement, and quality of recovery within the first 24 h following surgery. In this study, patients were divided into the PENG (n = 42) and control group (n = 42) one hour prior to surgery. A team who was blinded to the assigned groups, collected and evaluated all data such as spinal anesthesia positioning pain, postoperative pain, opioid requirement. Positive outcomes of PENG block in patient positioning pain before spinal anesthesia, postoperative pain scores, and morphine consumption are consistent with similar studies. High patient satisfaction in patients who underwent PENG block contributes to the literature.
Background Most patients with hip fractures are elderly patients with comorbidities, and well-managed pain management is associated with positive postoperative outcomes. In recent years, new indications for regional anesthesia techniques have been defined, and they have found more place in clinical practice. Herein we investigate the effect of US-guided PENG block on positioning pain and compare that effect to intravenous opioid in patients undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia for hip fractures. Additionally, we sought to investigate the effect of PENG block on pain scores, opioid intake, time to first analgesic requirement, and quality of recovery within the first 24 h following surgery. Methods In this study, patients were divided into the PENG (n = 42) and control group (n = 42) one hour prior to surgery. A team who was blinded to the assigned groups, collected and evaluated all data such as spinal anesthesia positioning pain, postoperative pain, opioid requirement. Results Patients that underwent PENG had statistically significantly lower NRS scores after interventions, immediately before positioning, at positioning and at end of spinal anesthesia. Pain scores during positioning for spinal anesthesia were statistically significantly lower in the PENG group than in the control group (p < 0.001). Total morphine use over the first 24 h was extremely statistically significantly lower in the PENG group (p < 0.001). Conclusions Positive outcomes of PENG block in patient positioning pain before spinal anesthesia, postoperative pain scores, and morphine consumption are consistent with similar studies. High patient satisfaction in patients who underwent PENG block contributes to the literature. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04871061 Keywords: Hip fractures, Patient positioning, Regional anesthesia, Pain management, Quality of recovery, Orthopedic anesthesia
Abstract Background Most patients with hip fractures are elderly patients with comorbidities, and well-managed pain management is associated with positive postoperative outcomes. In recent years, new indications for regional anesthesia techniques have been defined, and they have found more place in clinical practice. Herein we investigate the effect of US-guided PENG block on positioning pain and compare that effect to intravenous opioid in patients undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia for hip fractures. Additionally, we sought to investigate the effect of PENG block on pain scores, opioid intake, time to first analgesic requirement, and quality of recovery within the first 24 h following surgery. Methods In this study, patients were divided into the PENG (n = 42) and control group (n = 42) one hour prior to surgery. A team who was blinded to the assigned groups, collected and evaluated all data such as spinal anesthesia positioning pain, postoperative pain, opioid requirement. Results Patients that underwent PENG had statistically significantly lower NRS scores after interventions, immediately before positioning, at positioning and at end of spinal anesthesia. Pain scores during positioning for spinal anesthesia were statistically significantly lower in the PENG group than in the control group (p < 0.001). Total morphine use over the first 24 h was extremely statistically significantly lower in the PENG group (p < 0.001). Conclusions Positive outcomes of PENG block in patient positioning pain before spinal anesthesia, postoperative pain scores, and morphine consumption are consistent with similar studies. High patient satisfaction in patients who underwent PENG block contributes to the literature. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04871061
BackgroundMost patients with hip fractures are elderly patients with comorbidities, and well-managed pain management is associated with positive postoperative outcomes. In recent years, new indications for regional anesthesia techniques have been defined, and they have found more place in clinical practice. Herein we investigate the effect of US-guided PENG block on positioning pain and compare that effect to intravenous opioid in patients undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia for hip fractures. Additionally, we sought to investigate the effect of PENG block on pain scores, opioid intake, time to first analgesic requirement, and quality of recovery within the first 24 h following surgery.MethodsIn this study, patients were divided into the PENG (n = 42) and control group (n = 42) one hour prior to surgery. A team who was blinded to the assigned groups, collected and evaluated all data such as spinal anesthesia positioning pain, postoperative pain, opioid requirement.ResultsPatients that underwent PENG had statistically significantly lower NRS scores after interventions, immediately before positioning, at positioning and at end of spinal anesthesia. Pain scores during positioning for spinal anesthesia were statistically significantly lower in the PENG group than in the control group (p < 0.001). Total morphine use over the first 24 h was extremely statistically significantly lower in the PENG group (p < 0.001).ConclusionsPositive outcomes of PENG block in patient positioning pain before spinal anesthesia, postoperative pain scores, and morphine consumption are consistent with similar studies. High patient satisfaction in patients who underwent PENG block contributes to the literature.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04871061
BACKGROUNDMost patients with hip fractures are elderly patients with comorbidities, and well-managed pain management is associated with positive postoperative outcomes. In recent years, new indications for regional anesthesia techniques have been defined, and they have found more place in clinical practice. Herein we investigate the effect of US-guided PENG block on positioning pain and compare that effect to intravenous opioid in patients undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia for hip fractures. Additionally, we sought to investigate the effect of PENG block on pain scores, opioid intake, time to first analgesic requirement, and quality of recovery within the first 24 h following surgery.METHODSIn this study, patients were divided into the PENG (n = 42) and control group (n = 42) one hour prior to surgery. A team who was blinded to the assigned groups, collected and evaluated all data such as spinal anesthesia positioning pain, postoperative pain, opioid requirement.RESULTSPatients that underwent PENG had statistically significantly lower NRS scores after interventions, immediately before positioning, at positioning and at end of spinal anesthesia. Pain scores during positioning for spinal anesthesia were statistically significantly lower in the PENG group than in the control group (p < 0.001). Total morphine use over the first 24 h was extremely statistically significantly lower in the PENG group (p < 0.001).CONCLUSIONSPositive outcomes of PENG block in patient positioning pain before spinal anesthesia, postoperative pain scores, and morphine consumption are consistent with similar studies. High patient satisfaction in patients who underwent PENG block contributes to the literature.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04871061.
ArticleNumber 316
Audience Academic
Author Bilgin, Sezgin
Kurt, Cengizhan
Tulgar, Serkan
Tasdemir, Ayşe
Genc, Caner
Senoğlu, Nimet
Aygun, Hakan
Yigit, Yavuz
Koksal, Ersin
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Hakan
  surname: Aygun
  fullname: Aygun, Hakan
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Serkan
  surname: Tulgar
  fullname: Tulgar, Serkan
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Yavuz
  surname: Yigit
  fullname: Yigit, Yavuz
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Ayşe
  surname: Tasdemir
  fullname: Tasdemir, Ayşe
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Cengizhan
  surname: Kurt
  fullname: Kurt, Cengizhan
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Caner
  surname: Genc
  fullname: Genc, Caner
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Sezgin
  surname: Bilgin
  fullname: Bilgin, Sezgin
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Nimet
  surname: Senoğlu
  fullname: Senoğlu, Nimet
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Ersin
  surname: Koksal
  fullname: Koksal, Ersin
BookMark eNptUslu1TAUjVARHeAHWFliUxYpHmOHDaqqR6lUAQtYW45jp37k2cFOKpWf4he5bxBQhCzLV8fnHPsOp9VRTNFV1UuCLwhRzZtCqJKkxpTBplzU7El1QjhAlAp29Fd8XJ2WssaYSIXZs-qYSUkEkeyk-rny3tkZJY-Wcc6mpCX29bCE3vVocjlYM5VlNBlFl-8dGnJaJnT-efXx-jXqxmS_oRTRZEJE_ZJDHCCeg4szmlIJc0hxi_mUkQUwm3Hnk5ayF5veIZDehQmVJQ8uP7xFBmUT-7QJP-ALNoEqjSOEcw5mfF499WYs7sXhPKu-vl99ufpQ3366vrm6vK2t4GSuedsrSLZRbau8pT2Uh3DedkK2tnVCkI4ZTpmjovHMSUYbY7zi2HrOVesbdlbd7H37ZNZ6ymFj8oNOJugdkPKgTZ6DHZ1upfJUmQZ3RHLButb6pjNSKNq1sqMKvN7tvaal27j-UIhHpo9vYrjTQ7rXBAvMoNXgcH5wyOn74sqsN6FYN44mOqilpqoRUklOCVBf_UNdpyVHqNWOxVpMGPvDGgxkEKJP8LDdmupL2QiupCIYWBf_YcHq3SZAZ5wPgD8S0L3A5lRKdv53kgTr7czq_cxqmFm9m1nN2C8lf-AO
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_5313_wja_v13_i1_90514
crossref_primary_10_23736_S0375_9393_24_18028_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2024_04_016
Cites_doi 10.1186/s12877-021-02500-7
10.1136/rapm-2021-102982
10.2106/JBJS.16.01247
10.4103/ija.IJA_450_20
10.1213/ANE.0000000000006364
10.5371/hp.2023.35.2.63
10.1001/jama.2021.23761
10.1056/NEJMoa2113514
10.1097/EJA.0000000000001875
10.1080/11101849.2020.1828017
10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14798-9
10.1097/AAP.0000000000000133
10.1111/aas.13221
10.1111/anae.15042
10.1136/rapm-2021-103086
10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.109650
10.1111/anae.15498
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.
2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
3V.
7TK
7X7
7XB
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
COVID
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
M1P
PIMPY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12871-023-02245-3
DatabaseName CrossRef
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Neurosciences Abstracts
Health Medical collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
Coronavirus Research Database
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
PML(ProQuest Medical Library)
Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Coronavirus Research Database
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Neurosciences Abstracts
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
Health Research Premium Collection
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList


Publicly Available Content Database
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: http://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1471-2253
EndPage 316
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_978f28a60b17453b9cf6ba7582b97b28
A765487810
10_1186_s12871_023_02245_3
GeographicLocations United States--US
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States--US
GroupedDBID ---
-A0
0R~
23N
2WC
3V.
53G
5GY
5VS
6J9
6PF
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACPRK
ACRMQ
ADBBV
ADINQ
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFRAH
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C24
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
P2P
PGMZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
TR2
TUS
U2A
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
~8M
7TK
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
COVID
DWQXO
K9.
PQEST
PQUKI
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-49d817868998fc2d2241449b579c9e551b3a423e256f3e7326aaf840cf4489f63
IEDL.DBID RPM
ISSN 1471-2253
IngestDate Tue Oct 22 15:10:50 EDT 2024
Tue Sep 17 21:29:36 EDT 2024
Fri Oct 25 04:03:02 EDT 2024
Thu Oct 10 14:43:09 EDT 2024
Tue Nov 19 21:49:06 EST 2024
Wed Nov 13 00:01:22 EST 2024
Fri Nov 22 01:17:23 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c541t-49d817868998fc2d2241449b579c9e551b3a423e256f3e7326aaf840cf4489f63
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
OpenAccessLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503118/
PMID 37715173
PQID 2865390133
PQPubID 44060
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_978f28a60b17453b9cf6ba7582b97b28
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10503118
proquest_miscellaneous_2865787421
proquest_journals_2865390133
gale_infotracmisc_A765487810
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A765487810
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12871_023_02245_3
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-09-15
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-09-15
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-09-15
  day: 15
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
PublicationTitle BMC anesthesiology
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References AK Alrefaey (2245_CR13) 2020; 36
DG Ju (2245_CR1) 2017; 99
M Anger (2245_CR9) 2021; 76
L Morgan (2245_CR3) 2020; 75
MD Neuman (2245_CR4) 2021; 385
2245_CR10
E Kim (2245_CR11) 2023; 35
G Pascarella (2245_CR8) 2022; 47
2245_CR7
M Diakomi (2245_CR14) 2014; 39
F Moosa (2245_CR18) 2022; 47
2245_CR17
TD Nielsen (2245_CR19) 2019; 63
RK Sahoo (2245_CR12) 2020; 64
2245_CR15
L Girón-Arango (2245_CR6) 2018; 43
M Ruel (2245_CR5) 2021; 21
K Okike (2245_CR2) 2022; 327
JY Kim (2245_CR16) 2023; 136
References_xml – ident: 2245_CR17
– volume: 21
  start-page: 575
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: 2245_CR5
  publication-title: BMC Geriatr
  doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02500-7
  contributor:
    fullname: M Ruel
– volume: 47
  start-page: 146
  issue: 2
  year: 2022
  ident: 2245_CR18
  publication-title: Reg Anesth Pain Med
  doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102982
  contributor:
    fullname: F Moosa
– volume: 43
  start-page: 859
  issue: 8
  year: 2018
  ident: 2245_CR6
  publication-title: Reg Anesth Pain Med
  contributor:
    fullname: L Girón-Arango
– volume: 99
  start-page: 1932
  issue: 22
  year: 2017
  ident: 2245_CR1
  publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am
  doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01247
  contributor:
    fullname: DG Ju
– volume: 64
  start-page: 898
  issue: 10
  year: 2020
  ident: 2245_CR12
  publication-title: Indian J Anaesth
  doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_450_20
  contributor:
    fullname: RK Sahoo
– volume: 136
  start-page: 597
  issue: 3
  year: 2023
  ident: 2245_CR16
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
  doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006364
  contributor:
    fullname: JY Kim
– volume: 35
  start-page: 63
  issue: 2
  year: 2023
  ident: 2245_CR11
  publication-title: Hip Pelvis
  doi: 10.5371/hp.2023.35.2.63
  contributor:
    fullname: E Kim
– volume: 327
  start-page: 387
  issue: 4
  year: 2022
  ident: 2245_CR2
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.23761
  contributor:
    fullname: K Okike
– volume: 385
  start-page: 2025
  issue: 22
  year: 2021
  ident: 2245_CR4
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2113514
  contributor:
    fullname: MD Neuman
– ident: 2245_CR10
  doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001875
– volume: 36
  start-page: 234
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  ident: 2245_CR13
  publication-title: Egypt J Anaesth
  doi: 10.1080/11101849.2020.1828017
  contributor:
    fullname: AK Alrefaey
– ident: 2245_CR7
  doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14798-9
– volume: 39
  start-page: 394
  issue: 5
  year: 2014
  ident: 2245_CR14
  publication-title: Reg Anesth Pain Med
  doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000133
  contributor:
    fullname: M Diakomi
– volume: 63
  start-page: 101
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 2245_CR19
  publication-title: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
  doi: 10.1111/aas.13221
  contributor:
    fullname: TD Nielsen
– volume: 75
  start-page: 1173
  issue: 9
  year: 2020
  ident: 2245_CR3
  publication-title: Anaesthesia
  doi: 10.1111/anae.15042
  contributor:
    fullname: L Morgan
– volume: 47
  start-page: 200
  issue: 3
  year: 2022
  ident: 2245_CR8
  publication-title: Reg Anesth Pain Med
  doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-103086
  contributor:
    fullname: G Pascarella
– ident: 2245_CR15
  doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.109650
– volume: 76
  start-page: 1082
  issue: 8
  year: 2021
  ident: 2245_CR9
  publication-title: Anaesthesia
  doi: 10.1111/anae.15498
  contributor:
    fullname: M Anger
SSID ssj0017803
Score 2.362081
Snippet Background Most patients with hip fractures are elderly patients with comorbidities, and well-managed pain management is associated with positive postoperative...
Most patients with hip fractures are elderly patients with comorbidities, and well-managed pain management is associated with positive postoperative outcomes....
BackgroundMost patients with hip fractures are elderly patients with comorbidities, and well-managed pain management is associated with positive postoperative...
BACKGROUNDMost patients with hip fractures are elderly patients with comorbidities, and well-managed pain management is associated with positive postoperative...
Abstract Background Most patients with hip fractures are elderly patients with comorbidities, and well-managed pain management is associated with positive...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
StartPage 1
SubjectTerms Analgesics
Anesthesia
Care and treatment
Chronic pain
Comorbidity
Fentanyl
Fractures
Hip
Hip fractures
Hip joint
Intervention
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Morphine
Mortality
Narcotics
Opioids
Orthopedic anesthesia
Pain
Pain management
Patient positioning
Patient satisfaction
Patients
Quality of recovery
Regional anesthesia
Surgery
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3Ni9UwEA-6Jy-iqPh0XUYQVCTYjzRtvK361j0tggreQpoPt7jbPuz24j_lv7gzSfuwevDirTRJmc5HZyad-YWxZ3nhWoIZ4xgLSC6Et7wJoeaiMEIZvJRxM-f0U332tXm_JZic_VFfVBOW4IET4wgBNhSNkVmLsXNVtsoG2RqMcotW1W2R2nwzuSRT8_-DusnKpUWmka_HnBIDjv6Jk8-qeLlyQxGt_-9v8p91kr85npM77PYcMcJxovQuu-H7e-xXQh2GIcB0gatGOh2Jf5s65x3s4k8YTH8xa4WeShohNm_Ai4_bsw8voUUH9h2GHnam6yE1KsIMsApLFRfdw4AWZqric4ZpTIuN84BLz7sdjKmv-g0YQLfnhsvuJ5IwV8Bf4GU8F-Q--3Ky_fzulM9nL3BbifyKC-Ua5KKkdCzYwpGnF0K1Va2s8hhmtaXBSMxjxBRKX2MQaEzAZNEGzPdUkOUDdtAPvX_IIFQWH2WMqVEnChSZU7JGzZEuzywGfBv2ahGF3iWIDR1Tk0bqJDiNgtNRcLrcsLckrf1MgseON1Bp9Kw0-l9Ks2HPSdaajBh5aM3ci4AEExyWPq4lZXJNnm3Y4WomGp9dDy_aomfjHzU1-9JWUonEPt0P00oqaOs9CivOwW-lKPD1m5WWrd5sPdJ35xEAPCcQH-TPo__Bi8fsVhENQ_G8OmQHVz8m_4TdHN10FG3qGslTJ3I
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Effect of ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on pain during patient positioning for central nervous blockade in hip surgery: a randomized controlled trial
URI https://www.proquest.com/docview/2865390133
https://search.proquest.com/docview/2865787421
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10503118
https://doaj.org/article/978f28a60b17453b9cf6ba7582b97b28
Volume 23
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELbYnrggECAWyspISICQu5uXH9xK2VKEqCoBEjfLduw26m4SNd1L_1T_IjNOUhG4cYtiTzTJzHjmc2bGhLxO0tJimzEGsQBnee4dkyEIlqcmVwYuedzMOfkuTn_JT2tsk8PHWpiYtO9sdVBvtgd1dRFzK9utW455Ysuzb0cJNjGByHg5IzMIDkeMPvw7EHKVjeUxki-7BEEBA9_E0F8VDI_OyYQAVyeyiTeKTfv_XZr_Tpf8w_8cPyQPhsCRHvYMPiL3fP2Y3PbNh2kT6G4DVB0eksTOd1XpS9rGfzGAggG80hozG2ms4aBvz9ann99RC37skjY1bU1V075ekQ59VumYzIX3IK6lA1fxOc2u64lN6SmQXlQt7fry6g_UUPB-ZbOtboCFIRF-A5fxeJAn5Ofx-sfRCRuOYGCuyJNrlqtSwgfliMqCS0t0-HmubCGUUx6iLZsZCMg8BE4h8wJiQWMCYEYXAPapwLOnZK9uav-M0FA4eJQxRoBqpDaVpeICFIiXycpB3Dcn70dR6LbvtKEjQpFc9zLUIEMdZaizOfmI0rqbiV2y443m6lwPuqIBIYdUGr6ygLuKzCoXuDWAkFKrBHAwJ29Q1hptGb6hM0NJAjCMXbH0oeAI6GSympP9yUywQTcdHrVFD2tAp7HmF3eUMmD21d0wUmJeW-1BWHEOLJl5Cq8vJ1o2ebPpCJhF7AM-msHz_yd9Qe6n0TIUS4p9snd9tfMvyawrdwvAF1--LuIexSIa2G_LYSqm
link.rule.ids 230,315,729,782,786,866,887,2106,27933,27934,53801,53803
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
linkToHtml http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Nb9QwELVoOcCFggCxbQEjIQFC7ubTjrmVsmUR7aoSReJmOXbcRuwmUdNc-FP8RWacpCJw6y2K7ex4Z-x5L5kZE_I6jGyOZcYYYAHOkqQwLHNOsCTSidRwyf3LnOU3sfqRfVpgmRw-5sL4oH2TlwfVenNQlZc-trLZmPkYJzY_Oz0KsYgJIOP5FrkLCzYIR5Y-fD0QWRCPCTIZn7ch0gIG3omhx0oZHp4TCwHOTsQTf-TL9v-_Of8bMPmXBzreua3sD8mDAXPSw779EblTVI_J775uMa0d7dbwcy2er8QuutIWljb-Mw4QaOC9tMKgSOrTP-jbs8Xq8zuagwv8SeuKNrqsaJ_qSIcSrXSMA8N7AInpMB3_nLpr-8HaFhSGXpYNbfvM7A9UU3Cctt6Uv0CEIYZ-DZf-ZJEn5Pvx4vxoyYbTG5hJk_CaJdJmoAmOhM6ZyCJWSBKZp0IaWQBQy2MNWK4AzOXiQgCM1NoB3TQOGKN0PH5Ktqu6Kp4R6lIDj9JaC7CqKI8yK7kA2-M2DAxAxhl5P-pQNX2RDuXJTcZVr3wFylde-SqekY-o5pueWGDb36ivLtSgKgXk2kWZ5kEOlC2Nc2kczzWQqyiXAiSYkTdoJAq3AfgPjR6yGUBgLKilDgVHLpiFwYzsT3rC8jXT5tHM1LB9tArThfFlVAzCvrppxpEYElcVoCzfB3bbJILpZxPznMxs2gJW6UuIj1a4e_uhL8m95fnpiTr5svq6R-5HfnlJFqb7ZPv6qiuek63Wdi_8yvwDcJk-ZQ
linkToPdf http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELZokRAXCgLEQgEjIQFCbjYvO-mttLsUAauVAImb5UfcRuwmUdNc-FP9i8w4SUXgBrfIj2Qcjz3fl8yMCXkZRlZjmjEGWICzJCkMy5wTLIlUkiu45P5jzukXsfqenSwwTc7hGAvjnfaNLg-qzfagKs-9b2WzNcHoJxasPx-HmMQEkHHQWBfskJuwaOfxyNSHPwgCisYgmYwHbYjUgIGFYmi1UoYH6MRCgMET8cQm-dT9f2_QfzpN_maFlnv_I_9dcmfAnvSob3OP3Ciq--Sqz19Ma0e7DTyyxXOW2FlX2sLSxv_OASIN_JdW6BxJfRgIfb1erN6_oRpM4Q9aV7RRZUX7kEc6pGqloz8YlgE0psOQ_H3qru07K1tQ6HpeNrTtI7QPqaJgQG29LX-CCIMv_QYu_QkjD8i35eLr8SkbTnFgJk3CS5bkNoPZ4EjsnIksYoYkyXUqcpMXANh0rADTFYC9XFwIgJNKOaCdxgFzzB2PH5Ldqq6KR4S61MCtlFICtCvSUWZzLkAHuQ3nBqDjjLwd51E2fbIO6UlOxmWvABIUQHoFkPGMvMOpvm6JibZ9QX1xJofpkkCyXZQpPtdA3dJY58ZxrYBkRToXIMGMvEJFkbgdwDs0aohqAIExsZY8Ehw5YRbOZ2R_0hKWsZlWj6omh22klRg2jB-lYhD2xXU19kTXuKqAyfJtYNdNIhh-NlHRycimNaCZPpX4qImP_73rc3JrfbKUnz6sPj4htyO_wnIWpvtk9_KiK56SndZ2z_zi_AVRcEDl
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect+of+ultrasound-guided+pericapsular+nerve+group+%28PENG%29+block+on+pain+during+patient+positioning+for+central+nervous+blockade+in+hip+surgery%3A+a+randomized+controlled+trial&rft.jtitle=BMC+anesthesiology&rft.au=Aygun%2C+Hakan&rft.au=Tulgar%2C+Serkan&rft.au=Yigit%2C+Yavuz&rft.au=Tasdemir%2C+Ay%C5%9Fe&rft.date=2023-09-15&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1471-2253&rft.volume=23&rft.spage=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12871-023-02245-3
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2253&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2253&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2253&client=summon