Effect of ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on pain during patient positioning for central nervous blockade in hip surgery: a randomized controlled trial
Background Most patients with hip fractures are elderly patients with comorbidities, and well-managed pain management is associated with positive postoperative outcomes. In recent years, new indications for regional anesthesia techniques have been defined, and they have found more place in clinical...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC anesthesiology Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 1 - 316 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
London
BioMed Central Ltd
15-09-2023
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | Background Most patients with hip fractures are elderly patients with comorbidities, and well-managed pain management is associated with positive postoperative outcomes. In recent years, new indications for regional anesthesia techniques have been defined, and they have found more place in clinical practice. Herein we investigate the effect of US-guided PENG block on positioning pain and compare that effect to intravenous opioid in patients undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia for hip fractures. Additionally, we sought to investigate the effect of PENG block on pain scores, opioid intake, time to first analgesic requirement, and quality of recovery within the first 24 h following surgery. Methods In this study, patients were divided into the PENG (n = 42) and control group (n = 42) one hour prior to surgery. A team who was blinded to the assigned groups, collected and evaluated all data such as spinal anesthesia positioning pain, postoperative pain, opioid requirement. Results Patients that underwent PENG had statistically significantly lower NRS scores after interventions, immediately before positioning, at positioning and at end of spinal anesthesia. Pain scores during positioning for spinal anesthesia were statistically significantly lower in the PENG group than in the control group (p < 0.001). Total morphine use over the first 24 h was extremely statistically significantly lower in the PENG group (p < 0.001). Conclusions Positive outcomes of PENG block in patient positioning pain before spinal anesthesia, postoperative pain scores, and morphine consumption are consistent with similar studies. High patient satisfaction in patients who underwent PENG block contributes to the literature. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04871061 Keywords: Hip fractures, Patient positioning, Regional anesthesia, Pain management, Quality of recovery, Orthopedic anesthesia |
---|---|
AbstractList | Most patients with hip fractures are elderly patients with comorbidities, and well-managed pain management is associated with positive postoperative outcomes. In recent years, new indications for regional anesthesia techniques have been defined, and they have found more place in clinical practice. Herein we investigate the effect of US-guided PENG block on positioning pain and compare that effect to intravenous opioid in patients undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia for hip fractures. Additionally, we sought to investigate the effect of PENG block on pain scores, opioid intake, time to first analgesic requirement, and quality of recovery within the first 24 h following surgery. In this study, patients were divided into the PENG (n = 42) and control group (n = 42) one hour prior to surgery. A team who was blinded to the assigned groups, collected and evaluated all data such as spinal anesthesia positioning pain, postoperative pain, opioid requirement. Positive outcomes of PENG block in patient positioning pain before spinal anesthesia, postoperative pain scores, and morphine consumption are consistent with similar studies. High patient satisfaction in patients who underwent PENG block contributes to the literature. Background Most patients with hip fractures are elderly patients with comorbidities, and well-managed pain management is associated with positive postoperative outcomes. In recent years, new indications for regional anesthesia techniques have been defined, and they have found more place in clinical practice. Herein we investigate the effect of US-guided PENG block on positioning pain and compare that effect to intravenous opioid in patients undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia for hip fractures. Additionally, we sought to investigate the effect of PENG block on pain scores, opioid intake, time to first analgesic requirement, and quality of recovery within the first 24 h following surgery. Methods In this study, patients were divided into the PENG (n = 42) and control group (n = 42) one hour prior to surgery. A team who was blinded to the assigned groups, collected and evaluated all data such as spinal anesthesia positioning pain, postoperative pain, opioid requirement. Results Patients that underwent PENG had statistically significantly lower NRS scores after interventions, immediately before positioning, at positioning and at end of spinal anesthesia. Pain scores during positioning for spinal anesthesia were statistically significantly lower in the PENG group than in the control group (p < 0.001). Total morphine use over the first 24 h was extremely statistically significantly lower in the PENG group (p < 0.001). Conclusions Positive outcomes of PENG block in patient positioning pain before spinal anesthesia, postoperative pain scores, and morphine consumption are consistent with similar studies. High patient satisfaction in patients who underwent PENG block contributes to the literature. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04871061 Keywords: Hip fractures, Patient positioning, Regional anesthesia, Pain management, Quality of recovery, Orthopedic anesthesia Abstract Background Most patients with hip fractures are elderly patients with comorbidities, and well-managed pain management is associated with positive postoperative outcomes. In recent years, new indications for regional anesthesia techniques have been defined, and they have found more place in clinical practice. Herein we investigate the effect of US-guided PENG block on positioning pain and compare that effect to intravenous opioid in patients undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia for hip fractures. Additionally, we sought to investigate the effect of PENG block on pain scores, opioid intake, time to first analgesic requirement, and quality of recovery within the first 24 h following surgery. Methods In this study, patients were divided into the PENG (n = 42) and control group (n = 42) one hour prior to surgery. A team who was blinded to the assigned groups, collected and evaluated all data such as spinal anesthesia positioning pain, postoperative pain, opioid requirement. Results Patients that underwent PENG had statistically significantly lower NRS scores after interventions, immediately before positioning, at positioning and at end of spinal anesthesia. Pain scores during positioning for spinal anesthesia were statistically significantly lower in the PENG group than in the control group (p < 0.001). Total morphine use over the first 24 h was extremely statistically significantly lower in the PENG group (p < 0.001). Conclusions Positive outcomes of PENG block in patient positioning pain before spinal anesthesia, postoperative pain scores, and morphine consumption are consistent with similar studies. High patient satisfaction in patients who underwent PENG block contributes to the literature. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04871061 BackgroundMost patients with hip fractures are elderly patients with comorbidities, and well-managed pain management is associated with positive postoperative outcomes. In recent years, new indications for regional anesthesia techniques have been defined, and they have found more place in clinical practice. Herein we investigate the effect of US-guided PENG block on positioning pain and compare that effect to intravenous opioid in patients undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia for hip fractures. Additionally, we sought to investigate the effect of PENG block on pain scores, opioid intake, time to first analgesic requirement, and quality of recovery within the first 24 h following surgery.MethodsIn this study, patients were divided into the PENG (n = 42) and control group (n = 42) one hour prior to surgery. A team who was blinded to the assigned groups, collected and evaluated all data such as spinal anesthesia positioning pain, postoperative pain, opioid requirement.ResultsPatients that underwent PENG had statistically significantly lower NRS scores after interventions, immediately before positioning, at positioning and at end of spinal anesthesia. Pain scores during positioning for spinal anesthesia were statistically significantly lower in the PENG group than in the control group (p < 0.001). Total morphine use over the first 24 h was extremely statistically significantly lower in the PENG group (p < 0.001).ConclusionsPositive outcomes of PENG block in patient positioning pain before spinal anesthesia, postoperative pain scores, and morphine consumption are consistent with similar studies. High patient satisfaction in patients who underwent PENG block contributes to the literature.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04871061 BACKGROUNDMost patients with hip fractures are elderly patients with comorbidities, and well-managed pain management is associated with positive postoperative outcomes. In recent years, new indications for regional anesthesia techniques have been defined, and they have found more place in clinical practice. Herein we investigate the effect of US-guided PENG block on positioning pain and compare that effect to intravenous opioid in patients undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia for hip fractures. Additionally, we sought to investigate the effect of PENG block on pain scores, opioid intake, time to first analgesic requirement, and quality of recovery within the first 24 h following surgery.METHODSIn this study, patients were divided into the PENG (n = 42) and control group (n = 42) one hour prior to surgery. A team who was blinded to the assigned groups, collected and evaluated all data such as spinal anesthesia positioning pain, postoperative pain, opioid requirement.RESULTSPatients that underwent PENG had statistically significantly lower NRS scores after interventions, immediately before positioning, at positioning and at end of spinal anesthesia. Pain scores during positioning for spinal anesthesia were statistically significantly lower in the PENG group than in the control group (p < 0.001). Total morphine use over the first 24 h was extremely statistically significantly lower in the PENG group (p < 0.001).CONCLUSIONSPositive outcomes of PENG block in patient positioning pain before spinal anesthesia, postoperative pain scores, and morphine consumption are consistent with similar studies. High patient satisfaction in patients who underwent PENG block contributes to the literature.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04871061. |
ArticleNumber | 316 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Bilgin, Sezgin Kurt, Cengizhan Tulgar, Serkan Tasdemir, Ayşe Genc, Caner Senoğlu, Nimet Aygun, Hakan Yigit, Yavuz Koksal, Ersin |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Hakan surname: Aygun fullname: Aygun, Hakan – sequence: 2 givenname: Serkan surname: Tulgar fullname: Tulgar, Serkan – sequence: 3 givenname: Yavuz surname: Yigit fullname: Yigit, Yavuz – sequence: 4 givenname: Ayşe surname: Tasdemir fullname: Tasdemir, Ayşe – sequence: 5 givenname: Cengizhan surname: Kurt fullname: Kurt, Cengizhan – sequence: 6 givenname: Caner surname: Genc fullname: Genc, Caner – sequence: 7 givenname: Sezgin surname: Bilgin fullname: Bilgin, Sezgin – sequence: 8 givenname: Nimet surname: Senoğlu fullname: Senoğlu, Nimet – sequence: 9 givenname: Ersin surname: Koksal fullname: Koksal, Ersin |
BookMark | eNptUslu1TAUjVARHeAHWFliUxYpHmOHDaqqR6lUAQtYW45jp37k2cFOKpWf4he5bxBQhCzLV8fnHPsOp9VRTNFV1UuCLwhRzZtCqJKkxpTBplzU7El1QjhAlAp29Fd8XJ2WssaYSIXZs-qYSUkEkeyk-rny3tkZJY-Wcc6mpCX29bCE3vVocjlYM5VlNBlFl-8dGnJaJnT-efXx-jXqxmS_oRTRZEJE_ZJDHCCeg4szmlIJc0hxi_mUkQUwm3Hnk5ayF5veIZDehQmVJQ8uP7xFBmUT-7QJP-ALNoEqjSOEcw5mfF499WYs7sXhPKu-vl99ufpQ3366vrm6vK2t4GSuedsrSLZRbau8pT2Uh3DedkK2tnVCkI4ZTpmjovHMSUYbY7zi2HrOVesbdlbd7H37ZNZ6ymFj8oNOJugdkPKgTZ6DHZ1upfJUmQZ3RHLButb6pjNSKNq1sqMKvN7tvaal27j-UIhHpo9vYrjTQ7rXBAvMoNXgcH5wyOn74sqsN6FYN44mOqilpqoRUklOCVBf_UNdpyVHqNWOxVpMGPvDGgxkEKJP8LDdmupL2QiupCIYWBf_YcHq3SZAZ5wPgD8S0L3A5lRKdv53kgTr7czq_cxqmFm9m1nN2C8lf-AO |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_5313_wja_v13_i1_90514 crossref_primary_10_23736_S0375_9393_24_18028_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2024_04_016 |
Cites_doi | 10.1186/s12877-021-02500-7 10.1136/rapm-2021-102982 10.2106/JBJS.16.01247 10.4103/ija.IJA_450_20 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006364 10.5371/hp.2023.35.2.63 10.1001/jama.2021.23761 10.1056/NEJMoa2113514 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001875 10.1080/11101849.2020.1828017 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14798-9 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000133 10.1111/aas.13221 10.1111/anae.15042 10.1136/rapm-2021-103086 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.109650 10.1111/anae.15498 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd. 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7TK 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU COVID DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M1P PIMPY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s12871-023-02245-3 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Neurosciences Abstracts Health Medical collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College Coronavirus Research Database ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) PML(ProQuest Medical Library) Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Coronavirus Research Database ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Neurosciences Abstracts ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: Directory of Open Access Journals url: http://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1471-2253 |
EndPage | 316 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_978f28a60b17453b9cf6ba7582b97b28 A765487810 10_1186_s12871_023_02245_3 |
GeographicLocations | United States--US |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States--US |
GroupedDBID | --- -A0 0R~ 23N 2WC 3V. 53G 5GY 5VS 6J9 6PF 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AAWTL AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACPRK ACRMQ ADBBV ADINQ ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C24 C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK E3Z EBD EBLON EBS ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH INR ITC KQ8 M1P M48 M~E O5R O5S OK1 P2P PGMZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ TR2 TUS U2A UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB ~8M 7TK 7XB 8FK AZQEC COVID DWQXO K9. PQEST PQUKI 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-49d817868998fc2d2241449b579c9e551b3a423e256f3e7326aaf840cf4489f63 |
IEDL.DBID | RPM |
ISSN | 1471-2253 |
IngestDate | Tue Oct 22 15:10:50 EDT 2024 Tue Sep 17 21:29:36 EDT 2024 Fri Oct 25 04:03:02 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 14:43:09 EDT 2024 Tue Nov 19 21:49:06 EST 2024 Wed Nov 13 00:01:22 EST 2024 Fri Nov 22 01:17:23 EST 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
License | Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c541t-49d817868998fc2d2241449b579c9e551b3a423e256f3e7326aaf840cf4489f63 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503118/ |
PMID | 37715173 |
PQID | 2865390133 |
PQPubID | 44060 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_978f28a60b17453b9cf6ba7582b97b28 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10503118 proquest_miscellaneous_2865787421 proquest_journals_2865390133 gale_infotracmisc_A765487810 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A765487810 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12871_023_02245_3 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2023-09-15 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-09-15 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2023 text: 2023-09-15 day: 15 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | London |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London |
PublicationTitle | BMC anesthesiology |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | AK Alrefaey (2245_CR13) 2020; 36 DG Ju (2245_CR1) 2017; 99 M Anger (2245_CR9) 2021; 76 L Morgan (2245_CR3) 2020; 75 MD Neuman (2245_CR4) 2021; 385 2245_CR10 E Kim (2245_CR11) 2023; 35 G Pascarella (2245_CR8) 2022; 47 2245_CR7 M Diakomi (2245_CR14) 2014; 39 F Moosa (2245_CR18) 2022; 47 2245_CR17 TD Nielsen (2245_CR19) 2019; 63 RK Sahoo (2245_CR12) 2020; 64 2245_CR15 L Girón-Arango (2245_CR6) 2018; 43 M Ruel (2245_CR5) 2021; 21 K Okike (2245_CR2) 2022; 327 JY Kim (2245_CR16) 2023; 136 |
References_xml | – ident: 2245_CR17 – volume: 21 start-page: 575 issue: 1 year: 2021 ident: 2245_CR5 publication-title: BMC Geriatr doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02500-7 contributor: fullname: M Ruel – volume: 47 start-page: 146 issue: 2 year: 2022 ident: 2245_CR18 publication-title: Reg Anesth Pain Med doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102982 contributor: fullname: F Moosa – volume: 43 start-page: 859 issue: 8 year: 2018 ident: 2245_CR6 publication-title: Reg Anesth Pain Med contributor: fullname: L Girón-Arango – volume: 99 start-page: 1932 issue: 22 year: 2017 ident: 2245_CR1 publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Am doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01247 contributor: fullname: DG Ju – volume: 64 start-page: 898 issue: 10 year: 2020 ident: 2245_CR12 publication-title: Indian J Anaesth doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_450_20 contributor: fullname: RK Sahoo – volume: 136 start-page: 597 issue: 3 year: 2023 ident: 2245_CR16 publication-title: Anesth Analg doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006364 contributor: fullname: JY Kim – volume: 35 start-page: 63 issue: 2 year: 2023 ident: 2245_CR11 publication-title: Hip Pelvis doi: 10.5371/hp.2023.35.2.63 contributor: fullname: E Kim – volume: 327 start-page: 387 issue: 4 year: 2022 ident: 2245_CR2 publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.23761 contributor: fullname: K Okike – volume: 385 start-page: 2025 issue: 22 year: 2021 ident: 2245_CR4 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2113514 contributor: fullname: MD Neuman – ident: 2245_CR10 doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001875 – volume: 36 start-page: 234 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 2245_CR13 publication-title: Egypt J Anaesth doi: 10.1080/11101849.2020.1828017 contributor: fullname: AK Alrefaey – ident: 2245_CR7 doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14798-9 – volume: 39 start-page: 394 issue: 5 year: 2014 ident: 2245_CR14 publication-title: Reg Anesth Pain Med doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000133 contributor: fullname: M Diakomi – volume: 63 start-page: 101 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 2245_CR19 publication-title: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand doi: 10.1111/aas.13221 contributor: fullname: TD Nielsen – volume: 75 start-page: 1173 issue: 9 year: 2020 ident: 2245_CR3 publication-title: Anaesthesia doi: 10.1111/anae.15042 contributor: fullname: L Morgan – volume: 47 start-page: 200 issue: 3 year: 2022 ident: 2245_CR8 publication-title: Reg Anesth Pain Med doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-103086 contributor: fullname: G Pascarella – ident: 2245_CR15 doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.109650 – volume: 76 start-page: 1082 issue: 8 year: 2021 ident: 2245_CR9 publication-title: Anaesthesia doi: 10.1111/anae.15498 contributor: fullname: M Anger |
SSID | ssj0017803 |
Score | 2.362081 |
Snippet | Background Most patients with hip fractures are elderly patients with comorbidities, and well-managed pain management is associated with positive postoperative... Most patients with hip fractures are elderly patients with comorbidities, and well-managed pain management is associated with positive postoperative outcomes.... BackgroundMost patients with hip fractures are elderly patients with comorbidities, and well-managed pain management is associated with positive postoperative... BACKGROUNDMost patients with hip fractures are elderly patients with comorbidities, and well-managed pain management is associated with positive postoperative... Abstract Background Most patients with hip fractures are elderly patients with comorbidities, and well-managed pain management is associated with positive... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database |
StartPage | 1 |
SubjectTerms | Analgesics Anesthesia Care and treatment Chronic pain Comorbidity Fentanyl Fractures Hip Hip fractures Hip joint Intervention Medical research Medicine, Experimental Morphine Mortality Narcotics Opioids Orthopedic anesthesia Pain Pain management Patient positioning Patient satisfaction Patients Quality of recovery Regional anesthesia Surgery |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3Ni9UwEA-6Jy-iqPh0XUYQVCTYjzRtvK361j0tggreQpoPt7jbPuz24j_lv7gzSfuwevDirTRJmc5HZyad-YWxZ3nhWoIZ4xgLSC6Et7wJoeaiMEIZvJRxM-f0U332tXm_JZic_VFfVBOW4IET4wgBNhSNkVmLsXNVtsoG2RqMcotW1W2R2nwzuSRT8_-DusnKpUWmka_HnBIDjv6Jk8-qeLlyQxGt_-9v8p91kr85npM77PYcMcJxovQuu-H7e-xXQh2GIcB0gatGOh2Jf5s65x3s4k8YTH8xa4WeShohNm_Ai4_bsw8voUUH9h2GHnam6yE1KsIMsApLFRfdw4AWZqric4ZpTIuN84BLz7sdjKmv-g0YQLfnhsvuJ5IwV8Bf4GU8F-Q--3Ky_fzulM9nL3BbifyKC-Ua5KKkdCzYwpGnF0K1Va2s8hhmtaXBSMxjxBRKX2MQaEzAZNEGzPdUkOUDdtAPvX_IIFQWH2WMqVEnChSZU7JGzZEuzywGfBv2ahGF3iWIDR1Tk0bqJDiNgtNRcLrcsLckrf1MgseON1Bp9Kw0-l9Ks2HPSdaajBh5aM3ci4AEExyWPq4lZXJNnm3Y4WomGp9dDy_aomfjHzU1-9JWUonEPt0P00oqaOs9CivOwW-lKPD1m5WWrd5sPdJ35xEAPCcQH-TPo__Bi8fsVhENQ_G8OmQHVz8m_4TdHN10FG3qGslTJ3I priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
Title | Effect of ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on pain during patient positioning for central nervous blockade in hip surgery: a randomized controlled trial |
URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2865390133 https://search.proquest.com/docview/2865787421 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10503118 https://doaj.org/article/978f28a60b17453b9cf6ba7582b97b28 |
Volume | 23 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELbYnrggECAWyspISICQu5uXH9xK2VKEqCoBEjfLduw26m4SNd1L_1T_IjNOUhG4cYtiTzTJzHjmc2bGhLxO0tJimzEGsQBnee4dkyEIlqcmVwYuedzMOfkuTn_JT2tsk8PHWpiYtO9sdVBvtgd1dRFzK9utW455Ysuzb0cJNjGByHg5IzMIDkeMPvw7EHKVjeUxki-7BEEBA9_E0F8VDI_OyYQAVyeyiTeKTfv_XZr_Tpf8w_8cPyQPhsCRHvYMPiL3fP2Y3PbNh2kT6G4DVB0eksTOd1XpS9rGfzGAggG80hozG2ms4aBvz9ann99RC37skjY1bU1V075ekQ59VumYzIX3IK6lA1fxOc2u64lN6SmQXlQt7fry6g_UUPB-ZbOtboCFIRF-A5fxeJAn5Ofx-sfRCRuOYGCuyJNrlqtSwgfliMqCS0t0-HmubCGUUx6iLZsZCMg8BE4h8wJiQWMCYEYXAPapwLOnZK9uav-M0FA4eJQxRoBqpDaVpeICFIiXycpB3Dcn70dR6LbvtKEjQpFc9zLUIEMdZaizOfmI0rqbiV2y443m6lwPuqIBIYdUGr6ygLuKzCoXuDWAkFKrBHAwJ29Q1hptGb6hM0NJAjCMXbH0oeAI6GSympP9yUywQTcdHrVFD2tAp7HmF3eUMmD21d0wUmJeW-1BWHEOLJl5Cq8vJ1o2ebPpCJhF7AM-msHz_yd9Qe6n0TIUS4p9snd9tfMvyawrdwvAF1--LuIexSIa2G_LYSqm |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,729,782,786,866,887,2106,27933,27934,53801,53803 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
linkToHtml | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Nb9QwELVoOcCFggCxbQEjIQFC7ubTjrmVsmUR7aoSReJmOXbcRuwmUdNc-FP8RWacpCJw6y2K7ex4Z-x5L5kZE_I6jGyOZcYYYAHOkqQwLHNOsCTSidRwyf3LnOU3sfqRfVpgmRw-5sL4oH2TlwfVenNQlZc-trLZmPkYJzY_Oz0KsYgJIOP5FrkLCzYIR5Y-fD0QWRCPCTIZn7ch0gIG3omhx0oZHp4TCwHOTsQTf-TL9v-_Of8bMPmXBzreua3sD8mDAXPSw779EblTVI_J775uMa0d7dbwcy2er8QuutIWljb-Mw4QaOC9tMKgSOrTP-jbs8Xq8zuagwv8SeuKNrqsaJ_qSIcSrXSMA8N7AInpMB3_nLpr-8HaFhSGXpYNbfvM7A9UU3Cctt6Uv0CEIYZ-DZf-ZJEn5Pvx4vxoyYbTG5hJk_CaJdJmoAmOhM6ZyCJWSBKZp0IaWQBQy2MNWK4AzOXiQgCM1NoB3TQOGKN0PH5Ktqu6Kp4R6lIDj9JaC7CqKI8yK7kA2-M2DAxAxhl5P-pQNX2RDuXJTcZVr3wFylde-SqekY-o5pueWGDb36ivLtSgKgXk2kWZ5kEOlC2Nc2kczzWQqyiXAiSYkTdoJAq3AfgPjR6yGUBgLKilDgVHLpiFwYzsT3rC8jXT5tHM1LB9tArThfFlVAzCvrppxpEYElcVoCzfB3bbJILpZxPznMxs2gJW6UuIj1a4e_uhL8m95fnpiTr5svq6R-5HfnlJFqb7ZPv6qiuek63Wdi_8yvwDcJk-ZQ |
linkToPdf | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELZokRAXCgLEQgEjIQFCbjYvO-mttLsUAauVAImb5UfcRuwmUdNc-FP9i8w4SUXgBrfIj2Qcjz3fl8yMCXkZRlZjmjEGWICzJCkMy5wTLIlUkiu45P5jzukXsfqenSwwTc7hGAvjnfaNLg-qzfagKs-9b2WzNcHoJxasPx-HmMQEkHHQWBfskJuwaOfxyNSHPwgCisYgmYwHbYjUgIGFYmi1UoYH6MRCgMET8cQm-dT9f2_QfzpN_maFlnv_I_9dcmfAnvSob3OP3Ciq--Sqz19Ma0e7DTyyxXOW2FlX2sLSxv_OASIN_JdW6BxJfRgIfb1erN6_oRpM4Q9aV7RRZUX7kEc6pGqloz8YlgE0psOQ_H3qru07K1tQ6HpeNrTtI7QPqaJgQG29LX-CCIMv_QYu_QkjD8i35eLr8SkbTnFgJk3CS5bkNoPZ4EjsnIksYoYkyXUqcpMXANh0rADTFYC9XFwIgJNKOaCdxgFzzB2PH5Ldqq6KR4S61MCtlFICtCvSUWZzLkAHuQ3nBqDjjLwd51E2fbIO6UlOxmWvABIUQHoFkPGMvMOpvm6JibZ9QX1xJofpkkCyXZQpPtdA3dJY58ZxrYBkRToXIMGMvEJFkbgdwDs0aohqAIExsZY8Ehw5YRbOZ2R_0hKWsZlWj6omh22klRg2jB-lYhD2xXU19kTXuKqAyfJtYNdNIhh-NlHRycimNaCZPpX4qImP_73rc3JrfbKUnz6sPj4htyO_wnIWpvtk9_KiK56SndZ2z_zi_AVRcEDl |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect+of+ultrasound-guided+pericapsular+nerve+group+%28PENG%29+block+on+pain+during+patient+positioning+for+central+nervous+blockade+in+hip+surgery%3A+a+randomized+controlled+trial&rft.jtitle=BMC+anesthesiology&rft.au=Aygun%2C+Hakan&rft.au=Tulgar%2C+Serkan&rft.au=Yigit%2C+Yavuz&rft.au=Tasdemir%2C+Ay%C5%9Fe&rft.date=2023-09-15&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1471-2253&rft.volume=23&rft.spage=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12871-023-02245-3 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2253&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2253&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2253&client=summon |