CT image artifacts from brachytherapy seed implants: A postprocessing 3D adaptive median filter

• Published in: Medical physics (Lancaster) Vol. 38; no. 2; pp. 712 - 718
• Main Authors: Basran, Parminder S., Robertson, Andrew, Wells, Derek
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States American Association of Physicists in Medicine 01-02-2011
• Subjects: biological tissues; BIOPHYSICS; BRACHYTHERAPY; Brachytherapy - methods; CAT SCANNING; cellular biophysics; Computed radiography; Computed tomography; computerised tomography; DATASETS; Dosimetry; filtering theory; Humans; IMAGE PROCESSING; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods; median filter; median filters; Medical image artifacts; Medical image contrast; Medical image noise; medical image processing; Medical image quality; Medical image reconstruction; Medical imaging; METRICS; PHANTOMS; Phantoms, Imaging; postprocess; RADIATION SOURCE IMPLANTS; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; Subcellular structure and processes; Therapeutic applications, including brachytherapy; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods; Ultrasonography; CT; median filter; brachytherapy; postprocess; artifacts
• ISSN: 0094-2405; 2473-4209
• DOI: 10.1118/1.3539648

Purpose:
To design a postprocessing 3D adaptive median filter that minimizes streak artifacts and improves soft-tissue contrast in postoperative CT images of brachytherapy seed implantations.
Methods:
The filter works by identifying voxels that are likely streaks and estimating more reflective voxel intensity by using voxel intensities in adjacent CT slices and applying a median filter over voxels not identified as seeds. Median values are computed over a
5
×
5
×
5

mm
region of interest (ROI) within the CT volume. An acrylic phantom simulating a clinical seed implant arrangement and containing nonradioactive seeds was created. Low contrast subvolumes of tissuelike material were also embedded in the phantom. Pre- and postprocessed image quality metrics were compared using the standard deviation of ROIs between the seeds, the CT numbers of low contrast ROIs embedded within the phantom, the signal to noise ratio (SNR), and the contrast to noise ratio (CNR) of the low contrast ROIs. The method was demonstrated with a clinical postimplant CT dataset.
Results:
After the filter was applied, the standard deviation of CT values in streak artifact regions was significantly reduced from 76.5 to 7.2 HU. Within the observable low contrast plugs, the mean of all ROI standard deviations was significantly reduced from 60.5 to 3.9 HU, SNR significantly increased from 2.3 to 22.4, and CNR significantly increased from 0.2 to 4.1 (all
P
<
0.01
). The mean CT in the low contrast plugs remained within 5 HU of the original values.
Conclusion:
An efficient postprocessing filter that does not require access to projection data, which can be applied irrespective of CT scan parameters has been developed, provided the slice thickness and spacing is 3 mm or less.