Comparison of Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Models and Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque as Detected by Computed Tomography for Prediction of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients With Acute Chest Pain
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2012; 19:934–942 © 2012 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Objectives: The objective was to determine the association of four clinical risk scores and coronary plaque burden as detected by computed tomography (CT) with the outcome of acute coronary syndrome (...
Saved in:
Published in: | Academic emergency medicine Vol. 19; no. 8; pp. 934 - 942 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-08-2012
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2012; 19:934–942 © 2012 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Objectives: The objective was to determine the association of four clinical risk scores and coronary plaque burden as detected by computed tomography (CT) with the outcome of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients with acute chest pain. The hypothesis was that the combination of risk scores and plaque burden improved the discriminatory capacity for the diagnosis of ACS.
Methods: The study was a subanalysis of the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction Using Computer‐Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT) trial—a prospective observational cohort study. The authors enrolled patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with a chief complaint of acute chest pain, inconclusive initial evaluation (negative biomarkers, nondiagnostic electrocardiogram [ECG]), and no history of coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients underwent contrast‐enhanced 64‐multidetector‐row cardiac CT and received standard clinical care (serial ECG, cardiac biomarkers, and subsequent diagnostic testing, such as exercise treadmill testing, nuclear stress perfusion imaging, and/or invasive coronary angiography), as deemed clinically appropriate. The clinical providers were blinded to CT results. The chest pain score was calculated and the results were dichotomized to ≥10 (high‐risk) and <10 (low‐risk). Three risk scores were calculated, Goldman, Sanchis, and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI), and each patient was assigned to a low‐, intermediate‐, or high‐risk category. Because of the low number of subjects in the high‐risk group, the intermediate‐ and high‐risk groups were combined into one. CT images were evaluated for the presence of plaque in 17 coronary segments. Plaque burden was stratified into none, intermediate, and high (zero, one to four, and more than four segments with plaque). An outcome panel of two physicians (blinded to CT findings) established the primary outcome of ACS (defined as either an acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina) during the index hospitalization (from the presentation to the ED to the discharge from the hospital). Logistic regression modeling was performed to examine the association of risk scores and coronary plaque burden to the outcome of ACS. Unadjusted models were individually fitted for the coronary plaque burden and for Goldman, Sanchis, TIMI, and chest pain scores. In adjusted analyses, the authors tested whether the association between risk scores and ACS persisted after controlling for the coronary plaque burden. The prognostic discriminatory capacity of the risk scores and plaque burden for ACS was assessed using c‐statistics. The differences in area under the receiver‐operating characteristic curve (AUC) and c‐statistics were tested by performing the −2 log likelihood ratio test of nested models. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: Among 368 subjects, 31 (8%) subjects were diagnosed with ACS. Goldman (AUC = 0.61), Sanchis (AUC = 0.71), and TIMI (AUC = 0.63) had modest discriminatory capacity for the diagnosis of ACS. Plaque burden was the strongest predictor of ACS (AUC = 0.86; p < 0.05 for all comparisons with individual risk scores). The combination of plaque burden and risk scores improved prediction of ACS (plaque + Goldman AUC = 0.88, plaque + Sanchis AUC = 0.90, plaque + TIMI AUC = 0.88; p < 0.01 for all comparisons with coronary plaque burden alone).
Conclusions: Risk scores (Goldman, Sanchis, TIMI) have modest discriminatory capacity and coronary plaque burden has good discriminatory capacity for the diagnosis of ACS in patients with acute chest pain. The combined information of risk scores and plaque burden significantly improves the discriminatory capacity for the diagnosis of ACS. |
---|---|
AbstractList | ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2012; 19:934–942 © 2012 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Objectives: The objective was to determine the association of four clinical risk scores and coronary plaque burden as detected by computed tomography (CT) with the outcome of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients with acute chest pain. The hypothesis was that the combination of risk scores and plaque burden improved the discriminatory capacity for the diagnosis of ACS.
Methods: The study was a subanalysis of the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction Using Computer‐Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT) trial—a prospective observational cohort study. The authors enrolled patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with a chief complaint of acute chest pain, inconclusive initial evaluation (negative biomarkers, nondiagnostic electrocardiogram [ECG]), and no history of coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients underwent contrast‐enhanced 64‐multidetector‐row cardiac CT and received standard clinical care (serial ECG, cardiac biomarkers, and subsequent diagnostic testing, such as exercise treadmill testing, nuclear stress perfusion imaging, and/or invasive coronary angiography), as deemed clinically appropriate. The clinical providers were blinded to CT results. The chest pain score was calculated and the results were dichotomized to ≥10 (high‐risk) and <10 (low‐risk). Three risk scores were calculated, Goldman, Sanchis, and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI), and each patient was assigned to a low‐, intermediate‐, or high‐risk category. Because of the low number of subjects in the high‐risk group, the intermediate‐ and high‐risk groups were combined into one. CT images were evaluated for the presence of plaque in 17 coronary segments. Plaque burden was stratified into none, intermediate, and high (zero, one to four, and more than four segments with plaque). An outcome panel of two physicians (blinded to CT findings) established the primary outcome of ACS (defined as either an acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina) during the index hospitalization (from the presentation to the ED to the discharge from the hospital). Logistic regression modeling was performed to examine the association of risk scores and coronary plaque burden to the outcome of ACS. Unadjusted models were individually fitted for the coronary plaque burden and for Goldman, Sanchis, TIMI, and chest pain scores. In adjusted analyses, the authors tested whether the association between risk scores and ACS persisted after controlling for the coronary plaque burden. The prognostic discriminatory capacity of the risk scores and plaque burden for ACS was assessed using c‐statistics. The differences in area under the receiver‐operating characteristic curve (AUC) and c‐statistics were tested by performing the −2 log likelihood ratio test of nested models. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: Among 368 subjects, 31 (8%) subjects were diagnosed with ACS. Goldman (AUC = 0.61), Sanchis (AUC = 0.71), and TIMI (AUC = 0.63) had modest discriminatory capacity for the diagnosis of ACS. Plaque burden was the strongest predictor of ACS (AUC = 0.86; p < 0.05 for all comparisons with individual risk scores). The combination of plaque burden and risk scores improved prediction of ACS (plaque + Goldman AUC = 0.88, plaque + Sanchis AUC = 0.90, plaque + TIMI AUC = 0.88; p < 0.01 for all comparisons with coronary plaque burden alone).
Conclusions: Risk scores (Goldman, Sanchis, TIMI) have modest discriminatory capacity and coronary plaque burden has good discriminatory capacity for the diagnosis of ACS in patients with acute chest pain. The combined information of risk scores and plaque burden significantly improves the discriminatory capacity for the diagnosis of ACS. The objective was to determine the association of four clinical risk scores and coronary plaque burden as detected by computed tomography (CT) with the outcome of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients with acute chest pain. The hypothesis was that the combination of risk scores and plaque burden improved the discriminatory capacity for the diagnosis of ACS. The study was a subanalysis of the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction Using Computer-Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT) trial -- a prospective observational cohort study. The authors enrolled patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with a chief complaint of acute chest pain, inconclusive initial evaluation (negative biomarkers, nondiagnostic electrocardiogram [ECG]), and no history of coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients underwent contrast-enhanced 64-multidetector-row cardiac CT and received standard clinical care (serial ECG, cardiac biomarkers, and subsequent diagnostic testing, such as exercise treadmill testing, nuclear stress perfusion imaging, and/or invasive coronary angiography), as deemed clinically appropriate. The clinical providers were blinded to CT results. The chest pain score was calculated and the results were dichotomized to ≥10 (high-risk) and <10 (low-risk). Three risk scores were calculated, Goldman, Sanchis, and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI), and each patient was assigned to a low-, intermediate-, or high-risk category. Because of the low number of subjects in the high-risk group, the intermediate- and high-risk groups were combined into one. CT images were evaluated for the presence of plaque in 17 coronary segments. Plaque burden was stratified into none, intermediate, and high (zero, one to four, and more than four segments with plaque). An outcome panel of two physicians (blinded to CT findings) established the primary outcome of ACS (defined as either an acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina) during the index hospitalization (from the presentation to the ED to the discharge from the hospital). Logistic regression modeling was performed to examine the association of risk scores and coronary plaque burden to the outcome of ACS. Unadjusted models were individually fitted for the coronary plaque burden and for Goldman, Sanchis, TIMI, and chest pain scores. In adjusted analyses, the authors tested whether the association between risk scores and ACS persisted after controlling for the coronary plaque burden. The prognostic discriminatory capacity of the risk scores and plaque burden for ACS was assessed using c-statistics. The differences in area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) and c-statistics were tested by performing the -2 log likelihood ratio test of nested models. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Among 368 subjects, 31 (8%) subjects were diagnosed with ACS. Goldman (AUC = 0.61), Sanchis (AUC = 0.71), and TIMI (AUC = 0.63) had modest discriminatory capacity for the diagnosis of ACS. Plaque burden was the strongest predictor of ACS (AUC = 0.86; p < 0.05 for all comparisons with individual risk scores). The combination of plaque burden and risk scores improved prediction of ACS (plaque + Goldman AUC = 0.88, plaque + Sanchis AUC = 0.90, plaque + TIMI AUC = 0.88; p < 0.01 for all comparisons with coronary plaque burden alone). Risk scores (Goldman, Sanchis, TIMI) have modest discriminatory capacity and coronary plaque burden has good discriminatory capacity for the diagnosis of ACS in patients with acute chest pain. The combined information of risk scores and plaque burden significantly improves the discriminatory capacity for the diagnosis of ACS. OBJECTIVESThe objective was to determine the association of four clinical risk scores and coronary plaque burden as detected by computed tomography (CT) with the outcome of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients with acute chest pain. The hypothesis was that the combination of risk scores and plaque burden improved the discriminatory capacity for the diagnosis of ACS. METHODSThe study was a subanalysis of the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction Using Computer-Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT) trial-a prospective observational cohort study. The authors enrolled patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with a chief complaint of acute chest pain, inconclusive initial evaluation (negative biomarkers, nondiagnostic electrocardiogram [ECG]), and no history of coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients underwent contrast-enhanced 64-multidetector-row cardiac CT and received standard clinical care (serial ECG, cardiac biomarkers, and subsequent diagnostic testing, such as exercise treadmill testing, nuclear stress perfusion imaging, and/or invasive coronary angiography), as deemed clinically appropriate. The clinical providers were blinded to CT results. The chest pain score was calculated and the results were dichotomized to ≥10 (high-risk) and <10 (low-risk). Three risk scores were calculated, Goldman, Sanchis, and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI), and each patient was assigned to a low-, intermediate-, or high-risk category. Because of the low number of subjects in the high-risk group, the intermediate- and high-risk groups were combined into one. CT images were evaluated for the presence of plaque in 17 coronary segments. Plaque burden was stratified into none, intermediate, and high (zero, one to four, and more than four segments with plaque). An outcome panel of two physicians (blinded to CT findings) established the primary outcome of ACS (defined as either an acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina) during the index hospitalization (from the presentation to the ED to the discharge from the hospital). Logistic regression modeling was performed to examine the association of risk scores and coronary plaque burden to the outcome of ACS. Unadjusted models were individually fitted for the coronary plaque burden and for Goldman, Sanchis, TIMI, and chest pain scores. In adjusted analyses, the authors tested whether the association between risk scores and ACS persisted after controlling for the coronary plaque burden. The prognostic discriminatory capacity of the risk scores and plaque burden for ACS was assessed using c-statistics. The differences in area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) and c-statistics were tested by performing the -2 log likelihood ratio test of nested models. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTSAmong 368 subjects, 31 (8%) subjects were diagnosed with ACS. Goldman (AUC = 0.61), Sanchis (AUC = 0.71), and TIMI (AUC = 0.63) had modest discriminatory capacity for the diagnosis of ACS. Plaque burden was the strongest predictor of ACS (AUC = 0.86; p < 0.05 for all comparisons with individual risk scores). The combination of plaque burden and risk scores improved prediction of ACS (plaque + Goldman AUC = 0.88, plaque + Sanchis AUC = 0.90, plaque + TIMI AUC = 0.88; p < 0.01 for all comparisons with coronary plaque burden alone). CONCLUSIONSRisk scores (Goldman, Sanchis, TIMI) have modest discriminatory capacity and coronary plaque burden has good discriminatory capacity for the diagnosis of ACS in patients with acute chest pain. The combined information of risk scores and plaque burden significantly improves the discriminatory capacity for the diagnosis of ACS. The objective was to determine the association of four clinical risk scores and coronary plaque burden as detected by computed tomography (CT) with the outcome of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients with acute chest pain. The hypothesis was that the combination of risk scores and plaque burden improved the discriminatory capacity for the diagnosis of ACS. The study was a subanalysis of the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction Using Computer-Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT) trial-a prospective observational cohort study. The authors enrolled patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with a chief complaint of acute chest pain, inconclusive initial evaluation (negative biomarkers, nondiagnostic electrocardiogram [ECG]), and no history of coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients underwent contrast-enhanced 64-multidetector-row cardiac CT and received standard clinical care (serial ECG, cardiac biomarkers, and subsequent diagnostic testing, such as exercise treadmill testing, nuclear stress perfusion imaging, and/or invasive coronary angiography), as deemed clinically appropriate. The clinical providers were blinded to CT results. The chest pain score was calculated and the results were dichotomized to ≥10 (high-risk) and <10 (low-risk). Three risk scores were calculated, Goldman, Sanchis, and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI), and each patient was assigned to a low-, intermediate-, or high-risk category. Because of the low number of subjects in the high-risk group, the intermediate- and high-risk groups were combined into one. CT images were evaluated for the presence of plaque in 17 coronary segments. Plaque burden was stratified into none, intermediate, and high (zero, one to four, and more than four segments with plaque). An outcome panel of two physicians (blinded to CT findings) established the primary outcome of ACS (defined as either an acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina) during the index hospitalization (from the presentation to the ED to the discharge from the hospital). Logistic regression modeling was performed to examine the association of risk scores and coronary plaque burden to the outcome of ACS. Unadjusted models were individually fitted for the coronary plaque burden and for Goldman, Sanchis, TIMI, and chest pain scores. In adjusted analyses, the authors tested whether the association between risk scores and ACS persisted after controlling for the coronary plaque burden. The prognostic discriminatory capacity of the risk scores and plaque burden for ACS was assessed using c-statistics. The differences in area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) and c-statistics were tested by performing the -2 log likelihood ratio test of nested models. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Among 368 subjects, 31 (8%) subjects were diagnosed with ACS. Goldman (AUC = 0.61), Sanchis (AUC = 0.71), and TIMI (AUC = 0.63) had modest discriminatory capacity for the diagnosis of ACS. Plaque burden was the strongest predictor of ACS (AUC = 0.86; p < 0.05 for all comparisons with individual risk scores). The combination of plaque burden and risk scores improved prediction of ACS (plaque + Goldman AUC = 0.88, plaque + Sanchis AUC = 0.90, plaque + TIMI AUC = 0.88; p < 0.01 for all comparisons with coronary plaque burden alone). Risk scores (Goldman, Sanchis, TIMI) have modest discriminatory capacity and coronary plaque burden has good discriminatory capacity for the diagnosis of ACS in patients with acute chest pain. The combined information of risk scores and plaque burden significantly improves the discriminatory capacity for the diagnosis of ACS. |
Author | Seneviratne, Sujith Rogers, Ian S. Ferencik, Maros Pena, Antonio J. Hoffmann, Udo Parry, Blair Alden Nichols, John H. Brady, Thomas J. Shapiro, Michael D. Truong, Quynh A. Brown, David F. Schlett, Christopher L. Bamberg, Fabian Cury, Ricardo C. Nagurney, John T. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Maros surname: Ferencik fullname: Ferencik, Maros organization: From the Cardiology Division (MF, QAT), the Department of Radiology (CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), the Department of Emergency Medicine (BAP, DFB, JTN), and the Cardiac MR/PET/CT Program (MF, CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA – sequence: 2 givenname: Christopher L. surname: Schlett fullname: Schlett, Christopher L. organization: From the Cardiology Division (MF, QAT), the Department of Radiology (CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), the Department of Emergency Medicine (BAP, DFB, JTN), and the Cardiac MR/PET/CT Program (MF, CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA – sequence: 3 givenname: Fabian surname: Bamberg fullname: Bamberg, Fabian organization: From the Cardiology Division (MF, QAT), the Department of Radiology (CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), the Department of Emergency Medicine (BAP, DFB, JTN), and the Cardiac MR/PET/CT Program (MF, CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA – sequence: 4 givenname: Quynh A. surname: Truong fullname: Truong, Quynh A. organization: From the Cardiology Division (MF, QAT), the Department of Radiology (CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), the Department of Emergency Medicine (BAP, DFB, JTN), and the Cardiac MR/PET/CT Program (MF, CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA – sequence: 5 givenname: John H. surname: Nichols fullname: Nichols, John H. organization: From the Cardiology Division (MF, QAT), the Department of Radiology (CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), the Department of Emergency Medicine (BAP, DFB, JTN), and the Cardiac MR/PET/CT Program (MF, CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA – sequence: 6 givenname: Antonio J. surname: Pena fullname: Pena, Antonio J. organization: From the Cardiology Division (MF, QAT), the Department of Radiology (CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), the Department of Emergency Medicine (BAP, DFB, JTN), and the Cardiac MR/PET/CT Program (MF, CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA – sequence: 7 givenname: Michael D. surname: Shapiro fullname: Shapiro, Michael D. organization: From the Cardiology Division (MF, QAT), the Department of Radiology (CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), the Department of Emergency Medicine (BAP, DFB, JTN), and the Cardiac MR/PET/CT Program (MF, CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA – sequence: 8 givenname: Ian S. surname: Rogers fullname: Rogers, Ian S. organization: From the Cardiology Division (MF, QAT), the Department of Radiology (CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), the Department of Emergency Medicine (BAP, DFB, JTN), and the Cardiac MR/PET/CT Program (MF, CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA – sequence: 9 givenname: Sujith surname: Seneviratne fullname: Seneviratne, Sujith organization: From the Cardiology Division (MF, QAT), the Department of Radiology (CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), the Department of Emergency Medicine (BAP, DFB, JTN), and the Cardiac MR/PET/CT Program (MF, CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA – sequence: 10 givenname: Blair Alden surname: Parry fullname: Parry, Blair Alden organization: From the Cardiology Division (MF, QAT), the Department of Radiology (CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), the Department of Emergency Medicine (BAP, DFB, JTN), and the Cardiac MR/PET/CT Program (MF, CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA – sequence: 11 givenname: Ricardo C. surname: Cury fullname: Cury, Ricardo C. organization: From the Cardiology Division (MF, QAT), the Department of Radiology (CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), the Department of Emergency Medicine (BAP, DFB, JTN), and the Cardiac MR/PET/CT Program (MF, CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA – sequence: 12 givenname: Thomas J. surname: Brady fullname: Brady, Thomas J. organization: From the Cardiology Division (MF, QAT), the Department of Radiology (CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), the Department of Emergency Medicine (BAP, DFB, JTN), and the Cardiac MR/PET/CT Program (MF, CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA – sequence: 13 givenname: David F. surname: Brown fullname: Brown, David F. organization: From the Cardiology Division (MF, QAT), the Department of Radiology (CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), the Department of Emergency Medicine (BAP, DFB, JTN), and the Cardiac MR/PET/CT Program (MF, CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA – sequence: 14 givenname: John T. surname: Nagurney fullname: Nagurney, John T. organization: From the Cardiology Division (MF, QAT), the Department of Radiology (CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), the Department of Emergency Medicine (BAP, DFB, JTN), and the Cardiac MR/PET/CT Program (MF, CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA – sequence: 15 givenname: Udo surname: Hoffmann fullname: Hoffmann, Udo organization: From the Cardiology Division (MF, QAT), the Department of Radiology (CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), the Department of Emergency Medicine (BAP, DFB, JTN), and the Cardiac MR/PET/CT Program (MF, CLS, FB, QAT, JHN, AJP, MDS, ISR, SS, RCC, TJB, UH), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22849339$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNUk1vEzEQXaEi2gb-ArLEhcsGe72fF6RoaQtSChEEirhYXnu2cbprB9tbkl_I38JL2hQ44cN45HnzZsbzTqMjbTREESJ4SsJ5tZ6SLKNxUpBkmuBgMElJMd0-ik4OgaPg47yK8yynx9Gpc2uMcVZUxZPoOEnKtKK0Ool-1qbfcKuc0ci0aGm5VF4ZzTtUcyuVueVODB236KNyN-jSSOgc4lqi2tgAszs08yuwxokuWK8EWnT8-wCIO_QGPAgPEjU7NNYZRn9penNt-Wa1Q62xaGFBKjGWHOvPRMA8UH_aaWlND0hptOBegfYOXSm_ugeuwPkQUfpp9LjlnYNnd_ck-nx-tqzfxvMPF-_q2TwWWfihuMS0kYmAUlRpnvOStxXlrZCyFaJpijJN2vBaZlRiKkFSAljmFccBAJA3kk6i13vezdD0IEXoyPKObazqQ8PMcMX-jmi1YtfmltE0SVOcBoKXdwTWhG9ynvXKCeg6rsEMjhFM0zyrirCfSfTiH-jaDDasZo8qSJoRElDlHiXCEpyF9tAMwWxUC1uzURRsFAUb1cJ-q4VtQ-rzP4c5JN7L42HaH6qD3X8Ts1l9djm6gSDeEyjnYXsg4PaG5QUtMnb1_oJ9PZ8nNMm-sS_0F37B5XA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rcl_2014_11_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2013_08_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajem_2013_10_020 crossref_primary_10_1161_JAHA_124_034603 crossref_primary_10_1097_HPC_0000000000000062 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2018_09_021 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00059_015_4344_x crossref_primary_10_3904_kjim_2015_263 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10554_015_0698_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcct_2017_05_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cpcardiol_2014_05_002 crossref_primary_10_1161_CIRCOUTCOMES_113_000244 crossref_primary_10_1097_CRD_0000000000000015 crossref_primary_10_36660_abc_20210006 crossref_primary_10_1111_jth_13011 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.hlc.2010.01.004 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.064 10.1007/s10554-011-9889-z 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00160-5 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.058 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00696.x 10.1056/NEJM199610313351802 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.09.027 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.06.009 10.1197/j.aem.2006.09.051 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.08.011 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.618389 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.037 10.1001/jama.284.7.835 10.2307/2531595 10.1016/S0196-0644(97)70317-2 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.10.059 10.1056/NEJM199712043372302 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02336-7 10.1148/radiol.11110013 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.052 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.074 10.1067/mem.2002.129171 10.1001/jama.294.20.2623 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.964155 10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.12.008 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.12.043 10.1056/NEJM199606063342303 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699579 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.031 10.1002/sim.1047 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.01.032 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.058 10.1161/01.CIR.0000111517.69230.0F 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.01.022 10.1056/NEJMoa0806576 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.068 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.03.016 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.634808 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.03.058 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.04.022 10.1093/biomet/80.1.27 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.09.025 10.1053/euhj.1999.1860 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.031 10.1056/NEJM200004203421603 10.7326/0003-4819-129-11_Part_1-199812010-00002 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2012 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 2012 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Copyright Hanley & Belfus, Inc. Aug 2012 2012 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 2012 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2012 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine – notice: 2012 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. – notice: Copyright Hanley & Belfus, Inc. Aug 2012 – notice: 2012 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 2012 |
DBID | BSCLL CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION K9. NAPCQ U9A 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01417.x |
DatabaseName | Istex Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium Career and Technical Education (Alumni Edition) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: ECM name: MEDLINE url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1553-2712 |
EndPage | 942 |
ExternalDocumentID | 2742709231 10_1111_j_1553_2712_2012_01417_x 22849339 ACEM1417 ark_67375_WNG_XFL2325Z_V |
Genre | article Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NHLBI NIH HHS grantid: R01 HL080053 – fundername: NHLBI NIH HHS grantid: K24 HL113128 – fundername: NHLBI NIH HHS grantid: T32 HL076136 – fundername: NHLBI NIH HHS grantid: K23 HL098370 |
GroupedDBID | --- ..I .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 23M 24P 31~ 33P 36B 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5RE 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAWTL AAXRX AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABJNI ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFO ACGFS ACGOF ACMXC ACPOU ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFFNX AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFZJQ AHBTC AHMBA AIACR AIAGR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BAWUL BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DIK DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM E3Z EBS EJD EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC G-S G.N GODZA H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZ~ IX1 J0M K48 KBYEO LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N4W N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OK1 OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D P6G PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RWL RX1 SAMSI SJN SUPJJ TAE TEORI TR2 UB1 V8K V9Y W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WIN WOHZO WOW WQJ WRC WUP WVDHM WXI WXSBR XG1 ZGI ZZTAW ~IA ~WT CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAMNL AAYXX CITATION K9. NAPCQ U9A 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5417-803bd2ce8c9466a8af93afcddfccbb7842f6a8853d03ded31e0d69a0ddfee6bd3 |
IEDL.DBID | 33P |
ISSN | 1069-6563 |
IngestDate | Tue Sep 17 21:13:05 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 16 07:58:49 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 22:13:02 EDT 2024 Thu Nov 21 20:45:59 EST 2024 Sat Sep 28 07:53:00 EDT 2024 Sat Aug 24 00:54:13 EDT 2024 Wed Oct 30 09:59:40 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 8 |
Language | English |
License | 2012 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5417-803bd2ce8c9466a8af93afcddfccbb7842f6a8853d03ded31e0d69a0ddfee6bd3 |
Notes | istex:E47E20B8B1DC48FAC4A01F70C89E79CEEF52C7B0 ark:/67375/WNG-XFL2325Z-V ArticleID:ACEM1417 Drs. Ferencik, Rogers, Truong, and Shapiro were supported by the National Institutes of Health grant (T32 HL076136). Dr. Hoffmann has received research grants from Siemens Medical Solutions and General Electric Healthcare. Dr. Nagurney is funded by Biosite for a biomarker research study. The rest of the authors have no disclosures or potential conflicts of interest to report. Supervising Editor: Sarah A. Stahmer, MD. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (RO1 HL080053) and in part supported by Siemens Medical Solutions and General Electrics Healthcare. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01417.x |
PMID | 22849339 |
PQID | 1034714511 |
PQPubID | 30489 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3424404 proquest_miscellaneous_1034659749 proquest_journals_1034714511 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1553_2712_2012_01417_x pubmed_primary_22849339 wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1553_2712_2012_01417_x_ACEM1417 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_XFL2325Z_V |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | August 2012 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2012-08-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2012 text: August 2012 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Oxford, UK |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford, UK – name: United States – name: Des Plaines |
PublicationTitle | Academic emergency medicine |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Acad Emerg Med |
PublicationYear | 2012 |
Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
References | Selker HP, Beshansky JR, Griffith JL, et al. Use of the acute cardiac ischemia time-insensitive predictive instrument (ACI-TIPI) to assist with triage of patients with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia. A multicenter, controlled clinical trial. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:845-55. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:2135-44. Schlett CL, Banerji D, Siegel E, et al. Prognostic value of CT angiography for major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute chest pain from the emergency department 2-year outcomes of the ROMICAT trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:481-91. Geleijnse ML, Elhendy A, Kasprzak JD, et al. Safety and prognostic value of early dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography in patients with spontaneous chest pain and a non-diagnostic electrocardiogram. Eur Heart J. 2000;21:397-406. Manini AF, Dannemann N, Brown DF, et al. Limitations of risk score models in patients with acute chest pain. Am J Emerg Med. 2009;27:43-8. Gibler WB, Cannon CP, Blomkalns AL, et al. Practical implementation of the Guidelines for Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;46:185-97. Hoffmann U, Nagurney JT, Moselewski F, et al. Coronary multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain. Circulation. 2006;114:2251-60. Hollander JE, Litt HI, Chase M, Brown AM, Kim W, Baxt WG. Computed tomography coronary angiography for rapid disposition of low-risk emergency department patients with chest pain syndromes. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:112-6. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1724-32. D'Agostino RB Sr, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, et al. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2008;117:743-53. Goldstein JA, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Ross MA, O'Neil BJ, Raff GL. A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:863-71. Tatum JL, Jesse RL, Kontos MC, et al. Comprehensive strategy for the evaluation and triage of the chest pain patient. Ann Emerg Med. 1997;29:116-25. Cannon CP, McCabe CH, Stone PH, et al. The electrocardiogram predicts one-year outcome of patients with unstable angina and non-Q wave myocardial infarction: results of the TIMI III Registry ECG Ancillary Study. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:133-40. Leber AW, Becker A, Knez A, et al. Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:672-7. Rubinshtein R, Halon DA, Gaspar T, et al. Usefulness of 64-slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes and predicting clinical outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain of uncertain origin. Circulation. 2007;115:1762-8. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2324-36. Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: a method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. JAMA. 2000;284:835-42. Chase M, Robey JL, Zogby KE, Sease KL, Shofer FS, Hollander JE. Prospective validation of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score in the emergency department chest pain population. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48:252-9. van Velzen JE, de Graaf FR, Kroft LJ, et al. Performance and efficacy of 320-row computed tomography coronary angiography in patients presenting with acute chest pain: results from a clinical registry. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;28:865-76. Achenbach S, Moselewski F, Ropers D, et al. Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography. A segment-based comparison to intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 2004;109:14-7. Swap CJ, Nagurney JT. Value and limitations of chest pain history in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2005;294:2623-9. Chow BJ, Joseph P, Yam Y, et al. Usefulness of computed tomographic coronary angiography in patients with acute chest pain with and without high-risk features. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106:463-9. Han JH, Lindsell CJ, Storrow AB, et al. The role of cardiac risk factor burden in diagnosing acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department setting. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49:145-52. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143:29-36. Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R, et al. Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1163-70. Hollander JE, Chang AM, Shofer FS, McCusker CM, Baxt WG, Litt HI. Coronary computed tomographic angiography for rapid discharge of low-risk patients with potential acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;53:295-304. Chow BJ, Small G, Yam Y, et al. The incremental prognostic value of cardiac CT in CAD using CONFIRM (COroNary computed tomography angiography evaluation For clinical outcomes: an InteRnational Multicenter registry). Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:463-72. Chang SA, Choi SI, Choi EK, et al. Usefulness of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography as an initial diagnostic approach in patients with acute chest pain. Am Heart J. 2008;156:375-83. Antman EM, Tanasijevic MJ, Thompson B, et al. Cardiac-specific troponin I levels to predict the risk of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1342-9. Rubinshtein R, Halon DA, Gaspar T, et al. Usefulness of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography in diagnostic triage of patients with chest pain and negative or nondiagnostic exercise treadmill test result. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:925-9. Body R, McDowell G, Carley S, Mackway-Jones K. Do risk factors for chronic coronary heart disease help diagnose acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department? Resuscitation. 2008;79:41-5. Goldman L, Cook EF, Johnson PA, Brand DA, Rouan GW, Lee TH. Prediction of the need for intensive care in patients who come to the emergency departments with acute chest pain. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1498-504. Hansen M, Ginns J, Seneviratne S, et al. The value of dual-source 64-slice CT coronary angiography in the assessment of patients presenting to an acute chest pain service. Heart Lung Circ. 2010;19:213-8. Nasis A, Meredith IT, Nerlekar N, et al. Acute chest pain investigation: utility of cardiac CT angiography in guiding troponin measurement. Radiology. 2011;260:381-9. Hess EP, Perry JJ, Calder LA, et al. Prospective validation of a modified Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction risk score in emergency department patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17:368-75. Firth D. Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika. 1993;80:27-38. Baxt WG, Shofer FS, Sites FD, Hollander JE. A neural network aid for the early diagnosis of cardiac ischemia in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;40:575-83. Min JK, Dunning A, Lin FY, et al. Age- and sex-related differences in all-cause mortality risk based on coronary computed tomography angiography findings results from the international multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: an International Multicenter Registry) of 23,854 patients without known coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:849-60. Sanchis J, Bodi V, Nunez J, et al. New risk score for patients with acute chest pain, non-ST-segment deviation, and normal troponin concentrations: a comparison with the TIMI risk score. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:443-9. Hoffmann U, Bamberg F, Chae CU, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain: the ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1642-50. Pollack CV, Sites FD, Shofer FS, Sease KL, Hollander JE. Application of the TIMI risk score for unstable angina and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome to an unselected emergency department population. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13:13-8. Heinze G, Schemper M. A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Stat Med. 2002;21:2409-19. Hamm CW, Goldmann BU, Heeschen C, Kreymann G, Berger J, Meinertz T. Emergency room triage of patients with acute chest pain by means of rapid testing for cardiac troponin T or troponin I. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1648-53. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837-45. Goldstein JA, Chinnaiyan KM, Abidov A, et al. The CT-STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1414-22. Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH, et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1318-33. Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley J 1997; 337 2005; 294 2011 2010; 19 2006; 13 2010; 106 2010; 17 2000; 21 1997; 29 2008; 79 1982; 143 2011; 57 2008; 52 2011; 58 2004; 109 2011; 4 2007; 99 2009; 27 2007; 14 2005; 46 2006; 114 2007; 115 2009; 53 1997; 30 2002; 40 2006; 47 2002; 21 2006; 48 1998; 129 1988; 44 2000; 284 2008; 359 2008; 117 1993; 80 2012; 28 2000; 342 1996; 335 2008; 156 1996; 334 2011; 260 2003; 42 2007; 49 12383588 - J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Oct 2;40(7):1366-74 3203132 - Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45 21730027 - Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Sep;4(5):463-72 17075011 - Circulation. 2006 Nov 21;114(21):2251-60 10938172 - JAMA. 2000 Aug 16;284(7):835-42 21688136 - Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jun;28(5):1173-80 17398185 - Am J Cardiol. 2007 Apr 1;99(7):925-9 16458154 - J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Feb 7;47(3):672-7 12210625 - Stat Med. 2002 Aug 30;21(16):2409-19 21835321 - J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 16;58(8):849-60 21673228 - Radiology. 2011 Aug;260(2):381-9 19095130 - J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Dec 16;52(25):2135-44 8998090 - Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Jan;29(1):116-25 17267528 - Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Feb;14(2):112-6 14522503 - J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Oct 1;42(7):1318-33 18996620 - Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Mar;53(3):295-304 18691797 - Resuscitation. 2008 Oct;79(1):41-5 10770981 - N Engl J Med. 2000 Apr 20;342(16):1163-70 16934646 - Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Sep;48(3):252-9 16365321 - Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jan;13(1):13-8 20691302 - Am J Cardiol. 2010 Aug 15;106(4):463-9 8618604 - N Engl J Med. 1996 Jun 6;334(23):1498-504 9867725 - Ann Intern Med. 1998 Dec 1;129(11):845-55 7063747 - Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36 19007693 - J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Nov 18;52(21):1724-32 21565735 - JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 May;4(5):481-91 16046952 - Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Aug;46(2):185-97 21658564 - J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jun 14;57(24):2426-36 19038879 - N Engl J Med. 2008 Nov 27;359(22):2324-36 9385123 - N Engl J Med. 1997 Dec 4;337(23):1648-53 10666354 - Eur Heart J. 2000 Mar;21(5):397-406 17145112 - Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Feb;49(2):145-52, 152.e1 19041532 - Am J Emerg Med. 2009 Jan;27(1):43-8 8857017 - N Engl J Med. 1996 Oct 31;335(18):1342-9 9207634 - J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Jul;30(1):133-40 20149728 - Heart Lung Circ. 2010 Apr;19(4):213-8 14691045 - Circulation. 2004 Jan 6;109(1):14-7 17372178 - Circulation. 2007 Apr 3;115(13):1762-8 18657674 - Am Heart J. 2008 Aug;156(2):375-83 19406338 - J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 May 5;53(18):1642-50 21614485 - Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Apr;28(4):865-76 16304077 - JAMA. 2005 Nov 23;294(20):2623-9 12447333 - Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Dec;40(6):575-83 21939822 - J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Sep 27;58(14):1414-22 17320744 - J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Feb 27;49(8):863-71 20370775 - Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Apr;17(4):368-75 16053956 - J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Aug 2;46(3):443-9 18212285 - Circulation. 2008 Feb 12;117(6):743-53 e_1_2_7_5_2 e_1_2_7_3_2 e_1_2_7_9_2 e_1_2_7_7_2 e_1_2_7_19_2 e_1_2_7_17_2 e_1_2_7_15_2 e_1_2_7_13_2 e_1_2_7_41_2 e_1_2_7_11_2 e_1_2_7_43_2 e_1_2_7_45_2 e_1_2_7_47_2 e_1_2_7_26_2 e_1_2_7_49_2 e_1_2_7_28_2 e_1_2_7_50_2 e_1_2_7_25_2 e_1_2_7_23_2 e_1_2_7_31_2 e_1_2_7_21_2 e_1_2_7_33_2 e_1_2_7_35_2 e_1_2_7_37_2 e_1_2_7_39_2 Goldstein JA (e_1_2_7_27_2) 2007; 49 Marwan M (e_1_2_7_30_2) 2011 e_1_2_7_4_2 e_1_2_7_2_2 e_1_2_7_8_2 e_1_2_7_6_2 e_1_2_7_18_2 e_1_2_7_16_2 e_1_2_7_14_2 e_1_2_7_40_2 e_1_2_7_12_2 e_1_2_7_42_2 e_1_2_7_10_2 e_1_2_7_44_2 e_1_2_7_46_2 e_1_2_7_48_2 e_1_2_7_29_2 e_1_2_7_24_2 e_1_2_7_22_2 e_1_2_7_32_2 e_1_2_7_20_2 e_1_2_7_34_2 e_1_2_7_36_2 e_1_2_7_38_2 |
References_xml | – volume: 294 start-page: 2623 year: 2005 end-page: 9 article-title: Value and limitations of chest pain history in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes publication-title: JAMA. – volume: 4 start-page: 481 year: 2011 end-page: 91 article-title: Prognostic value of CT angiography for major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute chest pain from the emergency department 2‐year outcomes of the ROMICAT trial publication-title: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. – volume: 47 start-page: 672 year: 2006 end-page: 7 article-title: Accuracy of 64‐slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol. – volume: 58 start-page: 849 year: 2011 end-page: 60 article-title: Age‐ and sex‐related differences in all‐cause mortality risk based on coronary computed tomography angiography findings results from the international multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: an International Multicenter Registry) of 23,854 patients without known coronary artery disease publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol. – volume: 14 start-page: 112 year: 2007 end-page: 6 article-title: Computed tomography coronary angiography for rapid disposition of low‐risk emergency department patients with chest pain syndromes publication-title: Acad Emerg Med. – volume: 30 start-page: 133 year: 1997 end-page: 40 article-title: The electrocardiogram predicts one‐year outcome of patients with unstable angina and non‐Q wave myocardial infarction: results of the TIMI III Registry ECG Ancillary Study. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Ischemia publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol. – volume: 28 start-page: 865 year: 2012 end-page: 76 article-title: Performance and efficacy of 320‐row computed tomography coronary angiography in patients presenting with acute chest pain: results from a clinical registry publication-title: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. – volume: 42 start-page: 1318 year: 2003 end-page: 33 article-title: ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging‐‐executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging) publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol. – volume: 29 start-page: 116 year: 1997 end-page: 25 article-title: Comprehensive strategy for the evaluation and triage of the chest pain patient publication-title: Ann Emerg Med. – volume: 46 start-page: 443 year: 2005 end-page: 9 article-title: New risk score for patients with acute chest pain, non‐ST‐segment deviation, and normal troponin concentrations: a comparison with the TIMI risk score publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol. – volume: 260 start-page: 381 year: 2011 end-page: 9 article-title: Acute chest pain investigation: utility of cardiac CT angiography in guiding troponin measurement publication-title: Radiology. – volume: 53 start-page: 295 year: 2009 end-page: 304 article-title: Coronary computed tomographic angiography for rapid discharge of low‐risk patients with potential acute coronary syndromes publication-title: Ann Emerg Med. – volume: 13 start-page: 13 year: 2006 end-page: 8 article-title: Application of the TIMI risk score for unstable angina and non‐ST elevation acute coronary syndrome to an unselected emergency department population publication-title: Acad Emerg Med. – volume: 17 start-page: 368 year: 2010 end-page: 75 article-title: Prospective validation of a modified Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction risk score in emergency department patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome publication-title: Acad Emerg Med. – volume: 114 start-page: 2251 year: 2006 end-page: 60 article-title: Coronary multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain publication-title: Circulation. – volume: 4 start-page: 463 year: 2011 end-page: 72 article-title: The incremental prognostic value of cardiac CT in CAD using CONFIRM (COroNary computed tomography angiography evaluation For clinical outcomes: an InteRnational Multicenter registry) publication-title: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. – volume: 99 start-page: 925 year: 2007 end-page: 9 article-title: Usefulness of 64‐slice multidetector computed tomography in diagnostic triage of patients with chest pain and negative or nondiagnostic exercise treadmill test result publication-title: Am J Cardiol. – volume: 156 start-page: 375 year: 2008 end-page: 83 article-title: Usefulness of 64‐slice multidetector computed tomography as an initial diagnostic approach in patients with acute chest pain publication-title: Am Heart J. – volume: 19 start-page: 213 year: 2010 end-page: 8 article-title: The value of dual‐source 64‐slice CT coronary angiography in the assessment of patients presenting to an acute chest pain service publication-title: Heart Lung Circ. – volume: 80 start-page: 27 year: 1993 end-page: 38 article-title: Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates publication-title: Biometrika. – volume: 129 start-page: 845 year: 1998 end-page: 55 article-title: Use of the acute cardiac ischemia time‐insensitive predictive instrument (ACI‐TIPI) to assist with triage of patients with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia. A multicenter, controlled clinical trial publication-title: Ann Intern Med. – volume: 337 start-page: 1648 year: 1997 end-page: 53 article-title: Emergency room triage of patients with acute chest pain by means of rapid testing for cardiac troponin T or troponin I publication-title: N Engl J Med. – volume: 335 start-page: 1342 year: 1996 end-page: 9 article-title: Cardiac‐specific troponin I levels to predict the risk of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes publication-title: N Engl J Med. – volume: 46 start-page: 185 year: 2005 end-page: 97 article-title: Practical implementation of the Guidelines for Unstable Angina/Non‐ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the emergency department publication-title: Ann Emerg Med. – volume: 49 start-page: 145 year: 2007 end-page: 52 article-title: The role of cardiac risk factor burden in diagnosing acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department setting publication-title: Ann Emerg Med. – volume: 52 start-page: 2135 year: 2008 end-page: 44 article-title: Diagnostic accuracy of 64‐slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol. – volume: 40 start-page: 1366 year: 2002 end-page: 74 article-title: ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction‐‐summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina) publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol. – volume: 48 start-page: 252 year: 2006 end-page: 9 article-title: Prospective validation of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score in the emergency department chest pain population publication-title: Ann Emerg Med. – volume: 52 start-page: 1724 year: 2008 end-page: 32 article-title: Diagnostic performance of 64‐multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol. – volume: 21 start-page: 2409 year: 2002 end-page: 19 article-title: A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression publication-title: Stat Med. – volume: 53 start-page: 1642 year: 2009 end-page: 50 article-title: Coronary computed tomography angiography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain: the ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography) trial publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol. – volume: 117 start-page: 743 year: 2008 end-page: 53 article-title: General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study publication-title: Circulation. – volume: 334 start-page: 1498 year: 1996 end-page: 504 article-title: Prediction of the need for intensive care in patients who come to the emergency departments with acute chest pain publication-title: N Engl J Med. – volume: 49 start-page: 863 year: 2007 end-page: 71 article-title: A randomized controlled trial of multi‐slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol. – volume: 342 start-page: 1163 year: 2000 end-page: 70 article-title: Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department publication-title: N Engl J Med. – year: 2011 article-title: Accuracy of dual‐source CT to identify significant coronary artery disease in patients with uncontrolled hypertension presenting with chest pain: comparison with coronary angiography publication-title: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. – volume: 106 start-page: 463 year: 2010 end-page: 9 article-title: Usefulness of computed tomographic coronary angiography in patients with acute chest pain with and without high‐risk features publication-title: Am J Cardiol. – volume: 284 start-page: 835 year: 2000 end-page: 42 article-title: The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non‐ST elevation MI: a method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making publication-title: JAMA. – volume: 40 start-page: 575 year: 2002 end-page: 83 article-title: A neural network aid for the early diagnosis of cardiac ischemia in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain publication-title: Ann Emerg Med. – volume: 21 start-page: 397 year: 2000 end-page: 406 article-title: Safety and prognostic value of early dobutamine‐atropine stress echocardiography in patients with spontaneous chest pain and a non‐diagnostic electrocardiogram publication-title: Eur Heart J. – volume: 27 start-page: 43 year: 2009 end-page: 8 article-title: Limitations of risk score models in patients with acute chest pain publication-title: Am J Emerg Med. – volume: 109 start-page: 14 year: 2004 end-page: 7 article-title: Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast‐enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography. A segment‐based comparison to intravascular ultrasound publication-title: Circulation. – volume: 44 start-page: 837 year: 1988 end-page: 45 article-title: Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach publication-title: Biometrics. – volume: 115 start-page: 1762 year: 2007 end-page: 8 article-title: Usefulness of 64‐slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes and predicting clinical outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain of uncertain origin publication-title: Circulation. – volume: 359 start-page: 2324 year: 2008 end-page: 36 article-title: Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64‐row CT publication-title: N Engl J Med. – volume: 143 start-page: 29 year: 1982 end-page: 36 article-title: The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve publication-title: Radiology. – volume: 79 start-page: 41 year: 2008 end-page: 5 article-title: Do risk factors for chronic coronary heart disease help diagnose acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department? publication-title: Resuscitation. – volume: 58 start-page: 1414 year: 2011 end-page: 22 article-title: The CT‐STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) trial publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol. – volume: 57 start-page: 2426 year: 2011 end-page: 36 article-title: Meta‐analysis and systematic review of the long‐term predictive value of assessment of coronary atherosclerosis by contrast‐enhanced coronary computed tomography angiography publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol. – year: 2011 ident: e_1_2_7_30_2 article-title: Accuracy of dual‐source CT to identify significant coronary artery disease in patients with uncontrolled hypertension presenting with chest pain: comparison with coronary angiography publication-title: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. contributor: fullname: Marwan M – ident: e_1_2_7_31_2 doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2010.01.004 – volume: 49 start-page: 863 year: 2007 ident: e_1_2_7_27_2 article-title: A randomized controlled trial of multi‐slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.064 contributor: fullname: Goldstein JA – ident: e_1_2_7_42_2 doi: 10.1007/s10554-011-9889-z – ident: e_1_2_7_3_2 doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00160-5 – ident: e_1_2_7_21_2 doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.058 – ident: e_1_2_7_50_2 doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00696.x – ident: e_1_2_7_4_2 doi: 10.1056/NEJM199610313351802 – ident: e_1_2_7_17_2 doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.09.027 – ident: e_1_2_7_18_2 doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.06.009 – ident: e_1_2_7_43_2 doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.09.051 – ident: e_1_2_7_9_2 doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.08.011 – ident: e_1_2_7_25_2 doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.618389 – ident: e_1_2_7_13_2 doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.037 – ident: e_1_2_7_11_2 doi: 10.1001/jama.284.7.835 – ident: e_1_2_7_38_2 doi: 10.2307/2531595 – ident: e_1_2_7_7_2 doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(97)70317-2 – ident: e_1_2_7_26_2 doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.10.059 – ident: e_1_2_7_5_2 doi: 10.1056/NEJM199712043372302 – ident: e_1_2_7_8_2 doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02336-7 – ident: e_1_2_7_32_2 doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110013 – ident: e_1_2_7_29_2 doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.052 – ident: e_1_2_7_47_2 doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.074 – ident: e_1_2_7_14_2 doi: 10.1067/mem.2002.129171 – ident: e_1_2_7_2_2 doi: 10.1001/jama.294.20.2623 – ident: e_1_2_7_46_2 doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.964155 – ident: e_1_2_7_44_2 doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.12.008 – ident: e_1_2_7_45_2 doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.12.043 – ident: e_1_2_7_12_2 doi: 10.1056/NEJM199606063342303 – ident: e_1_2_7_39_2 doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699579 – ident: e_1_2_7_20_2 doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.031 – ident: e_1_2_7_36_2 doi: 10.1002/sim.1047 – ident: e_1_2_7_48_2 doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.01.032 – ident: e_1_2_7_23_2 doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.058 – ident: e_1_2_7_22_2 doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000111517.69230.0F – ident: e_1_2_7_16_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.01.022 – ident: e_1_2_7_19_2 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806576 – ident: e_1_2_7_33_2 doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.068 – ident: e_1_2_7_28_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.03.016 – ident: e_1_2_7_24_2 doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.634808 – ident: e_1_2_7_41_2 doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.03.058 – ident: e_1_2_7_10_2 doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.04.022 – ident: e_1_2_7_35_2 doi: 10.1093/biomet/80.1.27 – ident: e_1_2_7_37_2 doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 – ident: e_1_2_7_40_2 doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.09.025 – ident: e_1_2_7_34_2 doi: 10.1053/euhj.1999.1860 – ident: e_1_2_7_49_2 doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.031 – ident: e_1_2_7_6_2 doi: 10.1056/NEJM200004203421603 – ident: e_1_2_7_15_2 doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-129-11_Part_1-199812010-00002 |
SSID | ssj0005797 |
Score | 2.1584728 |
Snippet | ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2012; 19:934–942 © 2012 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Objectives: The objective was to determine the association... The objective was to determine the association of four clinical risk scores and coronary plaque burden as detected by computed tomography (CT) with the outcome... OBJECTIVESThe objective was to determine the association of four clinical risk scores and coronary plaque burden as detected by computed tomography (CT) with... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest crossref pubmed wiley istex |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 934 |
SubjectTerms | Acute Coronary Syndrome - complications Acute Coronary Syndrome - diagnosis Acute Coronary Syndrome - diagnostic imaging Acute coronary syndromes Acute Pain Atherosclerosis Chest Pain - etiology Coronary Artery Disease - diagnostic imaging Emergency medical care Female Humans Male Medical diagnosis Middle Aged Pain Plaque, Atherosclerotic - diagnostic imaging Prospective Studies Risk Assessment - methods Risk Factors Tomography Tomography, X-Ray Computed |
Title | Comparison of Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Models and Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque as Detected by Computed Tomography for Prediction of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients With Acute Chest Pain |
URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-XFL2325Z-V/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1553-2712.2012.01417.x https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22849339 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1034714511 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1034659749 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3424404 |
Volume | 19 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Nb9QwELWgSIgL35RAQYOEuAUlcRInx1W6S4VotaKFVlwsO7bVqCVBm65UfiF_i5kkmzaiB4S4RfbYjuOZ-Nkev2HsrcIpKUQY6yuhHS5QktTP8kT4RocadbrMMkN7unuH4uAk250TTc7HzV2Ynh9i3HAjy-j-12TgSrdTI08S7kcipPtUtKUXxqF4T3gSFw3dbQ6-vPL2EH2clSAlb4-UT516bqxoMlPdoY9-eRMM_dOb8jrK7aapxYP_2cGH7P4AVmHWa9cjdsvWj9nd_eE4_gn7VYxRDKFxgPOeqfq9RSgmfq7wuWrPgOKunbegagMFESfgq8GMAGjTYvWrBluB5bnCjoNqYdfS-YY1oH_CEHvCwFHzfeDYBkTbsFzRu1CT1P6sRJmrqg8HMgaoalj29LEtHFcXpxtBChWGOVX9lH1ZzI-KPX-IDOGXSdxNq1ybqLRZSfT4KlMu58qVxriy1FpkceQwFZGICbixhoc2MGmuAhSwNtWGP2NbdVPb5wxiTBA8MqnLyjgNXW50wIXWQWSC3GrnsXCjBfJHTwAiry2ccIQkjZCkEZLdCMlLj73r1GUsoFZn5EAnEnl88EGeLD4hjk2-ya8e29nokxz-HS3WzhExEG-cx96M2Wj1dJSjatuse5mU1oK5x7Z79RsbixBx5Jxjjpgo5ihAjOLTnLo67ZjFOV17DGIs2SnmX3dYzor5Pj2--OeSL9k9Su99K3fY1sVqbV-x261Zv-4s-TeE1UpR |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,782,786,887,1408,27933,27934,46064,46488 |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3fb9MwELZgk4AXfg8KAw4J8RaUxEmcPFZdS9HaqmKFTbxYduxo0UaCmlUafyH_FndJmi1iDwjxVsVnO67v4s_n83eMvVO4JHkIYx0ldIYblDBy4iQUjtGeRp1O49iQT3d6JBYn8cGYaHIOt3dhGn6IzuFGllF_r8nAySHdt_Iw5I4vPLpQRT49L_DEBwSUu0GEekn3OfjyKt5DNJlW3IjiPSLeD-u5saXeWrVLf_vlTUD0z3jK6zi3XqgmD_7rEB-y-y1ehWGjYI_YLVs8Znfm7Yn8E_Zr1CUyhDIDXPpM3rgXYdQLdYXPeXUGlHrtvAJVGBgRdwK-GwwJg5YVNr8usRdYniscOagKDiwdcVgD-ie06ScMrMrvLc02IOCG5Zrehbqk_ocpylw1fdTyMUBewLJhkK3gOL843QpStjAsyYun7MtkvBpNnTY5hJOGQb2ycm381MYpMeSrWGUJV1lqTJamWos48DN8imDEuNxYwz3rmihRLgpYG2nD99hOURb2OYMAHwjumyiL0yDyssRolwutXd-4idXZgHlbNZA_Gg4QeW3vhDMkaYYkzZCsZ0heDtj7Wl-6Cmp9RjF0IpTHi4_yZDJDKBt-k18HbH-rULL9fFTYOkfQQNRxA_a2K0bDp9McVdhy08hEtB1MBuxZo39dZz6CjoRzLBE9zewEiFS8X1LkpzW5OKebj26ANWvN_OsBy-FoPKefL_655ht2d7qaz-Ts0-LwJbtHMk2o5T7buVhv7Ct2uzKb17VZ_wY-Fk55 |
linkToPdf | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELaglSoulDcpBQYJcQtK4iROjqt9UKBdrWihFRfLjh01akmqTVcqv5C_xUySTRvRA0LcVvHYjtczmc_2-BvG3ip0ST7CWFcJneMCJYrdJI2Ea7SvUaezJDG0p7t3KOYnyWRKNDmf1ndhWn6IfsONLKP5XpOBX5h8aORRxN1A-HSfirb0_NAX7xFPboaIyolHn_PFdbiHaBOteDGFe8R8GNVza0sDV7VJ__rVbTj0z3DKmzC38VOz7f85wgfsfodWYdSq10N2x5aP2NZBdx7_mP0a92kMocoBHZ8p2s1FGA8CXeFLUZ8BJV47r0GVBsbEnICvBiNCoFWNzS8r7AUW5woHDqqGiaUDDmtA_4Qu-YSBo-pHR7INCLdhsaR3oS6p_1GGMtdNH3ZsDFCUsGj5Y2s4Li5P14KUKwxLivIJ-zqbHo333C41hJtFYeNXuTZBZpOM-PFVovKUqzwzJs8yrUUSBjk-RShiPG6s4b71TJwqDwWsjbXhT9lGWZX2OYMQHwgemDhPsjD289RojwutvcB4qdW5w_y1FsiLlgFE3lg54QxJmiFJMySbGZJXDnvXqEtfQS3PKIJORPJ4_kGezPYRyEbf5TeH7a71SXYfjxpb5wgZiDjOYW_6YjR7OstRpa1WrUxMi8HUYc9a9es7CxBypJxjiRgoZi9AlOLDkrI4bajFOd179EKs2SjmXw9YjsbTA_q58881X7OtxWQm9z_OP79g90ikjbPcZRuXy5V9ye7WZvWqMerf6O1NHw |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+Traditional+Cardiovascular+Risk+Models+and+Coronary+Atherosclerotic+Plaque+as+Detected+by+Computed+Tomography+for+Prediction+of+Acute+Coronary+Syndrome+in+Patients+With+Acute+Chest+Pain&rft.jtitle=Academic+emergency+medicine&rft.au=Ferencik%2C+Maros&rft.au=Schlett%2C+Christopher+L.&rft.au=Bamberg%2C+Fabian&rft.au=Truong%2C+Quynh+A.&rft.date=2012-08-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Publishing+Ltd&rft.issn=1069-6563&rft.eissn=1553-2712&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=934&rft.epage=942&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1553-2712.2012.01417.x&rft.externalDBID=10.1111%252Fj.1553-2712.2012.01417.x&rft.externalDocID=ACEM1417 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1069-6563&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1069-6563&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1069-6563&client=summon |