A procedure‐specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty

Summary The PROSPECT Working Group, a collaboration of anaesthetists and surgeons, conducts systematic reviews of postoperative pain management for different surgical procedures (http://www.postoppain.org). Evidence‐based consensus recommendations for the effective management of postoperative pain a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Anaesthesia Vol. 63; no. 10; pp. 1105 - 1123
Main Authors: Fischer, H. B. J., Simanski, C. J. P., Sharp, C., Bonnet, F., Camu, F., Neugebauer, E. A. M., Rawal, N., Joshi, G. P., Schug, S. A., Kehlet, H.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-10-2008
Blackwell
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary The PROSPECT Working Group, a collaboration of anaesthetists and surgeons, conducts systematic reviews of postoperative pain management for different surgical procedures (http://www.postoppain.org). Evidence‐based consensus recommendations for the effective management of postoperative pain are then developed from these systematic reviews, incorporating clinical practice observations, and transferable evidence from other relevant procedures. We present the results of a systematic review of pain and other outcomes following analgesic, anaesthetic and surgical interventions for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The evidence from this review supports the use of general anaesthesia combined with a femoral nerve block for surgery and postoperative analgesia, or alternatively spinal anaesthesia with local anaesthetic plus spinal morphine. The primary technique, together with cooling and compression techniques, should be supplemented with paracetamol and conventional non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs or COX‐2‐selective inhibitors, plus intravenous strong opioids (high‐intensity pain) or weak opioids (moderate‐ to low‐intensity pain).
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Feature-6
ObjectType-Review-2
ObjectType-Conference-4
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Article-5
ISSN:0003-2409
1365-2044
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05565.x