Density-Dependent Habitat Selection and Performance by a Large Mobile Reef Fish

Many exploited reef fish are vulnerable to overfishing because they concentrate over hard-bottom patchy habitats. How mobile reef fish use patchy habitat, and the potential consequences on demographic parameters, must be known for spatially explicit population dynamics modeling, for discriminating e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological applications Vol. 16; no. 2; pp. 731 - 746
Main Authors: Lindberg, William J., Frazer, Thomas K., Portier, Kenneth M., Vose, Frederic, Loftin, James, Murie, Debra J., Mason, Doran M., Nagy, Brian, Hart, Mary K.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Ecological Society of America 01-04-2006
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Many exploited reef fish are vulnerable to overfishing because they concentrate over hard-bottom patchy habitats. How mobile reef fish use patchy habitat, and the potential consequences on demographic parameters, must be known for spatially explicit population dynamics modeling, for discriminating essential fish habitat (EFH), and for effectively planning conservation measures (e.g., marine protected areas, stock enhancement, and artificial reefs). Gag, Mycteroperca microlepis, is an ecologically and economically important warm-temperate grouper in the southeastern United States, with behavioral and life history traits conducive to large-scale field experiments. The Suwannee Regional Reef System (SRRS) was built of standard habitat units (SHUs) in 1991-1993 to manipulate and control habitat patchiness and intrinsic habitat quality, and thereby test predictions from habitat selection theory. Colonization of the SRRS by gag over the first six years showed significant interactions of SHU size, spacing, and reef age; with trajectories modeled using a quadratic function for closely spaced SHUs (25 m) and a linear model for widely spaced SHUs (225 m), with larger SHUs (16 standardized cubes) accumulating significantly more gag faster than smaller 4-cube SHUs (mean = 72.5 gag/16-cube SHU at 225-m spacing by year 6, compared to 24.2 gag/4-cube SHU for same spacing and reef age). Residency times (mean = 9.8 mo), indicative of choice and measured by ultrasonic telemetry (1995-1998), showed significant interaction of SHU size and spacing consistent with colonization trajectories. Average relative weight$(W_{\rm{r}})$and incremental growth were greater on smaller than larger SHUs (mean$W_{\rm{r}}$= 104.2 vs. 97.7; incremental growth differed by 15%), contrary to patterns of abundance and residency. Experimental manipulation of shelter on a subset of SRRS sites (2000-2001) confirmed our hypothesis that shelter limits local densities of gag, which, in turn, regulates their growth and condition. Density-dependent habitat selection for shelter and individual growth dynamics were therefore interdependent ecological processes that help to explain how patchy reef habitat sustains gag production. Moreover, gag selected shelter at the expense of maximizing their growth. Thus, mobile reef fishes could experience density-dependent effects on growth, survival, and/or reproduction (i.e., demographic parameters) despite reduced stock sizes as a consequence of fishing.
Bibliography:E‐mail
Corresponding Editor: P. S. Levin.
5
6
7
8
9
Present address: Golder Associates, Inc., 6241 NW 23rd Street, Gainesville, Florida 32606 USA.
wjl@ufl.edu
Present address: Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506 USA.
Present address: American Cancer Society, 1599 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, Georgia 32329 USA.
Present address: School of Marine Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04473 USA
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1051-0761
1939-5582
DOI:10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[0731:DHSAPB]2.0.CO;2