Evaluation of the Capacity to Appoint a Healthcare Proxy

The appointment of a healthcare proxy is the most common way through which patients appoint a surrogate decision maker in anticipation of a future time in which they may lack the ability to make medical decisions themselves. In some situations, when a patient has not previously appointed a surrogate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of geriatric psychiatry Vol. 21; no. 4; pp. 326 - 336
Main Authors: Moye, Jennifer, Ph.D, Sabatino, Charles P., J.D, Weintraub Brendel, Rebecca, M.D., J.D
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Elsevier Inc 01-04-2013
Elsevier Limited
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The appointment of a healthcare proxy is the most common way through which patients appoint a surrogate decision maker in anticipation of a future time in which they may lack the ability to make medical decisions themselves. In some situations, when a patient has not previously appointed a surrogate decision maker through an advance directive, the healthcare team may ask whether the patient, although lacking the capacity to make a healthcare decision, might still have the capacity to appoint a healthcare proxy. In this article the authors summarize the existing, albeit limited, legal and empirical basis for this capacity and propose a model for assessing capacity to appoint a healthcare proxy that incorporates clinical factors in the context of the risks and benefits specific to surrogate appointment under the law. In particular, it is important to weigh patients' understanding and choice within the context of the risks and benefits of the medical and interpersonal factors. Questions to guide capacity assessment are provided for clinical use and refinement through future research.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Case Study-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Feature-5
ObjectType-Article-4
ObjectType-Report-1
ISSN:1064-7481
1545-7214
DOI:10.1016/j.jagp.2012.09.001