Capturing the Complexity of Intergenerational Relations: Exploring Ambivalence within Later-Life Families

This article reports on a study that incorporates two dimensions of complexity in intergenerational relations. First, the article focuses on ambivalence: the simultaneous existence of positive and negative sentiments in the older parent–adult child relationship. Second, the research described here a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of social issues Vol. 63; no. 4; pp. 775 - 791
Main Authors: Pillemer, Karl, Suitor, J. Jill, Mock, Steven E., Sabir, Myra, Pardo, Tamara B., Sechrist, Jori
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01-12-2007
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article reports on a study that incorporates two dimensions of complexity in intergenerational relations. First, the article focuses on ambivalence: the simultaneous existence of positive and negative sentiments in the older parent–adult child relationship. Second, the research described here applies a within‐family design to the study of ambivalence, using a data set that includes 566 older mothers' assessments of ambivalence toward all of their adult children. The findings provide general support for our conceptual approach to parental ambivalence that highlights conflict between norms regarding solidarity with children and expectations that adult children should become independent. Lower ambivalence was related to an adult child's being married. Children's problems were positively associated with ambivalence, as was the mother's perception that exchange in the relationship was inequitable in the child's favor. Mother's health status and her perception that she and the child shared the same values were negatively associated with ambivalence. Finally, Black mothers reported higher levels of ambivalence than did White mothers, but the multivariate models explaining ambivalence did not vary by race.
Bibliography:ArticleID:JOSI536
istex:3A0727A5FF8B84D7019E74FC706498A6DBF0A2FD
ark:/67375/WNG-MT1FD5Q1-6
This project was supported by Grant RO1 AG18869‐01 from the National Institute on Aging (J. Suitor and K. Pillemer, Co‐Principal Investigators). K. Pillemer also acknowledges support from Grant 1 P30 AG022845, an Edward R. Roybal Center grant from the National Institute on Aging (K. Pillemer, Principal Investigator). We thank Michael Bisciglia, Rachel Brown, Ilana S. Feld, Alison Green, Kimberly Gusman, Jennifer Jones, Dorothy Mecom, Michael Patterson, and Monisa Shackelford for their assistance in preparing the data for analysis and for participating in the analysis of the qualitative data. We also thank Mary Ellen Colten and her colleagues at the University of Massachusetts, Boston for collecting the data for the project.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0022-4537
1540-4560
DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00536.x