Sisters in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: communal coping, social integration, and psychological well-being

• Published in: Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England) Vol. 17; no. 8; pp. 812 - 821
• Main Authors: Koehly, Laura M., Peters, June A., Kuhn, Natalia, Hoskins, Lindsey, Letocha, Anne, Kenen, Regina, Loud, Jennifer, Greene, Mark H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01-08-2008; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Adaptation, Psychological; Adult; Breast cancer; Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology; Breast Neoplasms - genetics; Breast Neoplasms - psychology; communal coping; Cooperative Behavior; Coping; Depression - epidemiology; Depression - psychology; Families & family life; Female; Genes, BRCA1; Genes, BRCA2; hereditary breast and ovarian cancer; Humans; Middle Aged; Oncology; Ovarian cancer; Ovarian Neoplasms - epidemiology; Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics; Ovarian Neoplasms - psychology; Point Mutation - genetics; Psychological distress; Psychology; Quality of Life - psychology; Sibling Relations; Siblings; Siblings - psychology; Sisters; Social Support; Surveys and Questionnaires; Young Adult; United States > US
• ISSN: 1057-9249; 1099-1611; 1099-1611
• DOI: 10.1002/pon.1373

Objective: We investigated the association between psychological distress and indices of social integration and communal coping among sisters from hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) families.
Sample and methods: Sixty‐five sisters from 31 HBOC families completed the Brief Symptom Inventory‐18 and the Colored Eco‐Genetic Relationship Map, which identified members of participants' social support networks. Hierarchical linear models were used for all analyses to account for the clustering of sisters within families.
Results: Intra‐family correlation coefficients suggested that sisters shared perceptions of breast cancer risk and worry, but not ovarian cancer risk and worry. Further, sisters demonstrated shared levels of anxiety and somatization, but not depressive symptoms. Communal coping indices quantifying shared support resources were negatively related to anxiety and somatization. The number of persons with whom cancer risk information was shared exhibited a positive trend with somatization. Social integration, as measured by the size of participants' emotional support network, was negatively associated with anxiety. Lower depression scores were observed among participants with more persons playing multiple support roles and fewer persons providing tangible assistance.
Conclusion: Understanding how support relationships impact well‐being among persons adjusting to HBOC risk, and the particular role of family in that process, will facilitate developing appropriate management approaches to help cancer‐prone families adjust to their cancer risk. Published in 2008 by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.