Foraging bumblebees acquire a preference for neonicotinoid-treated food with prolonged exposure

• Published in: Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Vol. 285; no. 1885; p. 20180655
• Main Authors: Arce, Andres N, Ramos Rodrigues, Ana, Yu, Jiajun, Colgan, Thomas J, Wurm, Yannick, Gill, Richard J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England The Royal Society 29-08-2018
• Subjects: Animals; Bees; Diet; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Ecology; Feeding Behavior - drug effects; Food Preferences - drug effects; Insecticides - analysis; Thiamethoxam - analysis; Time Factors; aversion; risk; insect pollinator; chronic exposure; hazard; thiamethoxam
• DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0655
• EISSN: 1471-2954
• ISSN: 0962-8452

Social bees represent an important group of pollinating insects that can be exposed to potentially harmful pesticides when foraging on treated or contaminated flowering plants. To investigate if such exposure is detrimental to bees, many studies have exclusively fed individuals with pesticide-spiked food, informing us about the hazard but not necessarily the risk of exposure. While such studies are important to establish the physiological and behavioural effects on individuals, they do not consider the possibility that the risk of exposure may change over time. For example, many pesticide assays exclude potential behavioural adaptations to novel toxins, such as rejection of harmful compounds by choosing to feed on an uncontaminated food source, thus behaviourally lowering the risk of exposure. In this paper, we conducted an experiment over 10 days in which bumblebees could forage on an array of sucrose feeders containing 0, 2 and 11 parts per billion of the neonicotinoid pesticide thiamethoxam. This more closely mimics pesticide exposure in the wild by allowing foraging bees to (i) experience a field realistic range of pesticide concentrations across a chronic exposure period, (ii) have repeated interactions with the pesticide in their environment, and (iii) retain the social cues associated with foraging by using whole colonies. We found that the proportion of visits to pesticide-laced feeders increased over time, resulting in greater consumption of pesticide-laced sucrose relative to untreated sucrose. After changing the spatial position of each feeder, foragers continued to preferentially visit the pesticide-laced feeders which indicates that workers can detect thiamethoxam and alter their behaviour to continue feeding on it. The increasing preference for consuming the neonicotinoid-treated food therefore increases the risk of exposure for the colony during prolonged pesticide exposure. Our results highlight the need to incorporate attractiveness of pesticides to foraging bees (and potentially other insect pollinators) in addition to simply considering the proportion of pesticide-contaminated floral resources within the foraging landscape.