Patient, clinician and logistic barriers to blood pressure control among adult hypertensives in rural district hospitals in Rwanda: a cross-sectional study

• Published in: BMC cardiovascular disorders Vol. 19; no. 1; p. 231
• Main Authors: Sibomana, J P, McNamara, R L, Walker, T D
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 21-10-2019; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Antihypertensive agents; Blood pressure; Care and treatment; Comorbidity; Cross-sectional studies; Diuretics; Education; Health aspects; Health care costs; Hypertension; Medical research; Medication adherence; Patient compliance; Pharmacy; Public health; Sub-Saharan Africa; World health; Rwanda; Medication adherence; Cross-sectional studies; Antihypertensive agents; Sub-Saharan Africa
• ISSN: 1471-2261; 1471-2261
• DOI: 10.1186/s12872-019-1203-3

Hypertension management in rural, resource-poor settings is difficult. Detailed understanding of patient, clinician and logistic factors which pose barriers to effective blood pressure control could enable strategies to improve control to be implemented.
This cross-sectional, multifactorial, observational study was conducted at four rural Rwandan district hospitals, examining patient, clinician and logistic factors. Questionnaires were administered to consenting adult outpatient hypertensive patients, obtaining information on sociodemographic factors, past management for hypertension, and adherence (by Morisky Medication Adherence 8-item Scale (MMAS-8). Treating clinicians identified local difficulties in providing hypertension management from a standard World Health Organisation list and nominated their preferred treatment regimens. Blood pressure measurements and other clinical data were collected during the study visit and used to determine blood pressure control, according to goals from JNC-8 guidelines. Medication availability and cost at each hospital's pharmacy were reviewed as logistic barriers to treatment.
The 112 participating patients were 80% female, with only 41% having completed primary education. Self-reported adherence by the MMAS-8 was high in 77% (86/112) and significantly associated) with literacy, lack of medication side effects and the particular hospital and pharmacy attended (all p < 0.05). However, of 89 patients with blood pressure data, only 26 (29%) had achieved goal blood pressure. No patient factor were statistically associated with poor blood pressure control. Among 30 participating clinicians, deficiencies in knowledge were evident; 43% (13/30) and 37% (11/30) chose a loop diuretic as their prescribed medication and as an ideal medication, respectively, for a newly diagnosed hypertensive patient without comorbidities, counter to JNC 8 recommendations, and 50% (15/30) identified clinician non-adherence to hypertension guidelines as a barrier. In the pharmacies, common anti-hypertensive medications were affordably available (> 6 out of 8 examined medications available in all pharmacies, cost <US$0.50 per month); however, clinicians perceived medication cost and availability to be barriers to care.
Clinician-based factors are a major barrier to blood pressure control in rural district hospitals in Rwanda, and blood pressure control overall was poor. Patient and logistic barriers to blood pressure were not evident in this study.