critical comparison between two classical and a kit-based method for mitochondria isolation
Numerous protocols for isolation of mitochondria are available. Here, three methods for the isolation of intact mitochondria from mouse liver tissues are compared with regard to yield, purity and activity. Mitochondria were isolated by sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation, free-flow electrop...
Saved in:
Published in: | Proteomics (Weinheim) Vol. 9; no. 11; pp. 3209 - 3214 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Weinheim
Wiley-VCH Verlag
01-06-2009
WILEY-VCH Verlag WILEY‐VCH Verlag Wiley-VCH |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Numerous protocols for isolation of mitochondria are available. Here, three methods for the isolation of intact mitochondria from mouse liver tissues are compared with regard to yield, purity and activity. Mitochondria were isolated by sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation, free-flow electrophoresis or a commercially available kit-based method. Our analyses show that the sophisticated (and most expensive) free-flow electrophoresis method enables isolation of intact mitochondria with an enrichment of approximately 70%. Using the classical density centrifugation method is very laborious and time-consuming, but delivers about 57% intact mitochondria. Using standard laboratory equipment in a quick and simple procedure, the kit provides approximately 50% intact mitochondria, suitable for most standard investigations. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200800344 ArticleID:PMIC200800344 istex:F6E540B3DABD48B1AB655E1A91D2FCD590E12070 ark:/67375/WNG-XJ29F7WJ-J ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1615-9853 1615-9861 |
DOI: | 10.1002/pmic.200800344 |