critical comparison between two classical and a kit-based method for mitochondria isolation

Numerous protocols for isolation of mitochondria are available. Here, three methods for the isolation of intact mitochondria from mouse liver tissues are compared with regard to yield, purity and activity. Mitochondria were isolated by sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation, free-flow electrop...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proteomics (Weinheim) Vol. 9; no. 11; pp. 3209 - 3214
Main Authors: Hartwig, Sonja, Feckler, Christian, Lehr, Stefan, Wallbrecht, Katrin, Wolgast, Heike, Müller-Wieland, Dirk, Kotzka, Jörg
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Weinheim Wiley-VCH Verlag 01-06-2009
WILEY-VCH Verlag
WILEY‐VCH Verlag
Wiley-VCH
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Numerous protocols for isolation of mitochondria are available. Here, three methods for the isolation of intact mitochondria from mouse liver tissues are compared with regard to yield, purity and activity. Mitochondria were isolated by sucrose density gradient ultracentrifugation, free-flow electrophoresis or a commercially available kit-based method. Our analyses show that the sophisticated (and most expensive) free-flow electrophoresis method enables isolation of intact mitochondria with an enrichment of approximately 70%. Using the classical density centrifugation method is very laborious and time-consuming, but delivers about 57% intact mitochondria. Using standard laboratory equipment in a quick and simple procedure, the kit provides approximately 50% intact mitochondria, suitable for most standard investigations.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200800344
ArticleID:PMIC200800344
istex:F6E540B3DABD48B1AB655E1A91D2FCD590E12070
ark:/67375/WNG-XJ29F7WJ-J
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1615-9853
1615-9861
DOI:10.1002/pmic.200800344