Use of novel monoclonal antibodies to determine the expression and distribution of the hypoxia regulatory factors PHD-1, PHD-2, PHD-3 and FIH in normal and neoplastic human tissues

Aims : The cellular response to hypoxia includes the hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)‐induced transcription of genes involved in diverse processes such as glycolysis, angiogenesis and the growth of experimental tumours. Regulation of the level of hypoxia inducible factors 1α and 2α (HIF‐1α and HIF‐2α)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Histopathology Vol. 47; no. 6; pp. 602 - 610
Main Authors: Soilleux, E J, Turley, H, Tian, Y M, Pugh, C W, Gatter, K C, Harris, A L
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01-12-2005
Blackwell
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aims : The cellular response to hypoxia includes the hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)‐induced transcription of genes involved in diverse processes such as glycolysis, angiogenesis and the growth of experimental tumours. Regulation of the level of hypoxia inducible factors 1α and 2α (HIF‐1α and HIF‐2α) is a primary determinant of HIF activity. Recent biochemical and candidate gene approach studies have led to the discovery of three HIF‐regulatory prolyl hydroxylases, PHD‐1, ‐2 and ‐3 and an asparaginyl hydroxylase, also known as FIH (factor inhibiting HIF). In this study, we raised and characterized monoclonal antibodies against PHD‐1, PHD‐2, PHD‐3 and FIH. Methods and results : Immunohistochemistry of normal tissues with these monoclonal antibodies demonstrated a wide distribution in epithelial cells, stromal cells and leucocytes, with cytoplasmic staining predominating over nuclear staining. A preliminary study of tumours showed variable staining in tumour, stromal and inflammatory cells. While all tumour types showed some positive staining with each antibody, the overall pattern suggested a slight decrease in the amount of staining seen with PHD‐1, ‐2 and ‐3 and an increase in FIH staining in neoplasia compared with corresponding normal tissues. Conclusions : These monoclonal antibodies will allow further larger scale studies to determine the significance of PHD and FIH expression in neoplasia.
Bibliography:istex:5E79536CBF79CC9D71137398DB314F2B16E56326
ark:/67375/WNG-NH2M2HF4-C
ArticleID:HIS2280
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0309-0167
1365-2559
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02280.x