Evidence from a BreastScreen cohort does not support a longer inter-screen interval in women who have no conventional risk factors for breast cancer

• Published in: Breast (Edinburgh) Vol. 62; pp. 16 - 21
• Main Authors: Noguchi, Naomi, Marinovich, Michael Luke, Wylie, Elizabeth Jane, Lund, Helen Gabriel, Houssami, Nehmat
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier Ltd 01-04-2022; Elsevier
• Subjects: Breast cancer; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology; Cohort Studies; Early Detection of Cancer; Epidemiology; Female; Humans; Mammography; Mass Screening; Original; Population screening; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Risk-stratified screening; Population screening; Risk-stratified screening; Breast cancer; Epidemiology
• ISSN: 0960-9776; 1532-3080
• DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.01.015

To determine screening outcomes in women who have no recorded risk factors for breast cancer.
A retrospective population-based cohort study included all 1,026,137 mammography screening episodes in 323,082 women attending the BreastScreen Western Australia (part of national biennial screening) program between July 2007 and June 2017. Cancer detection rates (CDR) and interval cancer rates (ICR) were calculated in screening episodes with no recorded risk factors for breast cancer versus at least one risk factor stratified by age. CDR was further stratified by timeliness of screening (<27 versus ≥27 months); ICR was stratified by breast density.
Amongst 566,948 screens (55.3%) that had no recorded risk factors, 2347 (40.9%) screen-detected cancers were observed. In screens with no risk factors, CDR was 50 (95%CI 48–52) per 10,000 screens and ICR was 7.9 (95%CI 7.4–8.4) per 10,000 women-years, estimates that were lower than screens with at least one risk factor (CDR 83 (95%CI 80–86) per 10,000 screens, ICR 12.2 (95%CI 11.5–13.0) per 10,000 women-years). Compared to timely screens with risk factors, delayed screens with no risk factors had similar CDR across all age groups and a higher proportion of node positive cancers (26.1% vs 20.7%). ICR was lowest in screens that had no risk factors nor dense breasts in all age groups.
Majority of screens had no recorded breast cancer risk factors, hence a substantial proportion of screen-detected cancers occur in these screening episodes. Our findings may not justify less frequent screening in women with no risk factors.
•40.9% of screen-detected breast cancers occurred in women with no risk factors.•Cancer detection rate was 50/10,000 in screens with no risk factors.•Cancer size and nodal status were no more favourable in screens with no risk factors.•Interval cancer rate was lowest in screens with no risk factors nor dense breasts.•Our findings may not justify less frequent screening in women with no risk factors.