Single nucleotide polymorphisms for pig identification and parentage exclusion

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have become an important type of marker for commercial diagnostic and parentage genotyping applications as automated genotyping systems have been developed that yield accurate genotypes. Unfortunately, allele frequencies for public SNP markers in commercial pig...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animal genetics Vol. 38; no. 3; pp. 253 - 258
Main Authors: Rohrer, G.A, Freking, B.A, Nonneman, D
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-06-2007
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have become an important type of marker for commercial diagnostic and parentage genotyping applications as automated genotyping systems have been developed that yield accurate genotypes. Unfortunately, allele frequencies for public SNP markers in commercial pig populations have not been available. To fulfil this need, SNP markers previously mapped in the USMARC swine reference population were tested in a panel of 155 boars that were representative of US purebred Duroc, Hampshire, Landrace and Yorkshire populations. Multiplex assay groups of 5-7 SNP assays/group were designed and genotypes were determined using Sequenom's massarray system. Of 80 SNPs that were evaluated, 60 SNPs with minor allele frequencies >0.15 were selected for the final panel of markers. Overall identity power across breeds was 4.6 x 10⁻²³, but within-breed values ranged from 4.3 x 10⁻¹⁴ (Hampshire) to 2.6 x 10⁻²² (Yorkshire). Parentage exclusion probability with only one sampled parent was 0.9974 (all data) and ranged from 0.9594 (Hampshire) to 0.9963 (Yorkshire) within breeds. Sire exclusion probability when the dam's genotype was known was 0.99998 (all data) and ranged from 0.99868 (Hampshire) to 0.99997 (Yorkshire) within breeds. Power of exclusion was compared between the 60 SNP and 10 microsatellite markers. The parental exclusion probabilities for SNP and microsatellite marker panels were similar, but the SNP panel was much more sensitive for individual identification. This panel of SNP markers is theoretically sufficient for individual identification of any pig in the world and is publicly available.
Bibliography:http://hdl.handle.net/10113/13558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01593.x
istex:C3A80A203D02CDA93F367FDD1B4559C8D888FB7A
ark:/67375/WNG-X04RMPW7-V
ArticleID:AGE1593
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0268-9146
1365-2052
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01593.x