Data-poor management of African lion hunting using a relative index of abundance
Sustainable management of terrestrial hunting requires managers to set quotas restricting offtake. This often takes place in the absence of reliable information on the population size, and as a consequence, quotas are set in an arbitrary fashion, leading to population decline and revenue loss. In th...
Saved in:
Published in: | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 111; no. 1; pp. 539 - 543 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
National Academy of Sciences
07-01-2014
National Acad Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Sustainable management of terrestrial hunting requires managers to set quotas restricting offtake. This often takes place in the absence of reliable information on the population size, and as a consequence, quotas are set in an arbitrary fashion, leading to population decline and revenue loss. In this investigation, we show how an indirect measure of abundance can be used to set quotas in a sustainable manner, even in the absence of information on population size. Focusing on lion hunting in Africa, we developed a simple algorithm to convert changes in the number of safari days required to kill a lion into a quota for the following year. This was tested against a simulation model of population dynamics, accounting for uncertainties in demography, observation, and implementation. Results showed it to reliably set sustainable quotas despite these uncertainties, providing a robust foundation for the conservation of hunted species. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219615110 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Edited by Stephen Polasky, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, and approved November 13, 2013 (received for review December 2, 2012) Author contributions: C.T.T.E. designed research; C.T.T.E. performed research; N.B. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; C.T.T.E. analyzed data; and C.T.T.E., N.B., G.A.B., and E.J.M.-G. wrote the paper. |
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.1219615110 |