Physicians approach shared decision-making for sports eligibility decisions heterogeneously

• Published in: American heart journal plus Vol. 40; p. 100371
• Main Authors: Montembeau, Sarah C., Kim, Jonathan H., Baugh, Christine M., Campbell, Eric G., Baggish, Aaron L., Dickert, Neal W.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-04-2024; Elsevier
• Subjects: Athletes; Cardiologists; Cardiovascular diseases; Research Paper; Return to sport; Shared decision-making; Sports; Cardiologists; Return to sport; Athletes; Cardiovascular diseases; Shared decision-making; Sports
• ISSN: 2666-6022; 2666-6022
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100371

There is limited data regarding how clinicians operationalize shared decision-making (SDM) with athletes with cardiovascular diagnoses. This study was designed to explore sports cardiologists' conceptions of SDM and approaches to sports eligibility decisions.
20 sports cardiologists were interviewed by telephone or video conference from October 2022 to May 2023. Qualitative descriptive analysis was conducted with the transcripts.
All participants endorsed SDM for eligibility decisions, however, SDM was defined and operationalized heterogeneously. Only 6 participants specifically referenced eliciting patient preferences during SDM. Participants described variable roles for the physician in SDM and variable views on athletes' understanding, perception, and tolerance of risk. Participants thresholds for prohibitive annual risk of sudden cardiac death ranged from <1 % to >10 %.
These findings reinforce the general acceptance of SDM for sports eligibility decisions and highlight the need to better understand this process and identify the most effective approach for operationalization.