Efficacy of etanercept in the tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome: A prospective, open-label, dose-escalation study

Objective To investigate the efficacy of etanercept in improving the symptoms and underlying inflammation in patients with tumor necrosis factor receptor–associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS). Methods Fifteen patients with TRAPS were enrolled in a prospective, open‐label, dose‐escalation study. Patie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) Vol. 64; no. 3; pp. 908 - 913
Main Authors: Bulua, Ariel C., Mogul, Douglas B., Aksentijevich, Ivona, Singh, Harjot, He, David Y., Muenz, Larry R., Ward, Michael M., Yarboro, Cheryl H., Kastner, Daniel L., Siegel, Richard M., Hull, Keith M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01-03-2012
Wiley
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective To investigate the efficacy of etanercept in improving the symptoms and underlying inflammation in patients with tumor necrosis factor receptor–associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS). Methods Fifteen patients with TRAPS were enrolled in a prospective, open‐label, dose‐escalation study. Patients recorded attacks, symptom severity, and use of ancillary medications in a daily diary. Blood samples were collected during each period and measured for levels of acute‐phase reactants. Between 7 years and 9 years after the conclusion of the initial study, patients completed a followup survey and were evaluated to determine the long‐term outcome of etanercept treatment. Results Etanercept treatment significantly attenuated the total symptom score and reduced the frequency of symptoms. Etanercept also reduced levels of acute‐phase reactants, particularly during asymptomatic periods. During a 10‐year followup period, patients continued to receive etanercept for a median of 3.3 years, with a number of patients switching to anti–interleukin‐1β receptor therapy or not receiving biologic agents, most frequently citing injection site reactions and lack of efficacy as reasons for discontinuation. However, patients continuing to receive etanercept had reduced symptoms at followup. Conclusion Etanercept reduces symptoms and serum levels of inflammatory markers of TRAPS in a dose‐dependent manner, but does not completely normalize symptoms or acute‐phase reactant levels. Although long‐term adherence to etanercept is poor, continuing to receive etanercept may provide continued symptomatic benefit.
Bibliography:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00001373.
ArticleID:ART33416
Pfizer
NIH Clinical Research Training Program
istex:3C2C30A70EC95CD5DAA78372099F010091DE2236
ark:/67375/WNG-KWSM9FQ4-4
NIH
Drs. Siegel and Hull contributed equally to this work.
ISSN:0004-3591
2326-5191
1529-0131
2326-5205
DOI:10.1002/art.33416