Evaluating the Efficacy of Two Regional Pain Management Modalities in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

At our institution, multimodal opiate-sparing pain management is the cornerstone of our enhanced recovery program for autologous breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes and pain control metrics following implementation of an enhanced recovery program wi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open Vol. 10; no. 1; p. e4010
Main Authors: Rendon, Juan L., Borrell-Vega, Jaume, Reyes, Joshua-Paolo C., Wang, Diana M., Roeth, Cory, Abdel-Rasoul, Mahmoud, Skoracki, Roman J., Harter, Ronald L., Moffatt-Bruce, Susan D., Humeidan, Michelle L.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 19-01-2022
Wolters Kluwer
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract At our institution, multimodal opiate-sparing pain management is the cornerstone of our enhanced recovery program for autologous breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes and pain control metrics following implementation of an enhanced recovery program with two different regional analgesia approaches. This retrospective cohort study identified 145 women who underwent autologous breast reconstruction from 2015 to 2017. Three groups were included: historical control patients (n = 46) and enhanced recovery patients that received multimodal pain management including a postoperative transversalis abdominis plane block with either a continuous local anesthetic catheter (n = 60) or a single-shot of liposomal bupivacaine (n = 39). The primary outcome was pain scores in the first three postoperative days. Secondary outcomes were opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents and length of stay. Postoperative pain scores were similar across all three groups until postoperative day 3. Length of stay was significantly shorter in both of the enhanced recovery cohorts (3.0 [3.0, 4.0]) compared with control patients (4.0 [4.0, 5.0], < 0.001). Likewise, average total oral morphine equivalents consumption was significantly reduced in enhanced recovery patients (continuous catheter 215.9 (95% CI, 165.4-266.3); liposomal bupivacaine 211.0 (95% CI, 154.8-267.2); control 518.4 (95% CI 454.2-582.7), < 0.001). Neither length of stay ( = 0.953), nor oral morphine equivalents consumption ( = 0.883) differed by type of regional analgesia. Compared with control patients, both approaches to regional transversalis abdominis plane block analgesia as part of an opiate-sparing enhanced recovery pain management strategy were successful, but neither superior to the other.
AbstractList Background:. At our institution, multimodal opiate-sparing pain management is the cornerstone of our enhanced recovery program for autologous breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes and pain control metrics following implementation of an enhanced recovery program with two different regional analgesia approaches. Methods:. This retrospective cohort study identified 145 women who underwent autologous breast reconstruction from 2015 to 2017. Three groups were included: historical control patients (n = 46) and enhanced recovery patients that received multimodal pain management including a postoperative transversalis abdominis plane block with either a continuous local anesthetic catheter (n = 60) or a single-shot of liposomal bupivacaine (n = 39). The primary outcome was pain scores in the first three postoperative days. Secondary outcomes were opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents and length of stay. Results:. Postoperative pain scores were similar across all three groups until postoperative day 3. Length of stay was significantly shorter in both of the enhanced recovery cohorts (3.0 [3.0, 4.0]) compared with control patients (4.0 [4.0, 5.0], P < 0.001). Likewise, average total oral morphine equivalents consumption was significantly reduced in enhanced recovery patients (continuous catheter 215.9 (95% CI, 165.4–266.3); liposomal bupivacaine 211.0 (95% CI, 154.8–267.2); control 518.4 (95% CI 454.2–582.7), P < 0.001). Neither length of stay (P = 0.953), nor oral morphine equivalents consumption (P = 0.883) differed by type of regional analgesia. Conclusion:. Compared with control patients, both approaches to regional transversalis abdominis plane block analgesia as part of an opiate-sparing enhanced recovery pain management strategy were successful, but neither superior to the other.
At our institution, multimodal opiate-sparing pain management is the cornerstone of our enhanced recovery program for autologous breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes and pain control metrics following implementation of an enhanced recovery program with two different regional analgesia approaches. This retrospective cohort study identified 145 women who underwent autologous breast reconstruction from 2015 to 2017. Three groups were included: historical control patients (n = 46) and enhanced recovery patients that received multimodal pain management including a postoperative transversalis abdominis plane block with either a continuous local anesthetic catheter (n = 60) or a single-shot of liposomal bupivacaine (n = 39). The primary outcome was pain scores in the first three postoperative days. Secondary outcomes were opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents and length of stay. Postoperative pain scores were similar across all three groups until postoperative day 3. Length of stay was significantly shorter in both of the enhanced recovery cohorts (3.0 [3.0, 4.0]) compared with control patients (4.0 [4.0, 5.0], < 0.001). Likewise, average total oral morphine equivalents consumption was significantly reduced in enhanced recovery patients (continuous catheter 215.9 (95% CI, 165.4-266.3); liposomal bupivacaine 211.0 (95% CI, 154.8-267.2); control 518.4 (95% CI 454.2-582.7), < 0.001). Neither length of stay ( = 0.953), nor oral morphine equivalents consumption ( = 0.883) differed by type of regional analgesia. Compared with control patients, both approaches to regional transversalis abdominis plane block analgesia as part of an opiate-sparing enhanced recovery pain management strategy were successful, but neither superior to the other.
At our institution, multimodal opiate-sparing pain management is the cornerstone of our enhanced recovery program for autologous breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes and pain control metrics following implementation of an enhanced recovery program with two different regional analgesia approaches. METHODSThis retrospective cohort study identified 145 women who underwent autologous breast reconstruction from 2015 to 2017. Three groups were included: historical control patients (n = 46) and enhanced recovery patients that received multimodal pain management including a postoperative transversalis abdominis plane block with either a continuous local anesthetic catheter (n = 60) or a single-shot of liposomal bupivacaine (n = 39). The primary outcome was pain scores in the first three postoperative days. Secondary outcomes were opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents and length of stay. RESULTSPostoperative pain scores were similar across all three groups until postoperative day 3. Length of stay was significantly shorter in both of the enhanced recovery cohorts (3.0 [3.0, 4.0]) compared with control patients (4.0 [4.0, 5.0], P < 0.001). Likewise, average total oral morphine equivalents consumption was significantly reduced in enhanced recovery patients (continuous catheter 215.9 (95% CI, 165.4-266.3); liposomal bupivacaine 211.0 (95% CI, 154.8-267.2); control 518.4 (95% CI 454.2-582.7), P < 0.001). Neither length of stay (P = 0.953), nor oral morphine equivalents consumption (P = 0.883) differed by type of regional analgesia. CONCLUSIONCompared with control patients, both approaches to regional transversalis abdominis plane block analgesia as part of an opiate-sparing enhanced recovery pain management strategy were successful, but neither superior to the other.
At our institution, multimodal opiate-sparing pain management is the cornerstone of our enhanced recovery program for autologous breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes and pain control metrics following implementation of an enhanced recovery program with two different regional analgesia approaches.
Author Humeidan, Michelle L.
Roeth, Cory
Wang, Diana M.
Borrell-Vega, Jaume
Moffatt-Bruce, Susan D.
Harter, Ronald L.
Rendon, Juan L.
Abdel-Rasoul, Mahmoud
Skoracki, Roman J.
Reyes, Joshua-Paolo C.
AuthorAffiliation Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
Department of Psychiatry, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Fontana, Calif
From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio
Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
– name: From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
– name: Department of Psychiatry, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Fontana, Calif
– name: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
– name: Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
– name: Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Juan L.
  surname: Rendon
  fullname: Rendon, Juan L.
  organization: From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jaume
  surname: Borrell-Vega
  fullname: Borrell-Vega, Jaume
  organization: Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Joshua-Paolo C.
  surname: Reyes
  fullname: Reyes, Joshua-Paolo C.
  organization: Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Diana M.
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Diana M.
  organization: Department of Psychiatry, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Fontana, Calif
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Cory
  surname: Roeth
  fullname: Roeth, Cory
  organization: Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Mahmoud
  surname: Abdel-Rasoul
  fullname: Abdel-Rasoul, Mahmoud
  organization: Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Roman J.
  surname: Skoracki
  fullname: Skoracki, Roman J.
  organization: From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Ronald L.
  surname: Harter
  fullname: Harter, Ronald L.
  organization: Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Susan D.
  surname: Moffatt-Bruce
  fullname: Moffatt-Bruce, Susan D.
  organization: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Michelle L.
  surname: Humeidan
  fullname: Humeidan, Michelle L.
  organization: Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35070591$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpdkW9PFDEQxjcGI4h8A2P2pW8W-2e37b4xQXIiCQRjMPFdM9dO9xZ7W2y7XPj2Fg_xsEnTSeeZXzvzvK72pjBhVb2l5JiSXn44u_pxTHZWSyh5UR0wKvpGdrLd24n3q6OUbh5USrVUdq-qfd4RSbqeHlRucQd-hjxOQ51XWC-cGw2Y-zq4-noT6m84jGECX3-FcaovYYIB1zjl-jJY8GMeMdUlcTLn4MMQ5lR_iggpl0ITppTjbHIBvKleOvAJjx7Pw-r758X16Zfm4urs_PTkojEd7UkjHChq0TKrqDFOuV5KAwAcFTdMCcOwdM8kKQK-FKoT1lnRt0sqOkNQ8sPqfMu1AW70bRzXEO91gFH_uQhx0BDzaDxqcNQ6bC2BMj6z5CDbzrZcSU4JEc4V1sct63ZertGa0nUE_wz6PDONKz2EO62k6IniBfD-ERDDrxlT1usxGfQeJiyT0kww1qquFaxI263UxJBSRPf0DCX6wXFdHNf_O17K3u1-8anor7__uJvgM8b0088bjHqF4PNKEyoZIb1oGGGs8AhpyuaE_wbWWbl1
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1097_GOX_0000000000005874
Cites_doi 10.1097/00000637-199511000-00003
10.1016/j.bjps.2014.11.014
10.1097/PRS.0b013e318221da56
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.08.007
10.1093/bja/78.5.606
10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952
10.1213/ANE.0000000000001144
10.1007/s11605-009-0927-2
10.1097/PRS.0000000000004360
10.1097/PRS.0000000000003242
10.1097/PRS.0000000000002547
10.1016/S0885-3924(01)00294-9
10.1055/s-0032-1329921
10.1097/GOX.0000000000001480
10.1097/PRS.0000000000006546
10.1097/PRS.0000000000003235
10.1097/PRS.0000000000005300
10.1097/PRS.0000000000002855
10.1097/01.prs.0000475749.40838.85
10.1097/PRS.0000000000005698
10.1097/PRS.0000000000003508
10.1097/MCC.0b013e32832fbbe7
10.1016/j.bjps.2018.02.018
10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829ace62
10.1097/PRS.0000000000004197
10.1016/j.bjps.2019.11.003
10.1097/00006534-200102000-00009
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2022
Copyright_xml – notice: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
– notice: Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
– notice: Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2022
DBID NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004010
DatabaseName PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic

CrossRef
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: http://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 2169-7574
EndPage e4010
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_af1dfe4d0a004cb3a745d438731006ff
10_1097_GOX_0000000000004010
35070591
01720096-202201000-00030
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID 0R~
1J1
53G
5VS
AAAAV
AAAXR
AAGIX
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AAMOA
AAMTA
AAQKA
AARTV
AASCR
AASXQ
AAUEB
ABASU
ABBUW
ABDIG
ABVCZ
ABXVJ
ACDDN
ACEWG
ACGFS
ACILI
ACLDA
ACNWC
ACOAL
ACWDW
ACWRI
ACXJB
ACXNZ
ADBBV
ADGGA
ADHPY
ADPDF
AFDTB
AFSOK
AFUWQ
AGOPY
AHOMT
AHQNM
AIJEX
AINUH
AJIOK
AJNWD
AJZMW
AKULP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALMTX
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AOHHW
AOIJS
BAWUL
BCNDV
BOYCO
BQLVK
BYPQX
DIK
DIWNM
EBS
EEVPB
ERAAH
EX3
FCALG
GNXGY
GQDEL
GROUPED_DOAJ
HLJTE
HYE
HZ~
IKREB
IKYAY
IN~
KQ8
M48
M~E
N~7
N~B
O9-
OBH
OK1
OPUJH
OVD
OVDNE
OVEED
OVIDH
OVLEI
OVOZU
OXXIT
RIG
RLZ
RPM
TEORI
TSPGW
ACCJW
ADRAZ
AHVBC
E.X
EJD
FL-
FW0
IPNFZ
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c5190-6fa81ded2d81ccf8f977caaa3e83c286c2e0972702d83b6856dfd694b165c0e73
IEDL.DBID RPM
ISSN 2169-7574
IngestDate Tue Oct 22 14:56:19 EDT 2024
Tue Sep 17 21:14:51 EDT 2024
Thu Oct 24 23:57:12 EDT 2024
Wed Sep 25 14:11:25 EDT 2024
Wed Oct 16 00:41:17 EDT 2024
Thu Nov 14 19:01:41 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5190-6fa81ded2d81ccf8f977caaa3e83c286c2e0972702d83b6856dfd694b165c0e73
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8769083/
PMID 35070591
PQID 2622485462
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_af1dfe4d0a004cb3a745d438731006ff
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8769083
proquest_miscellaneous_2622485462
crossref_primary_10_1097_GOX_0000000000004010
pubmed_primary_35070591
wolterskluwer_health_01720096-202201000-00030
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-January-19
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-01-19
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-January-19
  day: 19
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: Hagerstown, MD
PublicationTitle Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
PublicationTitleAlternate Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Wolters Kluwer
Publisher_xml – name: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
– name: Wolters Kluwer
References Cannesson (R16-20240922) 2016; 122
Jablonka (R29-20240922) 2017; 140
Carroll (R13-20240922) 2013; 29
Batdorf (R5-20240922) 2015; 68
Phan (R19-20240922) 2008; 207
Davidge (R24-20240922) 2013; 132
Kehlet (R2-20240922) 1997; 78
Kaoutzanis (R11-20240922) 2018; 141
Oh (R28-20240922) 2018; 71
Gärtner (R14-20240922) 2010; 76
Sharma (R15-20240922) 2001; 107
Ha (R27-20240922) 2019; 144
Giordano (R25-20240922) 2020; 73
Vyas (R12-20240922) 2016; 138
Temple-Oberle (R23-20240922) 2017; 139
Sebai (R7-20240922) 2019; 143
Cederna (R1-20240922) 1995; 35
Kehlet (R9-20240922) 2009; 15
Zhong (R17-20240922) 2011; 128
Eskicioglu (R18-20240922) 2009; 13
Rendon (R3-20240922) 2020; 145
Macadam (R21-20240922) 2017; 139
Gatherwright (R26-20240922) 2018; 141
Afonso (R8-20240922) 2017; 5
Afonso (R4-20240922) 2017; 139
Ljungqvist (R6-20240922) 2017; 152
Bonde (R10-20240922) 2016; 137
Pereira (R22-20240922) 2001; 22
References_xml – volume: 35
  start-page: 458
  year: 1995
  ident: R1-20240922
  article-title: Postmastectomy reconstruction: comparative analysis of the psychosocial, functional, and cosmetic effects of transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap versus breast implant reconstruction.
  publication-title: Ann Plast Surg
  doi: 10.1097/00000637-199511000-00003
  contributor:
    fullname: Cederna
– volume: 68
  start-page: 395
  year: 2015
  ident: R5-20240922
  article-title: Enhanced recovery after surgery in microvascular breast reconstruction.
  publication-title: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.11.014
  contributor:
    fullname: Batdorf
– volume: 128
  start-page: 1153
  year: 2011
  ident: R17-20240922
  article-title: Intravenous fluid infusion rate in microsurgical breast reconstruction: important lessons learned from 354 free flaps.
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318221da56
  contributor:
    fullname: Zhong
– volume: 207
  start-page: 935
  year: 2008
  ident: R19-20240922
  article-title: Improving perioperative outcomes: fluid optimization with the esophageal Doppler monitor, a metaanalysis and review.
  publication-title: J Am Coll Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.08.007
  contributor:
    fullname: Phan
– volume: 78
  start-page: 606
  year: 1997
  ident: R2-20240922
  article-title: Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation.
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
  doi: 10.1093/bja/78.5.606
  contributor:
    fullname: Kehlet
– volume: 152
  start-page: 292
  year: 2017
  ident: R6-20240922
  article-title: Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review.
  publication-title: JAMA Surg
  doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952
  contributor:
    fullname: Ljungqvist
– volume: 122
  start-page: 1258
  year: 2016
  ident: R16-20240922
  article-title: PRO: perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy is an essential element of an enhanced recovery protocol.
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
  doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001144
  contributor:
    fullname: Cannesson
– volume: 13
  start-page: 2321
  year: 2009
  ident: R18-20240922
  article-title: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for patients having colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-0927-2
  contributor:
    fullname: Eskicioglu
– volume: 141
  start-page: 1327
  year: 2018
  ident: R26-20240922
  article-title: Prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of bupivacaine versus liposomal bupivacaine for pain management after unilateral delayed deep inferior epigastric perforator free flap reconstruction.
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004360
  contributor:
    fullname: Gatherwright
– volume: 139
  start-page: 1056e
  year: 2017
  ident: R23-20240922
  article-title: Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in breast reconstruction: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations.
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003242
  contributor:
    fullname: Temple-Oberle
– volume: 138
  start-page: 748e
  year: 2016
  ident: R12-20240922
  article-title: Systematic review of liposomal bupivacaine (exparel) for postoperative analgesia.
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002547
  contributor:
    fullname: Vyas
– volume: 22
  start-page: 672
  year: 2001
  ident: R22-20240922
  article-title: Equianalgesic dose ratios for opioids. a critical review and proposals for long-term dosing.
  publication-title: J Pain Symptom Manage
  doi: 10.1016/S0885-3924(01)00294-9
  contributor:
    fullname: Pereira
– volume: 29
  start-page: 213
  year: 2013
  ident: R13-20240922
  article-title: Perioperative interventions to reduce chronic postsurgical pain.
  publication-title: J Reconstr Microsurg
  doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1329921
  contributor:
    fullname: Carroll
– volume: 5
  start-page: e1480
  year: 2017
  ident: R8-20240922
  article-title: Multimodal analgesia in breast surgical procedures: technical and pharmacological considerations for liposomal bupivacaine use.
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
  doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001480
  contributor:
    fullname: Afonso
– volume: 76
  start-page: 805
  year: 2010
  ident: R14-20240922
  article-title: Multimodal prevention of pain, nausea and vomiting after breast cancer surgery.
  publication-title: Minerva Anestesiol
  contributor:
    fullname: Gärtner
– volume: 145
  start-page: 645
  year: 2020
  ident: R3-20240922
  article-title: Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols decrease outpatient opioid use in patients undergoing abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction.
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006546
  contributor:
    fullname: Rendon
– volume: 139
  start-page: 1053
  year: 2017
  ident: R4-20240922
  article-title: Is enhanced recovery the new standard of care in microsurgical breast reconstruction?
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003235
  contributor:
    fullname: Afonso
– volume: 143
  start-page: 655
  year: 2019
  ident: R7-20240922
  article-title: Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for microsurgical breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005300
  contributor:
    fullname: Sebai
– volume: 139
  start-page: 204e
  year: 2017
  ident: R21-20240922
  article-title: Evidence-based medicine: autologous breast reconstruction.
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002855
  contributor:
    fullname: Macadam
– volume: 137
  start-page: 411
  year: 2016
  ident: R10-20240922
  article-title: Perioperative optimization of autologous breast reconstruction.
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000475749.40838.85
  contributor:
    fullname: Bonde
– volume: 144
  start-page: 35
  year: 2019
  ident: R27-20240922
  article-title: The analgesic effects of liposomal bupivacaine versus bupivacaine hydrochloride administered as a transversus abdominis plane block after abdominally based autologous microvascular breast reconstruction: a prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial.
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005698
  contributor:
    fullname: Ha
– volume: 140
  start-page: 240
  year: 2017
  ident: R29-20240922
  article-title: Transversus abdominis plane blocks with single-dose liposomal bupivacaine in conjunction with a nonnarcotic pain regimen help reduce length of stay following abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction.
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003508
  contributor:
    fullname: Jablonka
– volume: 15
  start-page: 355
  year: 2009
  ident: R9-20240922
  article-title: Multimodal approach to postoperative recovery.
  publication-title: Curr Opin Crit Care
  doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32832fbbe7
  contributor:
    fullname: Kehlet
– volume: 71
  start-page: 819
  year: 2018
  ident: R28-20240922
  article-title: Cost analysis of enhanced recovery after surgery in microvascular breast reconstruction.
  publication-title: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.02.018
  contributor:
    fullname: Oh
– volume: 132
  start-page: 339e
  year: 2013
  ident: R24-20240922
  article-title: Processes of care in autogenous breast reconstruction with pedicled TRAM flaps: expediting postoperative discharge in an ambulatory setting.
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829ace62
  contributor:
    fullname: Davidge
– volume: 141
  start-page: 841
  year: 2018
  ident: R11-20240922
  article-title: Enhanced recovery pathway in microvascular autologous tissue-based breast reconstruction: should it become the standard of care?
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004197
  contributor:
    fullname: Kaoutzanis
– volume: 73
  start-page: 770
  year: 2020
  ident: R25-20240922
  article-title: Local anesthetic pain catheters to reduce opioid use in massive weight loss patients undergoing abdominoplasty: a comparative study.
  publication-title: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.11.003
  contributor:
    fullname: Giordano
– volume: 107
  start-page: 352
  year: 2001
  ident: R15-20240922
  article-title: Incidence of hematoma associated with ketorolac after TRAM flap breast reconstruction.
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/00006534-200102000-00009
  contributor:
    fullname: Sharma
SSID ssj0000884175
Score 2.237562
Snippet At our institution, multimodal opiate-sparing pain management is the cornerstone of our enhanced recovery program for autologous breast reconstruction. The...
Background: At our institution, multimodal opiate-sparing pain management is the cornerstone of our enhanced recovery program for autologous breast...
Background:. At our institution, multimodal opiate-sparing pain management is the cornerstone of our enhanced recovery program for autologous breast...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
crossref
pubmed
wolterskluwer
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage e4010
SubjectTerms Breast
Original
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1JS8QwFA7qSRBR3OpGBK_Fbll6dBn14oILeAtpFhWhFcZh8N_7XtoZrQpe7LENbZOX5fvy3vtCyL52thLCFDHnhscFr6q4ZLiRL523vmSOefTont-Kywd5MkCZnOlRXxgT1soDtw13oH1qvStsosGcpsq1KJgtcilwZ5p7H2bfRH4hU2EOlrKAhXGSK1eKg7Orh1arsLuAVyS9tShI9v-GM3-GSy6MG3RlD19CJPuX9eh0iSx2QJIethVYJjOuXiF-0Il3148UkB0doECENu-08fRu3NAb9xi2_ui1fq7pZ-gLvWgsAnKgzRQeHI7CqbbNaEiPMGj9jSJL_dSaXSX3p4O74_O4O0khNgxzxbnXgEudzaxMjfHSA-ozWuvcydxkkpvMoYyPSKBAXnHJuPWWl0WVcmYSJ_I1Mlc3tdsgVCBJE1YmEi0B7NAxoDy8TDOrU5-yiMSTNlWvrWCGmji6wQbquw0icoQNPy2LctfhBnQC1XUC9VcniMjexGwKhgf6PHTtoJVUxjMUbSt4FpH11ozTT-WAhQFdphERPQP3_qX_pH5-ChLcsIaUAF6hsr2uoNrkVYXEGskhzEEZhhu02ft5svkfld0i8_ha3AdKy20yB7Z3O2R2aEe7YRB8AKVDCZw
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Evaluating the Efficacy of Two Regional Pain Management Modalities in Autologous Breast Reconstruction
URI http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=01720096-202201000-00030
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35070591
https://search.proquest.com/docview/2622485462
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8769083
https://doaj.org/article/af1dfe4d0a004cb3a745d438731006ff
Volume 10
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Jb9QwFH5iekJCiIotLJWRuKaTzUuOXabtpVBBkXqzHC_DqDSpGEYV_573nKRtCidyjJ3Y8bPj722fAT4a7xopbZUKYUVaiaZJa06GfOWDCzX3PJBH9-Sr_HShDhdEk8PHXJgYtG-b1W7742q3XX2PsZXXV3Y-xonNz04PcAXXCB3mM5ghNrynosffr1IV7oljmlwt58efL3qawuFClYIOgCsRCiG4yCc7UiTu_xfa_Dto8slNRw7t9WWMZ7-3Kx09g6cDnGR7fbe34ZFvn0NYDBTe7ZIhvmMLookw9jfrAju_6dgXv4wGQHZmVi27C4Bhp50jWI7KM8OCvU0827bbrNk-ha7_YqSr3jHOvoBvR4vzg5N0OE8htZwyxkUwiE69K5zKrQ0qIPazxpjSq9IWStjCE5mPzLBC2QjFhQtO1FWTC24zL8uXsNV2rX8NTJKqJp3KlJHE4Vd7joqPqPPCmTzkPIF0HFN93dNm6NHdjeLQD8WRwD4N_G1dIr2ON7qfSz2IXpuQu-Arlxl8yDYlNe2qUklyUogQEvgwik3jIiHPh2k9jpIuREHUbZUoEnjVi_G2qXEaJCAnAp70ZVqC8zIScQ_zED92MhV0n8KqSb0mFRH_RAUFHfQ5_GX25r9beguP6V1kAsrrd7CFAvfvYbZ2m51oTNiJS-EPjUcKzQ
link.rule.ids 230,315,729,782,786,866,887,2108,27935,27936,53803,53805,64552,64572,65347,65367
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
linkToHtml http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELZoOYCEeIhXeBqJa7pJHD9ybMuWRXRLBYvUm-X4saygScWyqvj3zDhJ2wCn5hg7cZLPjr_xzHwm5K3xrpbSlqkQVqSlqOu04riQr3xwoeKeB_Tozr7IoxP1booyOXzIhYlB-7Ze7TQ_Tnea1bcYW3l2aidDnNjkeL4PI7gC6jDZIjdhvGbsipEef8BKlTArDolylZy8_3TSCRX2BxgVuAUcAzIE9CIfzUlRuv9_fPPfsMk75y26tNffY0T7lXnp4N413-g-udsTUbrbFT8gN3zzkIRpL_7dLCkwQzpFgQljf9M20MV5Sz_7ZVw6pMdm1dDL0Bk6bx0SejC7KRTsbuKuuO1mTfcw6P0XRSv3Uqv2Efl6MF3sz9J-J4bUcsw1F8EAr_WucCq3NqgArNEaY5hXzBZK2MKjDJDMoAKrheLCBSeqss4Ft5mX7DHZbtrGPyVUopEnncqUkaj-V3kOJpOo8sKZPOQ8IemAhT7rBDf04CgHGPXfMCZkDwG7qIty2fFE-3Op-0-sTchd8KXLDFxka4ZNu5Ipie4NEUJC3gxwaxhe6DMxjYevpAtRoOhbKYqEPOngv2hq6D4JkaOOMXqWcQngHyW8e7zhZUddSHfJrxoNczQu4R9WYLhCl_3PsmfXbuk1uTVbzA_14Yejj8_JbbwvLiTl1QuyDeD7l2Rr7Tav4kD6AznYH2w
linkToPdf http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Zb9QwELZokRBSxSGucBqJ1zSnjzz22KUIWlZQpL5Zjo9lRZusWFYV_54ZJ9k2wBPkMXbi2DOOv_GMvyHkjXa2FsKUMeeGxyWv67hiuJEvnbe-Yo559OgefRYnZ_JwgjQ5m1RfIWjf1Ivd5vxit1l8DbGVywuTDHFiyez4AGZwBdAhWVqfbJGbMGdTds1QDz9hKUtYGYfDcpVI3n4868gK-wsMC0wDVwAgAoiRjdalQN__N8z5Z-jkzmWLbu3VtxDVfm1tmt79j17dI3d6QEr3uir3yQ3XPCB-0pOAN3MKCJFOkGhCm5-09fT0sqWf3DxsIdKZXjT0KoSGHrcWgT2Y3xQK9tYhO267XtF9DH7_QdHaveKsfUi-TCenB0dxn5EhNgzPnHOvAd86m1uZGeOlB_RotNaFk4XJJTe5QzogkUKFouaScestr8o648ykThSPyHbTNu4JoQKNPWFlKrVAFsDKMTCdeJXlVmc-YxGJB3moZUe8oQaHOYhS_S7KiOyj0DZ1kTY73Gi_z1U_zEr7zHpX2lTDQ6YusGlbFlKgm4N7H5HXg8gVTDP0nejGwSipnOdI_lbyPCKPOxXYNDWoUETESDlG3zIuAR0IVN69zKGzIzVS3SFYhQY6GpnwL8sxbKFjASjSp__c0itya3Y4VR_enbx_Rm7ja3E_Kauek22QvXtBtlZ2_TLMpV9WEiHs
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating+the+Efficacy+of+Two+Regional+Pain+Management+Modalities+in+Autologous+Breast+Reconstruction&rft.jtitle=Plastic+and+reconstructive+surgery.+Global+open&rft.au=Rendon%2C+Juan+L&rft.au=Borrell-Vega%2C+Jaume&rft.au=Reyes%2C+Joshua-Paolo+C&rft.au=Wang%2C+Diana+M&rft.date=2022-01-19&rft.issn=2169-7574&rft.eissn=2169-7574&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e4010&rft.epage=e4010&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FGOX.0000000000004010&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2169-7574&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2169-7574&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2169-7574&client=summon