Cirrus cloud seeding: a climate engineering mechanism with reduced side effects?
Climate engineering, the intentional alteration of Earth's climate, is a multifaceted and controversial topic. Numerous climate engineering mechanisms (CEMs) have been proposed, and the efficacies and potential undesired consequences of some of them have been studied in the safe environments of...
Saved in:
Published in: | Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences Vol. 372; no. 2031; p. 20140116 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
England
The Royal Society Publishing
28-12-2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Climate engineering, the intentional alteration of Earth's climate, is a multifaceted and controversial topic. Numerous climate engineering mechanisms (CEMs) have been proposed, and the efficacies and potential undesired consequences of some of them have been studied in the safe environments of numerical models. Here, we present a global modelling study of a so far understudied CEM, namely the seeding of cirrus clouds to reduce their lifetimes in the upper troposphere, and hence their greenhouse effect. Different from most CEMs, the intention of cirrus seeding is not to reduce the amount of solar radiation reaching Earth's surface. This particular CEM rather targets the greenhouse effect, by reducing the trapping of infrared radiation by high clouds. This avoids some of the caveats that have been identified for solar radiation management, for example, the delayed recovery of stratospheric ozone or drastic changes to Earth's hydrological cycle. We find that seeding of mid- and high-latitude cirrus clouds has the potential to cool the planet by about 1.4K, and that this cooling is accompanied by only a modest reduction in rainfall. Intriguingly, seeding of the 15 of the globe with the highest solar noon zenith angles at any given time yields the same global mean cooling as a seeding strategy that involves 45 of the globe. In either case, the cooling is strongest at high latitudes, and could therefore serve to prevent Arctic sea ice loss. With the caveat that there are still significant uncertainties associated with ice nucleation in cirrus clouds and its representation in climate models, cirrus seeding appears to represent a powerful CEM with reduced side effects. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | One contribution of 15 to a Theme Issue Climate engineering: exploring nuances and consequences of deliberately altering the Earth's energy budget. istex:3EFF2B37AA7E20FFBFEE78A149FA8BBD76479161 ArticleID:rsta20140116 href:rsta20140116.pdf ark:/67375/V84-7HXHMKM6-3 Theme Issue 'Climate engineering: exploring nuances and consequences of deliberately altering the Earth's energy budget' compiled and edited by John Latham, Philip J. Rasch and Brian Launder ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1364-503X 1471-2962 |
DOI: | 10.1098/rsta.2014.0116 |