The Clinical and Occupational Correlates of Work Productivity Loss Among Employed Patients With Depression

Employers who are developing strategies to reduce health-related productivity loss may benefit from aiming their interventions at the employees who need them most. We determined whether depression's negative productivity impact varied with the type of work employees performed. Subjects (246 wit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of occupational and environmental medicine Vol. 46; no. 6; pp. S46 - S55
Main Authors: Lerner, Debra, Adler, David A., Chang, Hong, Berndt, Ernst R., Irish, Julie T., Lapitsky, Leueen, Hood, Maggie Y., Reed, John, Rogers, William H.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 01-06-2004
The American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Employers who are developing strategies to reduce health-related productivity loss may benefit from aiming their interventions at the employees who need them most. We determined whether depression's negative productivity impact varied with the type of work employees performed. Subjects (246 with depression and 143 controls) answered the Work Limitations Questionnaire and additional work questions. Occupational requirements were measured objectively. In multiple regression analyses, productivity was most influenced by depression severity (P < 0.01 in 5/5 models). However, certain occupations also significantly increased employee vulnerability to productivity loss. Losse increased when employees had occupations requiring proficiency in decision-making and communication and/or frequent customer contact (P < 0.05 in 3/5 models). The Work Limitations Questionnaire can help employers to reduce productivity loss by identifying health and productivity improvement priorities.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1076-2752
1536-5948
DOI:10.1097/01.jom.0000126684.82825.0a