Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation versus Debridement for Treatment of Full-Thickness Chondral Defects of the Knee An Observational Cohort Study with 3-Year Follow-up

Background Studies that compare the effectiveness of different cartilage repair treatments are needed to update treatment algorithms. Hypothesis Autologous chondrocyte implantation provides greater improvement in overall condition score than does debridement at a minimum of 3 years’ follow-up. Study...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of sports medicine Vol. 33; no. 11; pp. 1658 - 1666
Main Authors: Fu, Freddie H., Zurakowski, David, Browne, Jon E., Mandelbaum, Bert, Erggelet, Christoph, Moseley, J. Bruce, Anderson, Allen F., Micheli, Lyle J.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01-11-2005
American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine
Sage Publications, Inc
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Studies that compare the effectiveness of different cartilage repair treatments are needed to update treatment algorithms. Hypothesis Autologous chondrocyte implantation provides greater improvement in overall condition score than does debridement at a minimum of 3 years’ follow-up. Study Design Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods Cohorts for debridement and autologous chondrocyte implantation each included 58 Cartilage Repair Registry patients who met study criteria. A retrospective analysis was performed on prospectively collected baseline and follow-up data. Results Patients in the autologous chondrocyte implantation and debridement groups had similar demographics and chondral lesions at baseline. However, more autologous chondrocyte implantation patients failed a previous debridement or marrow stimulation procedure than did debridement patients. Follow-up outcome assessments were completed by 54 autologous chondrocyte implantation patients and 42 debridement patients. Eighty-one percent of the autologous chondrocyte implantation patients and 60% of the debridement patients reported median improvements of 5 points and 2 points, respectively, in the overall condition score. Autologous chondrocyte implantation patients also reported greater improvements in the median pain and swelling scores than did debridement patients. The treatment failure rate was the same for both autologous chondrocyte implantation and debridement patients. Eighteen autologous chondrocyte implantation patients and 1 debridement patient had at least 1 subsequent operation. Conclusion Although patients treated with debridement for symptomatic, large, focal, chondral defects of the distal femur had some functional improvement at follow-up, patients who received autologous chondrocyte implantations obtained higher levels of knee function and had greater relief from pain and swelling at 3 years.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0363-5465
1552-3365
DOI:10.1177/0363546505275148