Not that kind of tree: Assessing the potential for decision tree–based plant identification using trait databases

• Published in: Applications in plant sciences Vol. 8; no. 7; pp. e11379 - n/a
• Main Authors: Almeida, Brianna K., Garg, Manish, Kubat, Miroslav, Afkhami, Michelle E.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01-07-2020; John Wiley and Sons Inc; Wiley
• Subjects: Application; Big Data; Classification; Datasets; decision tree; Decision trees; Endangered & extinct species; Genera; Identification; information gain; Learning algorithms; Machine learning; Morphology; New species; plant identification; Plant sciences; Software; TRY plant trait database; information gain; TRY plant trait database; decision tree; machine learning; plant identification
• ISSN: 2168-0450; 2168-0450
• DOI: 10.1002/aps3.11379

Premise
Advancements in machine learning and the rise of accessible “big data” provide an important opportunity to improve trait‐based plant identification. Here, we applied decision‐tree induction to a subset of data from the TRY plant trait database to (1) assess the potential of decision trees for plant identification and (2) determine informative traits for distinguishing taxa.
Methods
Decision trees were induced using 16 vegetative and floral traits (689 species, 20 genera). We assessed how well the algorithm classified species from test data and pinpointed those traits that were important for identification across diverse taxa.
Results
The unpruned tree correctly placed 98% of the species in our data set into genera, indicating its promise for distinguishing among the species used to construct them. Furthermore, in the pruned tree, an average of 89% of the species from the test data sets were properly classified into their genera, demonstrating the flexibility of decision trees to also classify new species into genera within the tree. Closer inspection revealed that seven of the 16 traits were sufficient for the classification, and these traits yielded approximately two times more initial information gain than those not included.
Discussion
Our findings demonstrate the potential for tree‐based machine learning and big data in distinguishing among taxa and determining which traits are important for plant identification.