Enhancing recovery of ammonia from swine manure anaerobic digester effluent using gas-permeable membrane technology

[Display omitted] •Low-rate aeration enhanced ammonia recovery of the gas-permeable membrane process.•More than 96–98% of ammonia was recovered from digested swine effluent.•The low-rate aeration reacted with the natural carbonates and increased pH.•Recovery was 5 times faster compared without aerat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Waste management (Elmsford) Vol. 49; pp. 372 - 377
Main Authors: Dube, P.J., Vanotti, M.B., Szogi, A.A., García-González, M.C.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Elsevier Ltd 01-03-2016
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:[Display omitted] •Low-rate aeration enhanced ammonia recovery of the gas-permeable membrane process.•More than 96–98% of ammonia was recovered from digested swine effluent.•The low-rate aeration reacted with the natural carbonates and increased pH.•Recovery was 5 times faster compared without aeration.•Utilizing aeration resulted in a 70% reduction in costs for the system. Gas-permeable membrane technology is useful to recover ammonia from manure. In this study, the technology was enhanced using aeration instead of alkali chemicals to increase pH and the ammonium (NH4+) recovery rate. Digested effluents from covered anaerobic swine lagoons containing 1465–2097mgNH4+–NL−1 were treated using submerged membranes (0.13cm2cm−3), low-rate aeration (120mL airL-manure−1min−1) and nitrification inhibitor (22mgL−1) to prevent nitrification. The experiment included a control without aeration. The pH of the manure with aeration rose from 8.6 to 9.2 while the manure without aeration decreased from 8.6 to 8.1. With aeration, 97–99% of the NH4+ was removed in about 5days of operation with 96–98% recovery efficiency. In contrast, without aeration it took 25days to treat the NH4+. Therefore, the recovery of NH4+ was five times faster with the low-rate aeration treatment. This enhancement could reduce costs by 70%.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0956-053X
1879-2456
DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.12.011